For now the only thing my ipad is competing against is my remote.
It's not being held back by anything. You can make any application you want on there. You can make a desktop class app that does everything you want.
Keep this in mind when you see a misinformation campaign like the one we are seeing now:
When you cede to unreasonable and unrealistic demands then those people who made the demands will become even more demanding. They will shift the goal posts and start to demand Linux preinstalls or Android preinstalls. There's no limit to what they will ask for if you have already given them a little.
It's like my dad used to say, and maybe yours said the same thing. If you give a greedy person a hand they will take your whole arm off.
Next up the VP of Marketing for Apple Pencils is going to explain why all 4 (and next years model) are complementary and Apple think we should have at least one of each.Of course they want you to buy both. If they could convince you that Macbook Pro and Air, and iPad Pro and Air, are complementary devices, they would.
If you'd have told me a couple of years ago that your processor choice would be the M4 in an iPad, the M3 in a laptop and the M2 in the desktop I would have laughed you out of the room. You couldn't make it up.The problem is they've painted themselves into a corner by making the iPad line so insanely powerful that the only thing holding it back and the dividing line in place is the dreadfully hobbled iPadOS, that they're trying to maintain. Honestly I don't know where they can go from here, the new iPad's power is too much for the few niche apps that can take advantage of it, something has got to give way in the next couple of years.
I don't think that has changed. I always saw the 'What's a laptop' series of adverts as Apple asking people to consider whether they really need a traditional laptop to get their work done, and perhaps their needs can be met by an iPad instead.So the annoying advert with the irritating teen who said ‘laptop? What’s a laptop?’ What happened to that ethos that Apple were extolling?
The only positive thing, yes.That’s what you took away from this article??
The only reason it doesn't is because Apple doesn't want to make that product.A simple question - is there any reason why an iPad Pro with an M4 chip couldn't be capable of running both iOS and MacOS? I think the top of the line M4 iPad, fully loaded, is around $3000. For that kind of money, I'd want an iPad Pro that switches to MacOs when connected to a magic keyboard. You get the best of both worlds. An iPad AND a MacBook Pro.
You got the quote wrong. The quote from the kid was “What’s a computer?” Not “what’s a laptop?” There’s a big difference because a laptop is a computer but a computer is not necessarily a laptop. All Apple was saying is that the iPad is also a computer. This advertising campaign was done during the days when iPads were considered toys used for casual tasks only and mostly used by little kids. Apple wanted people to seriously consider an iPad as a computer.So the annoying advert with the irritating teen who said ‘laptop? What’s a laptop?’ What happened to that ethos that Apple were extolling?
They sell $350 iPads for those with lighter wallets.Complementary? How out of touch with reality can you be? A loaded iPad Pro is $2900! That’s not a complementary product. A small % of consumers are not purchasing both a Mac and iPad Pro at those costs.
A simple question - is there any reason why an iPad Pro with an M4 chip couldn't be capable of running both iOS and MacOS? I think the top of the line M4 iPad, fully loaded, is around $3000. For that kind of money, I'd want an iPad Pro that switches to MacOs when connected to a magic keyboard. You get the best of both worlds. An iPad AND a MacBook Pro.
It doesn't necessarily need macOS, it needs a modern touch-centric fusion of iPadOS & macOS. Something fresh & new with the power & full compatibility of macOS under the hood.macOS coming to the iPad at WWDC 2024, I'm calling it![]()
I'm guessing we might have had that by now (or soon), if Apple hadn't (apparently) given up on making their own modems. Having to pay Qualcom for modems (and licence) just don't make that as attractive...Has anyone asked an Apple executive why they don't offer cellular on MacBooks?
It doesn't necessarily need macOS, it needs a modern touch-centric fusion of iPadOS & macOS. Something fresh & new with the power & full compatibility of macOS under the hood.
As it stands, the iPad "Pro" is absolutely useless without a proper operating system.
While I agree that there is no end to demands, I don't think that's the whole truth.
I suggest reading this post by Federico Viticci from Macstories.
Federico has spent the last 12 years working primarily on an iPad (he loves the iPad) on the many actual, concrete reasons
I've been complaining about the iPad OS since it launched. Just view my post history since I joined MR.It has a proper operating system as attested by millions of students and creatives who don't care what a minority of unproductive people think.
You are only speaking for those who jumped on this month's complain bandwagon. Next month it will be another bandwagon.
I've been complaining about the iPad OS since it launched. Just view my post history since I joined MR.
As the iPad has gotten so powerful, it's totally absurd that it's so heavily gimped & restricted with such a terrible, terrible OS.
I mean its a public forum for talking about Apple stuff with Apple enthusiasts. Isn't this the place to do exactly what I am doing?The issue on forums is people with extreme opinions have a high opinion about themselves and forget that there are millions of people who are highly productive with the iPad and get on with their lives.
Despite the incredible performance that the M4 chip brings, reviewers pointed out the shortcomings of iPadOS. SixColors Jason Snell said that the iPad Pro is able to "handle pretty much any task it's capable of executing," but that it's "let down by iPadOS limitations."
Longtime iPad user Federico Viticci of MacStories didn't share a full review of the new iPad, but he penned a piece pointing out the many shortcomings of iPadOS. It's well worth a read to see what it's like using an iPad as a main machine, with highlights on the pain points of multitasking, limited apps, and more.
The Wall Street Journal's Joanna Stern said that using the iPad Pro is like "driving a Ferrari on a golf course" because the iPhone-based operating system hampers what the iPad could be capable of doing.
Gizmodo said that despite the creativity apps available on the iPad, it "still isn't direct competition for the versatility of a MacBook" and it's not a good platform for those who want to "multitask on multiple windows."
Almost every review mentioned the shortcomings of iPadOS as the major fault with the new iPad Pro models.