Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's always interesting to see so many of you telling the worlds most valuable company how they should run it, and what their price points and profit margins should be! Its only $30,00 X how many millions of units they will sell! Lets be realistic, is 30 bucks really a show stopper for you guys? If it is, go mow a lawn or rake someones leaves and earn the extra $30.00. Just stop whining about it! Now let's sit back and read all of the whining reply's!

Only whining I am perceiving is from this post :mad:
 
I'll have to agree with some of the other posters here.

I think the "low end" may be important in terms of the education market. Especially since Amazon is building in things such as WhisperSync into their Kindle line to allow school systems to more easily manage classrooms full of tablets.

When a parent/school system sees a Kindle Fire HD for $199 vs an iPad Mini for $329 I'm thinking that the price will be a big deciding factor. Who knows, they've had cheaper lower spec edu-only model Macs in the past, perhaps they will do the same for the tablets.

Perhaps Apple is happy to give up this market segment. But then why would they develop and release a mini tablet anyway? In my opinion if they just keep the "older model" at $399 each cycle I think it would still capture the same people who are willing to pay "extra" for a premium tablet experience.

A $249-$279 WiFi, 8-inch, A5 iPad Mini would have decimated the mini tablet competitors. $329 leaves a huge opening for the others to thrive. From experience with my friends and family who bought into the 7" Android mini tablets many are looking to upgrade now. But now they are only interested in upgrading within the same Android family because of the apps that they have already purchased. If Apple would've captured them at the lower end with a sub $300 tablet they would have had a clear upgrade path to the top and would have locked them into the Apple App store/iTunes ecosystem.

I currently have an iPad2 that I use much more than my iPhone5 and I was considering getting a smaller tablet just for "fun".

But at $329 I'll have to pass on the Mini.

I think a Nexus 7 may be in my future! Lets see what all of these Android guys are talking about!


I sold my Nexus 7 16gb for either the 32gb Nexus 7 or the iPad Mini. The Android environment is actually very good and the Nexus 7 is quite an impressive tablet (Heck, it comes with GPS for heavens sake).

The iPad Mini is going to have to win me over on specifications. The rear camera will be nice but it really has to have a screen that is just as sharp/clear if not better then the Nexus 7. A 1024x768 screen will just not hack it, not for the price they will be peddling it. I would be willing to pay 50-100 more for an iPad Mini, but it has to at least beat the Nexus 7 in features.

I don`t pay 100 more just to have an apple logo on my device, sorry fanboys.
 
i was under the impression that "mini" indicates a cheaper alternative with older specs than the high end "big" model to introduce more people to the apple ecosystem. guess i was mistaken
 
I don`t pay 100 more just to have an apple logo on my device, sorry fanboys.

I wouldn't pay $100 extra for an iPad. I'd either pay $329 or whatever it is for an iPad or nothing for nothing. With Android on it, I might as well just use a cheap netbook since it won't really work with anything else.
 
i Just sold my iPad 3.

i find the whole ipad idea a complete waste of money and effort.

using it is cumbersome with the tiny buttons on the menus which always seem to be in the worst possible places when holding the device.

The Keyboard sucks and is a chore to type on.

Safari never remembers anything especially passwords and logins.

An ipad mini wont fix any of these glaring problems so i guess im out for good.

Ill wait for a Haswell x86 Windows 8 slate which will be a real tablet computer and not an oversized ipod touch
 
i was under the impression that "mini" indicates a cheaper alternative with older specs than the high end "big" model to introduce more people to the apple ecosystem. guess i was mistaken

That would make perfect sense if the 7 inch Android tablets did not exist. The fact of the matter is Apple has to draw people into the Apple ecosystem versus those people going to the Android ecosystem. If the features are rubbish, and the price is high, you are not going to get that many people into the Apple system.
 
nexus 7 32GB at $249 looks good...

or let us wait for couple of revisions of iPad mini (and get the older generation for bit cheap :D )
 
My proposed spec list.

