Oh yes, the iPad 2 had horrible specifications when it was released in March. 1GHz dual-core A5 chip, twice as much RAM as the original iPad, the addition of two cameras, etc.
Anyway, I don't think very many people would care if the next iPad were slightly thicker, as long as the feature set was worth it.
Function>Form
I don't care if it's bigger than a huge desktop PC I am buying it.
What trend does this follow? When has an Apple device in a pre-existing line gotten thicker, while otherwise retaining a familiar form factor? Look at the iPod nanos, MacBooks, iPhones, iPads, even iMacs. Everything gets thinner. This is just a rumor; it has no history to back it up.
If anyone paid attention to Jobs, they would know that the iPad 3 can not be thicker. When Apple released the risky iPad, they took a chance and succeeded. Then they released iPad 2 which further smoked the competition. The point is for better or for worse, Apple sets the rules.
Now would you make the tablet thicker and move the goal posts? Comparing the iPad to the iPhone isn't valid-the iPhone has never been the slimmest phone on the market, and probably never will be. So you can make a compromise in a competitive market of adding a bit of space since you're not the one pushing where technology is completely-just where you want it to go. This compromise is OK.
But furthermore, increasing the size of the iPad sets a bad example. If engineers can enlarge it, how is Apple innovating on design over its peers? The answer is, its not. And allowing one compromise like this without a good reason would allow more, until the product gets tied down in worthless features.
iPad 3 can not be thicker unless the marketplace demands a feature which requires it to be. iPad has no competition yet, therefore such a feature does not exist yet. These rumors are false.
As far as the iPad not having any competition could come from the fact that they are suing everyone that is making a tablet.
No. They are after Samsung.
The vast majority of other tablets are total ****. Which is why no one's buying them.
And no one really wants the Galaxy Tab, either. There was never a ban on them in the US.
The iPad has no competition because it is a typical Apple product.
Do you want a Retina Display ?
You do ?!!?
Well think before you comment
Battery life is important. In fact it is more important then your fashion statement
People should really drop the notion that going thicker is so "un-Apple like." Apple did exactly that with the iPhone 3G/3GS.
Dear MacRumors, Repeat after me:
"I MacRumors solemnly swear that I will never repeat any rumor that comes from any iPhone or iPad case-maker, any unnamed Asian parts supplier or any financial analyst - named or not, ever again."
Function>Form
The original was 13.4mm and the iPad 2 slimmed down to 8.8mm
So even if it goes back up to 10mm thick, it doesn't ***** MATTER for what you get in return. I'm sure Ives is just fine with that for the trade off of a retina display.
Some people say the iPad2 is actually TOO light and needs a tad more weight. I tend to agree.
Does it matter? He just proved that Apple has done it before.
And seriously, people making a big deal about the iPad 3 being slightly (and that is ever so slightly) thicker that complaining about it need to rethink their lives. Seriously re-think your life and why you even care.