Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Aluminum has a big advantage over both titanium and stainless steel for heat dissipation. Mind you, I always stuff my phones into a big insulator, in the form of a silicone case. :D
 
I have a 15 PM, and... nothing excites me. I might upgrade, if the carrier deals make it make sense, but - looks like basically identical.
It is always interesting how different people see the same products. Probably because of my focus [yes a bad pun] on the minutiae of camera competence I do not consider the successive iPhone generations to "looks like basically identical."
 
  • Like
Reactions: asparagus
Is iPad Air the top model for iPads? Will you pay the same price or more for a downgraded product?
Just different, not necessarily "a downgraded product." Some buyers will simply prefer thin/light while others will accept thicker/heavier to obtain added camera competence or whatever. And each buyer has his/her own acceptable price points.
 
I have a 15 Pro and will probably wait for the foldable reportedly coming next year. I think an iPad mini that I can carry in my pocket will be more useful to me than the evolutionary updates in the 17 Pro.
 
Looking back at what I wrote above, it seems that some folks will pay more for thin/light, some folks will pay more for thicker with more camera and other folks will pay more for folding and screen real estate

It's looking like that's going to be a dilemma for me. I was all set to purchase a 17 Air assuming reviews from credible reviewers were good, and handling one in an Apple Store sealed the deal.

But... with potential interesting camera improvements in the 17 Pro, I may have to rethink that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatTribble
I don’t see touch ID. So Apple fails again. I wish to see you with the man touch ID on all of their phones. It’s time for Apple to listen to their customers.
Which they never listen and never will. The appearance that they listen is by chance what they listen aligns with what they want to do anyway. Had Apple listened to anything customer says Apple would probably not what some see what Apple should be: a disruptive company that leads the industry forward with proprietary solutions.
 
We are possibly decades away from a crease free foldable phones. Samsung will never lead the industry in anything other than mass production of garbage.
So ok no crease free folding phone. But I don’t get the Samsung producing garbage thing. In some sense Apple is also producing garbage, just better ones that generally lasts long.
 
I am not blind. I see what products other companies have. But yes…aluminium frame is a game changer, agree
Just curiopus. Why do you consider "aluminium frame is a game changer?" To me the material science of each iPhone's design is hella complex, and I do not see why an an aluminum alloy frame this year instead of a titanium alloy frame would be a game changer. Some future iPhone may again use some Ti alloy.

My guess is that evolving Qi/MagSafe design and the material science characteristics of newly available glass types may be more relevant drivers of iPhone design than metal alloys are. The material science characteristics of aluminum and other metal alloys have been known and available to iPhone designers for years.

Note also that I doubt that it will be an aluminum frame; far more likely is that it is an aluminum alloy frame.
 
It's looking like that's going to be a dilemma for me. I was all set to purchase a 17 Air assuming reviews from credible reviewers were good, and handling one in an Apple Store sealed the deal.

But... with potential interesting camera improvements in the 17 Pro, I may have to rethink that.
I've been thinking the Air myself, coming from a 13PM I don't think I want to live without a tele lens, and at the same time, it is unclear what the 17PM tele lens really will be. For me, less than 5x would be a step backwards...
 
Which they never listen and never will. The appearance that they listen is by chance what they listen aligns with what they want to do anyway. Had Apple listened to anything customer says Apple would probably not what some see what Apple should be: a disruptive company that leads the industry forward with proprietary solutions.
I would argue that Apple does listen, which is exactly why they are the world's most successful tech company. The fact that many internet dweebs often do not agree with what Apple apparently hears is quite irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Persecki
I've been thinking the Air myself, coming from a 13PM I don't think I want to live without a tele lens, and at the same time, it is unclear what the 17PM tele lens really will be. For me, less than 5x would be a step backwards...
IMO wait for the new 17 Pros to be available, make a solid platform, set the iPhone to capture RAW and test the new tele. Not how many x it says in some spec, but real-world test. Then edit the stable platform RAW captures on a decent sized display and observe how well you can crop/zoom in for your particular end usage requirements.

Do an identical test with the new Air model if it interests you and compare results for your particular end usage requirements.

That is what I will be doing. And did I mention how critical it is to make a solid platform and set to RAW?
 
I've been thinking the Air myself, coming from a 13PM I don't think I want to live without a tele lens, and at the same time, it is unclear what the 17PM tele lens really will be. For me, less than 5x would be a step backwards...
Yeah... I can see that for some types of photography, such as sports, wildlife, nature, etc.

Most of my photography is about hitting up strangers on the street in cities like San Francisco, for a few portraits and conversation. I've found that a 35mm focal length works best for me so that I have some flexibility in including environmental context.

The only drawback at that focal length, and shooting relatively close, is being aware of potential perspective distortion on subjects. And having to move a little further back to keep that under control.

Still... there are times when a decent tele would be good.
 
Last edited:
I would argue that Apple does listen, which is exactly why they are the world's most successful tech company. The fact that many internet dweebs often do not agree with what Apple apparently hears is quite irrelevant.

Spot-on. Several times in the past I've written to Craig Federighi at Apple with a suggestion or a concern. And have always received a note back with a thank you in return.
 
It's looking like that's going to be a dilemma for me. I was all set to purchase a 17 Air assuming reviews from credible reviewers were good, and handling one in an Apple Store sealed the deal.