7.85 inches
1024 x 768 resolution (Same as the iPad 2)
A5 processor (Same used in the iPad 2)
512mb of ram (Same as the iPad 2)
16 gig base model (I just don't see how 8gig will fly at $329)
5 mp camera rear camera (I could be wrong on this one)
HD front facing camera
lighting port
No GPS in the base model
$200 build cost ($129 Apple tax, opps, I mean profit)



But what I don't understand is the the iPod touch at $299. Leads me to believe that Apple could very well release a 8gig mini at $329 which is just not enough space. How many people are going to pass up a 16gig iPad mini for $30 more over the overpriced touch? And the only reason I said A5 and not the A6 is because I highly doubt Apple will make the mini faster than the iPad 3 unless Apple is revising it as well. There will be no need to have a power hungry A5X chip in the mini at 1024x768 resolution and the A5 does fine at that resolution.

And many people tend to forget that Amazon still has their 16gig 8.9" Fire HD with 1900x1200 resolution and $299 price tag coming out on 11/20.
 
Whatever price Apple come up for the iPad mini they will sell tons and many people here will look silly. This is a recurring thing. :D
 
Wish it was 7" and 16:9 instead of fat boy 4:3

Yeah I't a shame they didn't use this opportunity to go to the same screen ratio as the new iPhone, would make like for app developers easier.

But what I don't understand is the the iPod touch at $299. Leads me to believe that Apple could very well release a 8gig mini at $329 which is just not enough space.

Remember the base iPod touch has 32Gb. So twice the size but a smaller screen.
 
My proposed spec list.

7.85 inches
1024 x 768 resolution (Same as the iPad 2)
A5 processor (Same used in the iPad 2)
512mb of ram (Same as the iPad 2)
16 gig base model (I just don't see how 8gig will fly at $329)
5 mp camera rear camera (I could be wrong on this one)
HD front facing camera
lighting port
No GPS in the base model
$200 build cost ($129 Apple tax, opps, I mean profit)



But what I don't understand is the the iPod touch at $299. Leads me to believe that Apple could very well release a 8gig mini at $329 which is just not enough space. How many people are going to pass up a 16gig iPad mini for $30 more over the overpriced touch? And the only reason I said A5 and not the A6 is because I highly doubt Apple will make the mini faster than the iPad 3 unless Apple is revising it as well. There will be no need to have a power hungry A5X chip in the mini at 1024x768 resolution and the A5 does fine at that resolution.

And many people tend to forget that Amazon still has their 16gig 8.9" Fire HD with 1900x1200 resolution and $299 price tag coming out on 11/20.

If you are right...Apple will fail to reduce the market share of android tablets. More expensive, less features, lower specifications than the competition. Does not sound like a recipe for success. The Ipad 3 is the best in its segment, no doubt about it, but with the specification you have listed, the iPad Mini will be a joke.
 
i Just sold my iPad 3.

i find the whole ipad idea a complete waste of money and effort.

using it is cumbersome with the tiny buttons on the menus which always seem to be in the worst possible places when holding the device.

The Keyboard sucks and is a chore to type on.

Safari never remembers anything especially passwords and logins.

An ipad mini wont fix any of these glaring problems so i guess im out for good.

Ill wait for a Haswell x86 Windows 8 slate which will be a real tablet computer and not an oversized ipod touch
What's so great about a laplet? Might as well get an Ultrabook. Sorry but anyone who rally believes Surface Pro will take the place of a laptop or desktop is fooling themselves.
 
I find it funny that people thought the prices would be lower. The 8gb Ipod is $199 and this is 3 times that size so $299 or $329 is about right.

But I wouldnt sell my ipad 3 for it. I might trade my 3 for a new adpater 3 so my phone and ipad are the same but less screen no thank you.

Smaller ipad seems like a chick thing to me for reading in bed and etc. Like my wife has the nook color. I hold that thing and feel like I'm holding a ipod.

