As compared to your passive aggressive strawman statement?Should they not have included 802.11ac or 5GHz bands either? These routers are about to start becoming the norm very quickly. This seems like a poorly thought out and short sighted statement.
No, I said the iPhone 12, not every Apple iPhone ever made. That being said, 2G was an unfortunate choice for the first iPhone. Apple fixed that with the very next iPhone.What apple phones did not have the latest and greatest? Really? You want a list of features that were late to the game? Try 3G? LTE? 5G? OLED? Let’s start there.
High refresh rates weren't really a thing until 2019 and even then it was a battery suck with a toggle switch. Rumors have Apple working on high refresh rate iPhones at least back to 2018, but not being satisfied with their battery consumption. The forums seems split as to whether or not 120Hz display is all that important.Oh. And iPhone 12 doesn’t have high refresh rates. Competition has had it for years.
They might become the norm for commercial deployment, but unless you have to have the latest tech in your home and are wiling to pay for it, consumer uptake is just not going to be that great. 802.11AC serves the purpose for the vast majority of consumers now and even 802.11N works for a lot of people. The cost of Wi-Fi 6 routers ($229 and up) is just too expensive compared to Wi-Fi 5 routers that most people would find perfectly fine for their homes and small businesses. Once Wi-Fi 6 routers come down in price or become the norm in internet equipment from the ISP, then they'll see more uptake. Until then, they'll be niche.Should they not have included 802.11ac or 5GHz bands either? These routers are about to start becoming the norm very quickly. This seems like a poorly thought out and short sighted statement.
The routers and access points exist. People just don't upgrade routers unless there is a reason to. WiFi 6 existence isn't a reason to.Then Apple should make an AirPort to go with it.
This. Probably 95% of people just use their ISP provided equipment which only gets upgraded when they shift from ADSL>CABLE>FIBREOnce Wi-Fi 6 routers <snip> become the norm in internet equipment from the ISP, then they'll see more uptake. Until then, they'll be niche.
Of course range is better than speed.
Most people I know don't even have a 5 GHz network and are still stuck with 2,4 GHz.
WiFi 6 is being rapidly adopted, you can find affordable WiFi 6 routers quite easily. WiFi 6E will be widely adopted in the next few years, you might have issues affording a new router but we don't all have those same limitations.They might become the norm for commercial deployment, but unless you have to have the latest tech in your home and are wiling to pay for it, consumer uptake is just not going to be that great. 802.11AC serves the purpose for the vast majority of consumers now and even 802.11N works for a lot of people. The cost of Wi-Fi 6 routers ($229 and up) is just too expensive compared to Wi-Fi 5 routers that most people would find perfectly fine for their homes and small businesses. Once Wi-Fi 6 routers come down in price or become the norm in internet equipment from the ISP, then they'll see more uptake. Until then, they'll be niche.
wifi 6 , afaik, main advantage is how it handles multiple devices not speed although it has speed advantageIs WiFi-6E anything like 4GE and 5GE? As in really just WiFi-5 with a little polish?![]()
You can't. It needs a new WiFi radio modem chip that specifically supports the 6 GHz band used by WiFi 6e. WiFi 6 routers that support 802.11ax only support the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands.I love the speed of my Wi-Fi 6 router. I do not know if Linksys have upgrade my software for 6E wi-fi. The speed and stability I getting I am happy with, so I do not really care to inquire about the 6E.
Sure, with commercial customers.WiFi 6 is being rapidly adopted, you can find affordable WiFi 6 routers quite easily. WiFi 6E will be widely adopted in the next few years, you might have issues affording a new router but we don't all have those same limitations.
4GE and 5GE aren't an actual technology, just marketing. They're just 4G and 5G.Is WiFi-6E anything like 4GE and 5GE? As in really just WiFi-5 with a little polish?![]()
Yes, in reality 4GE and 5GE were more like 3G and 4G with a little AT&T marketing sprinkled on top.4GE and 5GE aren't an actual technology, just marketing. They're just 4G and 5G.
Would be great for future-proofing since 6E is the real Wi-Fi 6.
The iPhone 13 set to launch later this year will feature the improved WiFi 6E protocol, offering users access to an extended version of the WiFi 6 framework with the added benefit of a 6GHz band, according to DigiTimes.
![]()
Apple introduced WiFi 6 with the iPhone 11 in 2019, and compared to the previous WiFi 5 framework, WiFi 6 offers significantly improved speeds and security. WiFi 6E adds minimal changes compared to WiFi 6 except for an added 6GHz band, which will result in increased bandwidth and less interference for devices that support Wi-Fi 6E.
DigiTimes says that as Apple plans to include the newer framework in this year's flagship model, it will slowly become the standard for iOS and Android devices next year, despite only being announced early last year.
Today's report also further reiterates past reports that the LiDAR sensor, currently exclusive to the high-end Pro and Pro Max iPhone 12 models, will remain exclusive to those variants. Reports earlier in the year casted the possibility of LiDAR expanding to all models of the lineup; however, that's increasingly unlikely to be the case.
The iPhone 13 is expected to be a minor upgrade compared to the iPhone 12, with rumors of more advanced displays, improved cameras, and a smaller notch. Learn more about what we're expecting for this year's new iPhone.
Article Link: iPhone 13 Rumored to Feature WiFi-6E Offering Improved Speed and Range