Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because it doesn't need it.

iPad Pro needs what it gets for use cases. iPhone does not "need" USB-C for anything at all. You simply want USB-C because you want a (sort of) one connector existence.
iPhone most definitely needs it. Stupid that you have multiple charging cords. Just update them all to USB-C and be done with it. Jobs liked to keep thing simple and this is a simple and easy as you can make it.
 
I hope the better cameras means the same cameras as the iPhone 12 Pro. In any case the new mini-LED will ensure I order on day 1, as the iPad Pro is my main device for work and leisure
Agreed. A lotta folks balk at the idea of an iPad being a good camera, and maybe its size is not ideal. But for folks that don't want or need to invest in higher end gear, an iPad on a tripod or a gimbal mount could be great for seeing a large image while shooting, plus all the menu items associated with iOS camera apps. I could see using both my iPhone 11pro in-hand for quick stills and the iPad for video while on set.
 
Is Thunderbolt 4 (the one that can be used without an Intel processor) backwards compatible with Thunderbolt 3? Can you use a 5K ultra fine display with it? If so it may be time to upgrade from my 2018.
(Edit: Wrong information)
 
Last edited:
Of course they'll have Thunderbolt. What a shame it would be to design your own Thunderbolt controller and then not use it in all your computers.
 
iPhone most definitely needs it. Stupid that you have multiple charging cords. Just update them all to USB-C and be done with it. Jobs liked to keep thing simple and this is a simple and easy as you can make it.
That isn't a need, that's a want by a vocal minority.

There is no real need for Apple to change from Lightning to USB-C for iPhones. The next move they will make is to remove the port entirely and not replace it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.