Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I hope there were new batteries, not the same ones they used in 14 Pro, which lost 10% of its health after a year...
lucky, just checked and mine is at 87%, which feels overstated based on how quickly it drains. my favorite is leaving it off the charger over night at 60%+ and waking up to it being just over 20%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eelynek
It could also be due to the fact most of us use fast chargers, and wireless chargers now.. and neither is as good for our phones as those slow 5w bricks.

It’s the 20W USB-C charger safe to use every day or it will degrade the battery faster?

To use the 5W charger with 15PM get a USB-A to USB-C cable.

It will take 5 hrs to charge if the 13PM is of any indicator. Good way to charge when sleeping.

I'd look for a 27-35W car fast charger if you want to do 0-50% within 30 mins.

2071281

Is charging with a 5W better (for the non-Pro and non-ProMax) for long-term battery health? Or at least with the minimum watt possible?
Ty!
 
Is charging with a 5W better (for the non-Pro and non-ProMax) for long-term battery health? Or at least with the minimum watt possible?
Ty!
I charge with a 12W charger overnight for my all my iPhones for the last decade. My nearly 2yo 13 Pro Max has 97% battery health and I am replacing by October with a 15 Pro Max.

I use a 30W car charger when I'm in a rush or else I just use the 5W port of my car for wired CarPlay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RaphaZ
Or Apple intentionally tweak the software to hide battery degradation from customer and use that to refuse battery replacement until AppleCare or limited warranty runs out. They can then charge money for battery replacement.
If they were intentionally doing that, they would already be sued. They already got sued for tweaking the CPU speed, so that it wouldn't crash when the CPU requested more voltage than the battery could deliver.
 
Also at 98% here on day one 14PM, I charge mine with a 5W or 10W charger, try not to let it get under 15% or so, and that’s about it. Battery life hasn’t been quite as good as my 13 PM but definitely not bad by any means. I attribute it to the always on display

Anyone having battery life issues: do you have background app refresh on? I’ve kept it off globally on every iPhone I’ve had, idk if that helps but it doesn’t cause me any inconveniences, I don’t even notice ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ everything I expect to run in the background still does
 
why 100mAh?

iPhone 14 Pro Max: 4323mAh
iPhone 15 Pro MAx: 4852mAh

529mAh

but if I misunderstood, I apologize, maybe you were talking about something else.
The article says:

  • iPhone 15 Pro Max: 4,422mAh
  • iPhone 14 Pro Max: 4,323 mAh
Just curious, where did you see 4852?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark.g4
People with fully discharged phones remind me of drivers with a gas can on the side of the road. It shouldn’t happen to a normal person.
I am a lost for words. Are you saying that "normal people" don't experience that their phones run out of battery????
 
I am a lost for words. Are you saying that "normal people" don't experience that their phones run out of battery????

Fully discharged, no. They usually understand the idea of preserving that last few percent for emergency calls or texts.
 
ok, I saw that the battery will probably be smaller than what I had read, thanks for reporting.
I read the article quickly without focusing too much on the numbers, which I had already read on phone arena.
 
So the 3nm chips bring no improvements to the party… why change and make so much fuss about it if it was not going to provide any significant improvements?. Did they really change to 3nm?
 
So the 3nm chips bring no improvements to the party… why change and make so much fuss about it if it was not going to provide any significant improvements?. Did they really change to 3nm?
Well, they certainly bring more performance which has been indicated.. anywhere from 15-30% depending on the task. What we DON’T yet know is what level of overall efficiency they provide. they SHOULD provide some amount, 10-15% overall for low performance tasks, or idle tasks, but we just don’t know.
 
Well, they certainly bring more performance which has been indicated.. anywhere from 15-30% depending on the task. What we DON’T yet know is what level of overall efficiency they provide. they SHOULD provide some amount, 10-15% overall for low performance tasks, or idle tasks, but we just don’t know.

Where are you getting 30% from?

1694798633360.jpeg
 
Great news. I’m hoping Apple is underestimating their battery life estimates. An increased battery capacity combined with what should be a more efficient chip and no changes to display should mean increased battery life.
iOS 17 will use more energy than iOS 16, especially with those interactive widgets that will draw more power; it won't be a lot, but enough to be perceived by the user when the battery discharges faster. So they play safe and don't announce any battery life improvement.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.