what are you talking about, this is totally the case! it's not like fast wireless charging technology doesn't yet exist, they just decided to cripple it so they can have something "new" to tout about next year. it's good business, just sucks for the consumer
I think it’ll be the best decision you make! It’s a far gone conclusion by now that iPhones are only for folks that are into the iOS ecosystem, because that’s the only thing one can’t easily replicate on an Android phone.
For a 3 trillion dollar tech company… one doesn’t even have to go any further in the sentence, apparently being behind everyone is is the right thing to be LOLFor a 3 trillion dollar tech company, it's surprising that they manage to always be behind everyone else. At least the new CPU is 10% faster though
It essentially says fast charging is naturally detrimental to the battery, primarily due to the heat generated. As a result, companies have to deal with that heat and they’ve done so in different ways. In the end, fast charging phones haven’t been on the market long enough to confirm that one method or another is actually successful in limiting battery degradation. If the issue is JUST the heat, it will be borne out. If it’s due to some other process, there will be lucky users helping us to understand more about how fast charging affects batteries.
Some Say Fast Charging Ruins Your Phone Battery, But Here's Why I'm Not Worried
Fast charging will power up your phone in a hurry, but is it safe to use? I've heard people worry about this charging myth, but modern phones have made it less scary than it used to be.www.pcmag.com
www.macrumors.com
So what do you dudes call Ultra Wideband 2? Literally an innovation, and no other smartphone and watch pairing has it. Same with a half dozen other developments, but if you don’t get some blinkin new lights you fail to see it.
Titanium has a low heat conductivity, it won't be helping to dissipate heat. The aluminium phones will actually be better for this.
You’re not the target market for these devices. Most people don’t blow their money on a new phone / watch every year. For me I’m on an X, and this has literally everything I want.
Well, USB-C 2.0 at 0.48 Gbps is year 2000 tech. So they're keep some very rusty old bullets in that chamber. I suspect they will jam, and the base iPhones will be stuck at USB-C 2.0 for a while.
Yeah, except the prices are meant for those who are actually willing to pay for PRO devices. The general disappointment is due to the serious lack of PRO in that Pro. So much old tech in the latest iPhones.
I have a friend with a Pixel 6, which isn't even the latest, and he's shown me some of the cool stuff it can do, which has me jealous as. However, I think they look ugly and plasticy. I am tempted though.
Those Nothing phones look really cool. Only in iPhone Max size though, no good for me, damn it, otherwise I'd be seriously interested.
I sure wish a citation or source was sited for this statement, as the entire point of Qi2 is to enable more efficient transfer for higher power charging.
The A17 Pro is the first chip iPhone chip with USB3 HCI. The USB 2 speeds are based on the A16 having USB 2 hardware support.
The Mini 6 hasn't had a full teardown with chip identification, unfortunately; they could have used a USB3 controller out of package for all we know.
Right. Same for the Lightning-port iPad Pros, which also supported USB3 (even though nobody talks about it when trying to justify the "need" to switch to USB-C).
The A1* chipsets has no connection with connectivity. Even A14 had USB3 via USB-C on Air 4. It's separate controller. Nothing on the A1* die itself. No idea why the said it on the presentation.