nice, Optical is the way to go. I was referring to their 100x digital zoomSamsung has 10x optical. Apple 5x
nice, Optical is the way to go. I was referring to their 100x digital zoomSamsung has 10x optical. Apple 5x
No it won’t lolOk, I’m very excited about this, but I’ll admit I’m disappointed by an increase from 3x to 5x.
I thought the 6x rumors seemed unexciting.
Am I missing something? Is 5x going to be huge?
The capability surprised me too. I just don't think many people will get a Vision Pro, it's way too expensive - hence the lack of reaction. I have no use for "spatial recording" until we can do Minority Report style 3D projection. I don't care in a dopey personal device that does it.I see no article and no one talking about its ability to do spatial recording? 🤯🤯 never would have guess we’d get that already… and how’s that even possible with such short distance between the lenses 🤔
People use zoom for taking pictures of things far away (as all of apples cool marketing pictures try to play on). Apple focusing on portrait mode most people don’t even understand is a non seller.It’s 125mm full frame, which is basically the end of the portraiture focal lengths. Going too much more beyond that and photos of people start to get unflattering. Once you get past 200 you’re talking about sports and wildlife, neither of which a phone is useful for. And it’ll come at a massive cost to image quality.
Big zoom multipliers are for spec sheet comparisons, in the real world they’re not that useful and will come at a cost on every photo you take.
Samsung was also faking photos taken with their zoom, such as photos of the moon, by replacing them with stock photos. They are the worst.Samsung has 10x optical. Apple 5x
It’s 125mm full frame, which is basically the end of the portraiture focal lengths. Going too much more beyond that and photos of people start to get unflattering. Once you get past 200 you’re talking about sports and wildlife, neither of which a phone is useful for. And it’ll come at a massive cost to image quality.
Big zoom multipliers are for spec sheet comparisons, in the real world they’re not that useful and will come at a cost on every photo you take.
I’d definitely like to know more!I see no article and no one talking about its ability to do spatial recording? 🤯🤯 never would have guess we’d get that already… and how’s that even possible with such short distance between the lenses 🤔
I don't really agree. Digital zoom is absolutely a marketing ploy. But if the end result of either digital zoom or using post production software to upres and crop are both mediorce, isn't it a waste of time to not do that in-camera?Digital zoom is a waste of time that can basically be achieved by cropping in post, Or use an application like Topaz AI in post to increase the resolution of the image using AI. In my view digital zoom is a marketing ploy that means absolutely nothing but fools people into believing they are getting something worth having.
Most American are fat right ?This periscope thingy is going to push peoples activity trends ⬇️. I mean, less steps right?
You might wonder if Apple is experiencing an existential identity crisis? Wasn’t turning Apple into a health company supposed to be Timmeh’s legacy? I mean what the hell is going on here?🧐
Next year’s keynote full of Obese people sharing their tragic stories about how they got fat because of periscope? Lmao!
I don’t have the statistics on that and I also don’t like to generalize.Most American are fat right ?
Wait for the comparison test before judging please....Quite disappointed with 5x zoom. S21 ultra that has 10x is almost 3 years old. What a shame, not even 6x as it was rumored.
Patents getting in the way IMHO… 🙁Who even said that iPhone 15 Pro Max will have a periscope zoom lens? FALSE.
That's not what Samsung does. And their 10x is real optical zoom. No need to confuse people.Samsung was also faking photos taken with their zoom, such as photos of the moon, by replacing them with stock photos. They are the worst.
For "Zoom range" they compare the widest optical focal lenth to longest. On thew new Max that is 13 mm to 120 mm so it would really be 9.23 x but close enough.If it's anything like my Pixel 7 Pro it would (from what I read) crop a 12MP shot from the main sensor, re-mosaic the shot and apply some HDR+ scaling for details. Anything up to 10x on these sensors look pretty good with good lighting and minimal motion). A tad soft in comparison to the 5x if you zoom in and pixel peep but solid shots nonetheless.
As I understand Apple does use a periscope lens. They just decided to call it ""tetraprism lens" in line with their tradition to use weird proprietary terminology (super liquid retina anyone?) to pretend that they use some unique technology when in fact they use what everyone else uses (just with a lag).Who even said that iPhone 15 Pro Max will have a periscope zoom lens? FALSE.
That's not an OPTICAL zoom lens. If so, how come the range is only 120mm? It should be 24-120mm instead.As I understand Apple does use a periscope lens. They just decided to call it ""tetraprism lens" in line with their tradition to use weird proprietary terminology (super liquid retina anyone?) to pretend that they use some unique technology when in fact they use what everyone else uses (just with a lag).
You might be surprised at the number of folks that don’t have an application like Topaz AI. For those (several million) people, having Apple do the AI work is better than nothing!Digital zoom is a waste of time that can basically be achieved by cropping in post, Or use an application like Topaz AI in post to increase the resolution of the image using AI.