The sales freefall will probably halt next year as the iPhone 8 is gonna be a game changer.I don't think Apple are bothered while they have a small but very profitable market share.
Interesting to see what Apple does if iPhone sales keep falling.
The sales freefall will probably halt next year as the iPhone 8 is gonna be a game changer.I don't think Apple are bothered while they have a small but very profitable market share.
Interesting to see what Apple does if iPhone sales keep falling.
Freefall?The sales freefall will probably halt next year as the iPhone 8 is gonna be a game changer.
This summer I was at Six Flags. While waiting in line, I actually did a count (because there isn't much else to do). It worked out to be roughly 90% iPhone vs everything else. Yeah, anecdotal and all that, but I doubt there is some "amusement park iPhone bias". Perhaps it is a regional thing? Literally everyone I know, friends, family, people I see grocery shopping, at the mall, etc. it is more of the same; 9/10 iPhones.I don't know anyone with an iPhone. Everyone I work with has Android phones. I've been using my iPhone 6S+ for the past few months because of the jailbreak app iBlacklist but eventually will go back to either using my Note 5 or S7 Edge as my daily.
I will be skipping the iPhone this year and will buy the S8 when it comes out.
Fixed it. The rest was just another opinion on this "vast" internet.Putting profits first isnt sustainable in the long run.iPad,iPhone,Mac and iPod were invented by You-know-who.Tim invented more emojis,Apple Watch and Watchbands.
All this emojis,the marketing and "courage" statements remind me of this famous Jobs quote
"When you have a market monopoly, the sales and marketing people end up running the company. The product people get run out of the company. Then the companies forget what it means to make great products. The [researchers] at Xerox PARC used to call the people who ran Xerox ‘toner heads.’ They just had no clue about a computer or what it could do…"
Tim Cook is the new Steve Jobs
Are you sure it wasn't Starbucks?This summer I was at Six Flags. While waiting in line, I actually did a count (because there isn't much else to do). It worked out to be roughly 90% iPhone vs everything else. Yeah, anecdotal and all that, but I doubt there is some "amusement park iPhone bias". Perhaps it is a regional thing? Literally everyone I know, friends, family, people I see grocery shopping, at the mall, etc. it is more of the same; 9/10 iPhones.
Yet Apple still commands more than 50% of global smartphone revenue share
I'm not lower middle-class. When you look at the average incomes and level discretionary income outside USA/Europe it's very different than USA/Europe. A $750+ device is not affordable on a global standard.
what is middle class to you?
in the USA it's what every person can afford who has credit. The iphone is not luxury.
what? of course its relevant. BTW android phones have been in all those 'low income' markets that you speak off for a while now. So its not a new user buys android, but one that continues buying android. BTW low income countries are just a market like any other.Basically an irrelevant number. As smartphones penetrate India, Africa, and other countries with extremely large no-income populations, the only factor is cost. That's not a "market". Android phones get dumped there in large quantities with low quality. A more relevant number is a country by country marketshare. Though, even that is easily misinterpreted.
I just want to ask how did you determine is social class?...
Thw iphone is not luxury - when someone who is lower middle class like yourself can buy one then it's definitely not luxury
Than Samsung by that logic should meet the same demise, right?That will soon change, as its overall market share becomes more and more irrelevant (first to one digit numbers, then lower one digit numbers, eventually demise).
Overall, Apple has been disappointing both in terms of OS and somewhat in terms of hardware.
And to all the smug "it's because they are poor" replies above, get your nose out in the real world.
This summer I was at Six Flags. While waiting in line, I actually did a count (because there isn't much else to do). It worked out to be roughly 90% iPhone vs everything else. Yeah, anecdotal and all that, but I doubt there is some "amusement park iPhone bias". Perhaps it is a regional thing? Literally everyone I know, friends, family, people I see grocery shopping, at the mall, etc. it is more of the same; 9/10 iPhones.
Too bad for the people using Android. I think Apple has the better overall experience.
It's amazing how some think their personal experience represents meaningful statistics that holds true when applied to tens or hundreds of millions of people.I am out in the "real world" and I most certainly don't see 87.5% of people carrying around Android phones. It's more like 50/50 everywhere that I have been. As for here in the office that I work at (with approximately 500 employees) it runs about 60% iPhones and 40% various Android devices. There were also a handful here that recently returned their Note 7 for an iPhone 7+ after that entire debacle too.
what? of course its relevant. BTW android phones have been in all those 'low income' markets that you speak off for a while now. So its not a new user buys android, but one that continues buying android. BTW low income countries are just a market like any other.
[doublepost=1478195930][/doublepost]
I just want to ask how did you determine is social class?
Disagree. Android's race to the lowest price point isn't the most sustainable pricing strategyThat will soon change, as its overall market share becomes more and more irrelevant (first to one digit numbers, then lower one digit numbers, eventually demise).
Seems both sustainable enough (it's been going for a while now), and great for consumers. Personally I am very excited about Huawei and Xiaomi entering the fray (i.e. EU market). I don't particularly like Samsung's dominance in the field.Disagree. Android's race to the lowest price point isn't the most sustainable pricing strategy
I'm fine, thank you for your interest.Too bad for the people using Android. I think Apple has the better overall experience.
Examples?
Hello, called the iPhone SE. Excellent iPhone, $399 price, Apple environment, to name a few benefits. There are deals with trade-in, interest free payments, that can reduce the price more. No not your $50 phone, definitely a lower price quality phone.
It is only recently that Samsung phone camera have been marginally better than iPhones, it took Samsung seven models to achieve camera parity, that's hardly an achievement, but an achievement regardless. And I think we have reached a point of diminishing returns, there is only so much that can be done in terms of camera sensor size in phones to improve noise and DR. Manufacturers are exploring the design space for improvements by different means, such as dual cameras.
And why compare just the camera, why not also show the lagging part of Samsung S7, the processor, care to compare that to the processor of 6s and now the 7, in-spite of using lesser cores and clocked slower?