Captain KuobviousBut what does Captain Obvious aka Kuo have to say about this?
Captain KuobviousBut what does Captain Obvious aka Kuo have to say about this?
It might be that the higher speed forces faster battery degradation.Meanwhile, Android users get 60.
I know Apple does not want to play catchup, but now they are just falling behind industry standards.
I hate it.
That's not actually the point, the point is the W rating is useless and functional outcomes matter more, and that's what I am getting at. At 15W (not fast charging), the iPhone is still thermally throttling charge rates to protect battery life.Just use a power brick not capable of fast charging.
Can you explain to be how you did this? I used a 30 W charger on my iPhonethis statement is false, i’ve been using my day 1 , 14 pro max with anker 150w charger literally every day. and my battery health is 100%
View attachment 2266224
All phones since the iPhone X/8 have peak charged to 29W. Apple only advertised up to 20W.Still better than last 20W
I am buying one. I can be both disappointed and a customer at the same time.So I guess our won't be buying one, huh? How much disappointment can a man stand?
Even if your charger was a 300W charger it wouldn't change the fact that your iPhone would not draw more than 27W.this statement is false, i’ve been using my day 1 , 14 pro max with anker 150w charger literally every day. and my battery health is 100%
View attachment 2266224
The iPhone has less than 30% worldwide market share so majority of people do decide to get an Android phone. My girlfriend's Xiaomi 12s Pro came with a 120W charger while my iPhone Pro Max 12 cannot even do 1/4 of that. The Xiaomi is objectively better in this regard and she did care about this aspect. I have to use a Redmi phone as a secondary phone since Apple blocks me from installing some apps I need but not available in my local app store (developer's decision, but the fact I was able to fix the issue on my Android phone while Apple blocked me).Yeah, why would anybody buy an iPhone when Android is so vastly superior? Oh wait, there's almost 1.5 billion iPhones out there now so somebody is buying them I guess.
They replace the battery, not the phone...I think they're creating an environment for the Redmi owner to replace their phones faster.
Seeming they're a smaller player their branding can take a hit in quality and reliability.
Other phone manufacturers offer cheap phones for those who want to go on their $.35/minute plan and only want to pay $150 for their phone outright. Apple does not offer anything like that. It should be expected that a single manufacturer that doesn't sell cheap phones outright has less than 30% of the market share.The iPhone has less than 30% worldwide market share so majority of people do decide to get an Android phone. My girlfriend's Xiaomi 12s Pro came with a 120W charger while my iPhone Pro Max 12 cannot even do 1/4 of that. The Xiaomi is objectively better in this regard and she did care about this aspect. I have to use a Redmi phone as a secondary phone since Apple blocks me from installing some apps I need but not available in my local app store (developer's decision, but the fact I was able to fix the issue on my Android phone while Apple blocked me).
I think the 13 Pro Max was the first iPhone to hit 27 Watts.All phones since the iPhone X/8 have peak charged to 29W. Apple only advertised up to 20W.
What are you on about??The EU will be on the phone first thing on Monday morning
I have a day 1 14 Pro and use MagSafe almost every time and my battery health is at 88% lol. If anything I think MagSafe is bad for batteries, perhaps because of the additional energy lost to heat?this statement is false, i’ve been using my day 1 , 14 pro max with anker 150w charger literally every day. and my battery health is 100%
View attachment 2266224
I care less about W rating on charging and more about effective results. If at 27W the damn thing throttles (which mine does quite a bit, and I live in a relatively cool climate, and even go so far as to throw the phone on an ice pack when charging, esp when wireless charging, about the only way to get it to charge at max the whole charging curve), I really don't actually want the 35W charging (because that's just spec sheet fun), I want the thermals to improve to maximize the 27W output first along the whole charging curve without having to ensure it's on an ice pack or in a very, very cold room shielded from all possible sources of light/heat.
Hell, take my 27W away but give me 15W but with thermals that keep the throttling at bay.
Hopefully Ti's (on paper) heat dissipation advantage over SS gets us something here (although the internals remain Al....the frame/Ti join does seem to be non-fastener related and is friction welded it appears, which also in theory is good for thermal conductivity).
Mine does 120watt. 0-100 in 25 mins and it's not even warm when charging. It's hard to go back to slower charging now.Meanwhile, Android users get 60.
I know Apple does not want to play catchup, but now they are just falling behind industry standards.
I hate it.
Yeah, why would anybody buy an iPhone when Android is so vastly superior? Oh wait, there's almost 1.5 billion iPhones out there now so somebody is buying them I guess.
*with a 20w-capable cable.this statement is false, i’ve been using my day 1 , 14 pro max with anker 150w charger literally every day. and my battery health is 100%
View attachment 2266224
I have a simple question and how do you have a iPhone 15 Pro? These phones are not released to consumers yet. I am reading between the lines that you have a iPhone 14 Pro. I also have a introductory iPhone 14 Pro and my battery is still at 100% and that is the first iPhone I have had that is still at 100%. I don’t know about my early iPhones has the 3 GS through the 7 I never paid any attention to the battery as long as I could go all day I ignored it.Can you explain to be how you did this? I used a 30 W charger on my iPhone
15 pro and I have 87%.