I'm not making some point about rights: he of course, within Macrumors rules, has the right to say whatever he wants. I'm saying that he, and others who make similar posts, are "that guy." You know, like when 4 people are having a discussion about the cinematography in movie and one of them keeps butting in every five minutes to declare "that movie sucks." 1) You only need to say that once, and 2) nobody was talking about whether they thought the movie sucked or not, they were talking about its cinematography. Nobody likes that guy, and not because he has a differing opinion, but because he just can't follow conversational standards.
Hehe, yeah, I know "that guy". And you're right, he's a douche. I can totally see your point, but you just gotta keep scrolling man. I mean, c'mon, you got all CAPS LOCK angry about someone sounding off about how they think the iPad sucks. It works both ways, try starting a thread round here that critically assesses the iPad and in seconds you'll have an army of fanboy nazis doing the exact same thing that annoys you so much.
And as for conversational standards; on this new-fangled and "magical" interweb, "conversational standards" don't apply as they would in the real world. Most threads on most forums have multiple conversations going on, I tend to scroll through to the ones I'm following. It's no big hassle, in fact it's expected. No need to get so worked up!