Shove an A25X and 16 gb RAM in there but the software still doesn't really take advantage of the hardware
Pointless, yes, as there’s really no point to offering a better system for the same price. They should have kept the same iPad Pro, no retooling of the production line or adding additional capabilities. They’re making less per iPad Pro now and if the point is profit, then they certainly lost THAT point.Replace “money grab” with “pointless“ then.
ONLY if you get the 2018 one with a decent discount... maybe 20% or so?That’s why 2018 Pro is still the best Pro to get.
Customers walking into an Apple store or Best Buy will feel a lot more secure purchasing an iPad released in March 2020 than one released in October 2018. That’s why they released tiny speck bumps, so that way people will be buying something that’s new, not something from two years ago. it’s all about the marketing, it’s easier to market something that’s new, rather than something that’s almost 2 years old.Replace “money grab” with “pointless“ then.
$250.00 saving is good enough for me.Pointless, yes, as there’s really no point to offering a better system for the same price. They should have kept the same iPad Pro, no retooling of the production line or adding additional capabilities. They’re making less per iPad Pro now and if the point is profit, then they certainly lost THAT point.
ONLY if you get the 2018 one with a decent discount... maybe 20% or so?
No one should think that if they see a 2018 and a 2020 side by side, same price, that they should get the 2018.
Pointless, yes, as there’s really no point to offering a better system for the same price. They should have kept the same iPad Pro, no retooling of the production line or adding additional capabilities. They’re making less per iPad Pro now and if the point is profit, then they certainly lost THAT point.
ONLY if you get the 2018 one with a decent discount... maybe 20% or so?
No one should think that if they see a 2018 and a 2020 side by side, same price, that they should get the 2018.
I think they mean that “the information” travels faster, due to a higher bandwidth.MacRumors, please correct your lack of physics knowledge. All electromagnetic radiation travels at the same speed in any given medium. To say that mmWave is faster or slower is simply incorrect. Higher frequencies can hold more information, but they don't travel faster.
If I understand correctly, Micro LED is not “an LED behind every LCD pixel”, as there is no LCD involved. It’s just a big array of LEDs, with separate LEDs for every pixel. So, instead of thousands of LED backlights, there’s millions of LEDs providing the actual image.Micro LED is an LED behind every single LCD pixel and what is expected to replace OLED...
bump the ram, better graphics, slim the bezels
bump the ram, better graphics, slim the bezels
I don't understand why people need a cellular iPad when they can tether to their iPhones.
There will never be a time when something better isn’t on the way.wow. This must make any idiot who recently shelled out $1,600 for a new loaded iPad Pro for the upgraded Tri-Lens camera.
thank god I didn’t and was able to resist the urge.
I don't understand why people need a cellular iPad when they can tether to their iPhones.
The S10, S20 & latest OnePlus have better OLED displays.
It’s just too troublesome, further drains the battery of your iPhone, and defeats the spontaneity of the iPad (since it’s so quick to unlock and use).
For someone outside and on the go, I find that the extra cost of the cellular version and the monthly data plan is well worth the convenience.
My iPad is on a 30gb/month data plan that i currently share with my iPhone. Even on a heavy month, I use just over 10+ gb a month.but the data plans are so low that it cripples the usage
wow. This must make any idiot who recently shelled out $1,600 for a new loaded iPad Pro for the upgraded Tri-Lens camera.
thank god I didn’t and was able to resist the urge.
Likely because iPad felt pressure to release something seeing as it was said to come in October 2019.How does that work with the recently launched iPad Pro? We just forked out $,$$$ for LiDar (not many uses...) and Magic Keyboard.
By all accounts and reviews we just experienced a 'minor tweak' to the 2018 model, and a year later there's to be another refresh?...
Australian readers will probably agree that we feel the added pinch of the FX conversion - and that's probably what makes us bitter.
Correct, but internet speed is measured in bits per second, not meters per second. It is not faster as in how fast the electromagnetic radiation travels over a distance. It's faster in how long it takes to download a large file due to the larger amount of information transmitted at a time. Why? Because electromagnetic radiation travels at the speed of light, which through optic fibre, is approximately 2x10^8 m/s, and the distance to travel half way around the world is 20,000 km, and thus the time taken for electromagnetic radiation to travel across the planet in optic fibre is 0.1s, and thus, the speed in m/s is not the important part of internet speed, it's the bandwidth that's important. This is why we can have live video chats with people on the other side of the planet, because the delay is only 0.1s each way, just as long as you have enough bandwidth to carry the full video signal.MacRumors, please correct your lack of physics knowledge. All electromagnetic radiation travels at the same speed in any given medium. To say that mmWave is faster or slower is simply incorrect. Higher frequencies can hold more information, but they don't travel faster.