And hopefully multi user accounts.
There is a solution for this problem: buy another iPad.
And hopefully multi user accounts.
The iPad needs multi-user support much more desperately than this.
Ugh. Do we really need this? It's the kind of feature where the idea seems better than the reality. The vast majority of users would never bother with it.
The iPad needs multi-user support much more desperately.
And now I will have a good excuse to buy an iPad Air. I've had an iPad 2 for a long time, and I assume it won't support this feature.
that aint happening since most of iDevices are for personal use.
So long as support is adopted across more than just the core apps, sure why not?
Never really saw the need or draw in Samsung tablets and Windows tablets being able to do this. Hell, I hate doing it on a desktop.
Give me more RAM, a better battery and the OS X like fullscreen swiping between running apps and I'd take that over this "multitasking".
But hey, I've been wanting some iPad specific features for a little while (over and above what iPad optimized apps provide). Looking forward to WWDC.
It seems like we are getting TouchWiz on the iPad.
That someone is me!
Seriously though, this would require more RAM as two apps would have to be kept active. If Safari for iPad already struggles to keep a couple tabs opened without refreshing when you switch between them, I can't imagine what it would be like if you have, say, a game running next to it and using lots of RAM as well.
At least the way it is currently, an app in background can easily free some memory by releasing all the visual stuff that can be reconstructed when the app comes in foreground again (that's what UIViews typically do when they receive a low memory warning). With this split-screen feature, the two active apps would have to "share" memory all the time even down to the visual elements.
Since when did Samsung invent split screen multitasking? They weren't even first to use it in a tablet.![]()
And hopefully multi user accounts.
I don't think they will ever add full multi-user support - at least in the near future. They want everyone to have their own! The best we can hope for is a better "kids" mode where you can restrict what apps they can see.
You know that it is already possible to swipe through apps on de iPad?
Surface's implementation of split-screen sucks. I do think split-screen has value, especially when it comes to taking down notes or when you want to look at a website while working in another app. I see this as Apple's implementation of touch-based cut and paste. They took longer to implement it because they wanted to get it right. It's better to delay a feature than to release something that doesn't work well.
Why does it? It seems very obvious to me that Apple intends for customers to have one device per person, with one account per person.
Any other option makes no sense to Apple from a financial perspective.
I'm looking forward to more Desktop-esque features on the iPad, otherwise it's just going to sit in my desk drawer doing nothing.
Ugh. Do we really need this? It's the kind of feature where the idea seems better than the reality. The vast majority of users would never bother with it.
The iPad needs multi-user support much more desperately.
You have it the wrong way round. iDevices are used in this manner because there is no multi-user login.
Please Apple - even a main and a guest account would do, so I can at least let my mates use my iPad without the constant threat that they're going to change the language, set an alarm for 4am or change my name to C***yMcP*ssFlaps when I'm not looking.
Surface's implementation of split-screen sucks. I do think split-screen has value, especially when it comes to taking down notes or when you want to look at a website while working in another app. I see this as Apple's implementation of touch-based cut and paste. They took longer to implement it because they wanted to get it right. It's better to delay a feature than to release something that doesn't work well.