Kinda like when deciding for the 13" or 15" macbook pro. Its the 15" all the way. Unless of course money is the issue then that is a different story.
 
If it has retina display and starts at 16 gb at 329 think il be persuaded but it's iPad 2 display with 8 gb I'm out
 
Are you kidding me everybody? That's $30 more than the new iPod touch... What exactly are you all complaining about? It's $160 cheaper, I mean seriously goodbye surface.
 
Should have been $299. Not sure how to feel about this one.

No, it should have been $199 to kill off the other $199 to $250 tablets. But without any additional services or guaranteed app purchases Apple has to overcharge. Also remember that many people already have iPad's with iPad apps. Apple collects no additional money from you if you bought an App for a previous iPad. $299 to $330 was fine before the Nexus 7 and the Amazon Fire came out.
 
Well I guess Apple doesn't care about letting Amazon and Google continue to make inroads in the tablet market. $329 is too high for what the iPad Mini could've accomplished. At $249 they could have stopped the Kindle and Nexus dead in their tracks.
 
Wow, really hope this is wrong. Isn't the whole point of a "mini" iPad to expand market share and not cede ground to Amazon, Google, etc? If it's that much higher than the competition, that's going to be rough and there's going to be a whole lot of people looking for cheap tablets who are not even going to consider one at that point. If it's more expensive but somewhat competitive, Apple can tout its advantages, but this is not even in the same realm.

Not happy about this if true, for one thing I can already tell my AAPL stock is going to get hammered over it (even more than it has been recently).

I think you, and most others here, don't understand this at all. The iPad mini is NOT to extend market share, Apple is not "loosing ground" to Amazon or Google, those toys have not much in common with iPads.
If anyone even consideres iPad vs Nexus, hey, go get the nexus (I got one here and well, no) you will, if you really want to use a tablet, come back to the iPad anyway. The costumer that changes the eco system, the most popular OS and forgets about a vast accessory market for the sake of $30 is hardly the user Apple is after.
Apple is not putting this thing out for market share. They putting it out to make profits. Five years ago Steve Jobs said in the presentation of the iPhone that Apple hopes to eventually capture 1 (in words one) % of the mobile phone market. He and Apple could live with that.

They passed that mark by now worldwide und made it the richest company on the planet. They did not compete with anyone when the iPad was introduced. They created the market and untill this day nobody can come close to it. The iPad mini (if it really comes) would simply give the clients a bit more choice. And more money for Apple.

The price for a new Apple or indeed a i Produkt is really secondary. It will have something nobody else has and already the price is ok.

Lastly, where did your AAPL get battered? You have a presentation next week so traditionally the stock goes down simply to go back up shortly after. So? I bought at $13 and really can not even see the beginning of a hammering.
 
Last edited:
I thought they were trying to compete with all those e-readers? This is disappointing. At $250, I was planning on buying one for me and one for my wife, but at $350, I doubt I'll be buying one at all. What a shame… I've wanted an iPad for so long and I thought the mini would be my chance.
 
I'm not sure why people assume $329 is for 8GB.

Since there are 3 models, it should be 16/32/64GB, like the full size iPad and iPhone.

$329 for 16GB is a good price, slightly below what I expected ($349).

That's only $79 more than the equivalent Nexus 7 tablet, which has worse build quality and a considerably smaller screen.

Image

Given Apple's solid tablet ecosystem, mindshare and possible cannibalization of their bigger iPad, they would have been crazy to sell this with minimal margin like Google does.

Good point. Convinced me that this was a fair price.
 
Severely Disappointing

I had no hopes Apple would hit the $199 mark, but I'd hoped the 8GB no LTE mini should be $249. That would have really been tough for the competition. Even $299 would be ok, but $329 just looks chintzy. Your competitors are giving it away for free, you can swallow the $20.

Is this rumor coming from the leaked UK prices article? Have there been any updating sources? Or are we just running with it?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.