Time for iOSX 1.0 to appear.
One OS for all your hardware...
OS Xi, otherwise known as OS eleven (which comes after 10) would be a far superior name in my opinion. Lower case "i" would be a tip of the hat to iOS.
Time for iOSX 1.0 to appear.
One OS for all your hardware...
I'm sure he's a nice guy but he kinda comes across as a pompous douche.
How many of his "yep" and "nope" comments have been accurate in the last year? I am guessing that if this guy has a 100% track record, then Apple is feeding him this information. If Apple is not giving him information, then they are not doing a great job of figuring out his circle of friends in an attempt to stop the leaks.
I wish someone would ask him if the new Mac Pro will be introduced at WWDC!![]()
This dalrymple dude is annoying. He can't do more than 1 word? It's not cool anymore. I guess that's his "brand" or whatever, but give me a break. At least act like you care about your readers.
Read Mythical Man Month...
Throwing random bodies at a problem makes the problem worse, not better.
And you don't staff based on infrequent surges in work load.
There's a ton of overlap between the two platforms software-wise. It's just hard to see from the customer's perspective where the interface is really our only window into a sort of "code iceberg". We see the top piece of it, but there's a lot more underneath that binds everything together.
And IIRC, they have a core team that works on the bottom layers of the OS (Darwin), and they technically work for both the iOS and OS X teams already.
Pulling software developers from one team to another is very common in software development, especially operating system development. Only reason people making a big deal about this is because it is "public." I put quotes around "public" because Apple Project Managers haven't officially said yes this happened. Other companies do this, it just isn't "announced" to the "public" like this all the time.True, but that doesn't mean that a year ago they couldn't have brought in more people. There are lots of bugs to fix, and lots of new features to do. Apple is known for keeping teams small - sometimes too small, as is apparent now.
If they're pulling engineers from one OS to another, this isn't a case where the Mythical Man Month applies. These aren't infrequent surges in work load. There's always work load.
It continues development like nothing happened. It's normal.So what happens with OS X 10.9?![]()
It would sure be nice if in return iOS engineers pitched in getting OS X 10.9 out.
How late will 10.9 be now? Will we see it in 2013?
If only apple had enough money to hire more engineers![]()
very sad that Apple, the largest tech company in the world is struggling to release two OSs. Clearly they are messing up in a big way if these are getting rushed out the door.
I still laugh when people talk about the "mythical man month", as if Apple hasn't made it obvious that each team could use more people by... moving people around constantly.
It would take time to train, etc etc, but it has to be done SOME time. Saying "they can't help right now" would mean you might as well never hire anyone ever. And that's a horrible idea.
Ah poop, once again didn't read the article and concentrated more on making a snide remark. Sorry![]()
Who said they aren't hiring? Just go to their job opportunities page. Looks to me like they are hiring.
Apple has pulled engineers off OS X 10.9 ?????
C'mon!!!! hire some more engineers for god sake !!! need more H1-B visas??? find them here in the states... or are we out of programmers already?![]()
My point was more... saying they shouldn't get new people because they can't do something NOW is not a good argument.
>_>
I agree, this seems a bit 'staged', perhaps for marketing purposesthis is obviously a controlled "leak" to get people to talk about it without actually giving anything away while it spreads like fire on the social media. i mean, its free viral marketing, what more could they ask for.
Well the point of those arguments is that flat out hiring more engineers right now would be pointless. Plus another point of those arguments is that this is done at just about every development house. Let's not play dumb and think that no company ever moves people from one project, or more specifically, one OS to another OS during crunch mode. It makes perfect sense too.
So they could create OS X Vista?