Phones are largely sold on monthly payments. for a few bucks more/month, you can have the latest/greatest. Why WOULD you go for old hardware and new pricing when you can have new/new with very little additional obligation?
Apple will never do it, but they should just offer an iPhone Pro Mini, iPhone Pro, and iPhone Pro Max. If the Mini battery is too small to support all the Pro features (shouldn't be as big of a deal with the jump to 3nm on A17) then make it 5.6", just slightly bigger to accommodate a slightly larger battery. This would streamline the lineup.Consumers say, we’ll, if I’m going to spend 900 dollars might as well spend the extra 200 and get the Pro Max with all the new features.
And it’s possible that the average consumer is more tech savvy than we thought or they have tech savvy family members informing their decisions.
They are aware that the Plus has last years SoC and decide that it’s ridiculous to buy last year’s technology at that price.
It will be surprising if this strategy survives next years rev. Apple might end up dropping the Plus and keep the standard 6.1, 6.1 Pro and 6.7 Pro Max instead.
Where are all the mini haters that said the mini failed because people don’t want a small phone? Turns out people just don’t want a non-pro phone regardless of size.
Give us a Pro mini, Apple.
It’s very easy for average consumer to see the pretty stainless steel and third camera is worthy of $200.Consumers say, we’ll, if I’m going to spend 900 dollars might as well spend the extra 200 and get the Pro Max with all the new features.
And it’s possible that the average consumer is more tech savvy than we thought or they have tech savvy family members informing their decisions.
They are aware that the Plus has last years SoC and decide that it’s ridiculous to buy last year’s technology at that price.
It will be surprising if this strategy survives next years rev. Apple might end up dropping the Plus and keep the standard 6.1, 6.1 Pro and 6.7 Pro Max instead.
Well when you put it THAT way….Chances are this will be like the XR which also released a month later. It missed the initial fan fair due to the early adopters going for the XS but ended up being the best seller overall that year due to the price to features ratio when all the normal non tech nerds upgrades were coming up.
In the US the Plus vs Max argument is much closer due to a much closer price gap, but as I’ve said in another post over here in the UK the Plus is £250 cheaper than the Max and that makes the Plus a more tempting device.
When I got my 12 Pro Max battery life and screen size were my push for the bigger most expensive model, now people have the choice of a phone that is £250 cheaper which also has the battery life and screen size but not missing a huge amount vs the Max.
If you were to walk into the Apple Store with £1200 would you go for a Pro Max, or a Plus with a pair of AirPods Pro or Apple Watch SE.
Or to phrase it another way is the slightly faster processor, brighter smoother screen, & better camera worth a pair of AirPods Pro or an Apple Watch.
Most people don't update every year. Everyone I know updates every 4 - 5 years, and all of them would rather buy an iPhone 13 for less money, especially since it's the same phone.
Oh good. I have a 13 mini I need to sell 😁Meanwhile the iPhone mini price keeps going up on Amazon. There's clearly a lot of demand for a smaller sized phone.
I’m still trying to see what the benefit of a Pro Mini is considering that the demographic it targets is not even asking for Pro features. I think a return to maybe a 5.8 would be a good common ground for most users who do not want to go into to Pro territory.Apple will never do it, but they should just offer an iPhone Pro Mini, iPhone Pro, and iPhone Pro Max. If the Mini battery is too small to support all the Pro features (shouldn't be as big of a deal with the jump to 3nm on A17) then make it 5.6", just slightly bigger to accommodate a slightly larger battery. This would streamline the lineup.
Most are already spending that 200 each month on coffee anyway. 😄 I see a lot of people who you wouldn’t define as Pro users with the Pro Max anyway. Apple probably should reconsider the branding and just make all phones Pro and differentiate by pricing.It’s very easy for average consumer to see the pretty stainless steel and third camera is worthy of $200.
Exactly right: “I’m already going to spend $900, why not $1099! Treat myself!”