Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can we stop regurgitating this futureproofing nonsense especially on phones? LPDDR5 memory brings next to nothing in terms of performance and only serves to improve efficiency.

It is pure nonsense to "futureproof" your phone, which you probably only use for browsing social media and Safari.

LPDDR4X has been the industry standard for a while now on both laptops (like M1) and especially phones. Your phone won't suddenly not work or slow down to a literal halt just because you got LPDDR4X instead of LPDDR5... 🤦‍♂️
We’ll be able to open apps 25% faster, and have up to 300 apps and tabs open at the same time, delivering an experience only Apple can provide.

Sounds pretty future-proof to me.

LPDDR4X is old news. SNORE!!! ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz
 
That pro will sell like gangbusters if it’s that shade of purple. 🤯
 
Good for a product longevity (future-proofing), but largely irrelevant today, as everything iPhone-related will still need to work reasonably well on the lowest-end iPhones sold and their lower amount of RAM (iPhone SE and 11).

That's why I am starting to question, getting the "Pro" besides its longevity. App developers obviously want to make sure, their Apps still run fine on the lowest supported iOS 16 device. Therefore, the advantages in every day usage will be limited. Are there many Apps taking advantage of the M1 on iPad for example?
 
We’ll be able to open apps 25% faster, and have up to 300 apps and tabs open at the same time, delivering an experience only Apple can provide.

Sounds pretty future-proof to me.

LPDDR4X is old news. SNORE!!! ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz
Think you should put an /s so that nobody takes what you said at face value lmao
 
Last edited:
The pros really could stand to use 8 GB… but Apple is going Apple and skimp out I see.
Obviously, Apple is going to delay the jump to 8GB as much as possible, because of what that means: Once they reach 8GB, it will be much harder and unusual to go higher (remember, base Mac models still start at 8GB) and, thus, the lifespan of such devices will be huge. So, putting just 6GB is a way of planning the obsolescence of this generations going forward.

It will become harder to stop supporting older iPhones using RAM as a factor once they reach 8GB. So they have to delay it as much as possible.

Hopefully, the iPhone 15 Pro will come with Periscope Lenses, USB-C, and 8GB of RAM.
 
I wouldn’t get too excited let’s not forget that unlike android phones Apple is tuning and optimising the OS so much that anything more than 1-2 GB of RAM is just a gimmick and most likely primarily a marketing tactic.
Imo it's not marketing gimmick. Yes, iOS 12 era or so, more than 2GB RAM might be unnecessary. However, now is different. 3GB RAM is already required for multi lens camera system (started with the 7+). Also, apps are getting more demanding. I actually am getting out or memory errors from some games now on my 7+, requiring me to force quite apps. So it's getting there. It won't surprise me that ios17 might require 4GB RAM minimum.

The joke will be, of course, when iphone gets 8GB RAM, but a MacBook pro base model still has only 8GB RAM as well.
 
But it is still supported in ios16. So Apple will still need to optimize ios16 for at least devices with 2GB of RAM.
The more I think about it, what Apple is doing is just stripping out a bunch of features, do some automated tests and call it a day. Hardly any “optimisation” is done nowadays.
I wouldn’t get too excited let’s not forget that unlike android phones Apple is tuning and optimising the OS so much that anything more than 1-2 GB of RAM is just a gimmick and most likely primarily a marketing tactic.
We have long past the time where every byte of 4KB RAM must count, or the time where software must be optimised to the tilt just to get the edge it needs to run some features fast enough. Apple silicon has so much headroom, when a feature works, it usually also runs at decent speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vtuberalpha and JM
Think you should an /s so that nobody takes what you said at face value lmao
Why though? You understood it 🤣

I think your reminder about better battery life with the “5” ram over the “4”, is a pretty good reason to have it.

I’ve only recently learned about how the larger storage spaces have faster read/write speeds, so additional efficiencies baked into the hardware I’m looking forward to in the future.
 
Are there many Apps taking advantage of the M1 on iPad for example?
No. But at the same time, Apple will make use of all the power in M1 without user installing any demanding apps. I am fairly confident on that.
 
Oh I am well aware of the wonderful 13 Pro Max launch with the amazing Cinematic video mode that was hyped till the cows came home and then later absolutely no one ended up using it. It also never got any kind of update (e.g. 24fps). Nothing.
Cinematic mode is quite popular lol maybe try getting out of that basement
 
That's why I am starting to question, getting the "Pro" besides its longevity. App developers obviously want to make sure, their Apps still run fine on the lowest supported iOS 16 device. Therefore, the advantages in every day usage will be limited. Are there many Apps taking advantage of the M1 on iPad for example?

Agreed, the only Pro Apple product I have is a 2015 MBP and it is only due to its retina screen. If I was buying a Mac today it would certainly be a MBA instead. All my other Apple gear is “regular” - iPhone 12 mini, iPad Air 4 and AirPods 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Premium1
I understand Apple isn’t targeting the 14 Pro for those with the 13 Pro, but between the lack of USB-C, lack of major design changes, lack of increased RAM, and the A16 rumored to be staying on 5nm (N5P), the 14 Pro is looking even more iterative to the 13 Pro than the 13 Pro was to the 12 Pro.
 
Last edited:
The non-pro iPhone 14 will be a dud, either grab a 13 or wait it out another year. I’m upgrading from an XS to a 13 next week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Premium1
That's why I am starting to question, getting the "Pro" besides its longevity. App developers obviously want to make sure, their Apps still run fine on the lowest supported iOS 16 device. Therefore, the advantages in every day usage will be limited. Are there many Apps taking advantage of the M1 on iPad for example?
Honestly outside of 120hz screen, the pro isn't really worth it in most cases. Maybe one day the entire lineup will have 120hz (since even cheap androids are getting them now), but then again that would make it harder for apple to upsell people to the pros if they did that.
 
I still think the "regular" iPhone 14 will get a faster version of the A15 SoC. That way, they may be actually slightly faster than the iPhone 13 Pro. The iPhone 14 Pro will definitely be faster not only with the faster RAM, but also the new, faster A16 SoC.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: UltimaKilo
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.