But... with potential interesting camera improvements in the 17 Pro, I may have to rethink that.
Yup. For me, the thin/light of an Air will not be very compelling, whereas improved tele capture in the Pro will probably be a big deal. But when a folding iPhone with more screen real estate becomes available the which-iPhone decision will likely become much more difficult for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Aluminum frame is a feature???
Apple is adding "features" in a salami mode and secretly removing real features.
Just one example; it is not possible - due Apple restrictions - to have a real wifi explorer app to show SSID/BSSID, used channel, signal strength, etc like it is possible on Mac or Android. And many other restrictions.
Maybe its time for Tim to take his hat.
 
i might trade in the 16 pro max for it...but i want to see the event and hands on before i fullly decide. If the rumors are true and the Fold comes out in the spring instead of next fall (ive heard conflicting rumors to that) then obviouly just wait for the fold.

Even if i do end up trading in the 16PM for the 17PM, i still intend on trading in that one for the fold when ever it comes out so it just makes sense to see what up with the keynote and the hands on videos.

Im more curious about the Apple Watch Ultra 2, Ipad Pros and even the rumored airpod pros 3
 
IMO wait for the new 17 Pros to be available, make a solid platform, set the iPhone to capture RAW and test the new tele. Not how many x it says in some spec, but real-world test. Then edit the stable platform RAW captures on a decent sized display and observe how well you can crop/zoom in for your particular end usage requirements.

Do an identical test with the new Air model if it interests you and compare results for your particular end usage requirements.

That is what I will be doing. And did I mention how critical it is to make a solid platform and set to RAW?
Well, I shoot in raw on my DSLR which is my main camera, proraw is not quite raw, but certainly better than heic or leave alone jpeg.
But, I use my phone much more of a "snap" camera on most occasions. Of course it has the advantage of always being with me as oppose to my DSLR and while I've played around enough with proraw as well as 3rd part camera apps, I cannot be bothered shooting in raw on my phone barring very rare occasions.
But I agree that i will for one explore the actual specs and most likely do a hands on before deciding whether or not to upgrade my 13PM. Except, if there were a 4th camera ;)
 
Yeah... I can see that for some types of photography, such as sports, wildlife, nature, etc.

Most of my photography is about hitting up strangers on the street in cities like San Francisco, for a few portraits and conversation. I've found that a 35mm focal length works best for me so that I have some flexibility in including environmental context.

The only drawback at that focal length, and shooting relatively close, is being aware of potential perspective distortion on subjects. And having to move a little further back to keep that under control.

Still... there are times when a decent tele would be good.
I do see that. My main object is nature and wildlife and then my children (I consider my pets as my children as my real children are going into their 30 ;)).
Options is a good thing.
 


Apple's iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max should launch in late September, and there are plenty of rumors about the devices.

iPhone-17-Pro-on-Desk-Centered-1.jpg

Below, we recap key changes rumored for the iPhone 17 Pro models, as of July 2025:
Check out our iPhone 17 Pro roundup to learn more.

Article Link: iPhone 17 Pro Launching in Two Months With These 16 New Features


Apple's iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max should launch in late September, and there are plenty of rumors about the devices.

iPhone-17-Pro-on-Desk-Centered-1.jpg

Below, we recap key changes rumored for the iPhone 17 Pro models, as of July 2025:
Check out our iPhone 17 Pro roundup to learn more.

Article Link: iPhone 17 Pro Launching in Two Months With These 16 New Features
I’d rather have a camera bump that is flushed with the phone; as the tech improves the phone & camera shouldn’t the camera get smaller? Other than slight upgrades in ram, memory, Dynamic Island, non reflective display, either redesigned a slimmer phone or just push updates until a redesign is needed (every 2-4 years). I’m good with that. In fact that will create necessity and build anticipation.
 
I used to love my 15 Pro Max (stolen by a pickpocket), so I am super ready for a 17 Pro Max
  1. Better over all cameras,
  2. Better display
  3. Better battery life
  4. Better performance due to more ram and a better chip
  5. Better cooling system
  6. Better wireless charging.
  7. Noticeable design changes.
The only thing that I could ask for is better glass resistance against drops. I always dream of using the iPhone without a cover/case. At most, I would put an extra glass as a glass protector on the front, but this new design is not compatible with a back glass protector.
I’m sure they will have back glass protectors for the 17PM. I have them for the 15PM that look just like the screen protectors except for the back.
 
Will be a worthwhile upgrade for a lot of professionals and small business owners, if the rumors are correct about 12gb ram, larger optical zoom range, improved cooling and increased battery life.
 
Well, I shoot in raw on my DSLR which is my main camera, proraw is not quite raw, but certainly better than heic or leave alone jpeg.
But, I use my phone much more of a "snap" camera on most occasions. Of course it has the advantage of always being with me as oppose to my DSLR and while I've played around enough with proraw as well as 3rd part camera apps, I cannot be bothered shooting in raw on my phone barring very rare occasions.
But I agree that i will for one explore the actual specs and most likely do a hands on before deciding whether or not to upgrade my 13PM. Except, if there were a 4th camera ;)
Regarding "I cannot be bothered shooting in raw on my phone" just set the iPhone to RAW, it is easy and captures better image data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Off the top of my head...

For me (a photographer)... Much better cameras and options. Being able to shoot in Pro RAW providing much better post-processing dynamic range and detail in Lightroom is killer. And recently... easily finding specific photos out of the 28,000+ images I have on my phone. For example search for "red cars with dogs and bicycles" or "beaches and surfers," "women with hats," etc. Also... the Photos app on my iPhone works great for remote post-processing when I don't have a computer/laptop handy.

Also... collision and crash detection with emergency messages automatically sent to responders via messages. Many lives have been saved via that feature. Being able to send a message via satellite if my car breaks down, or I run out of gas in the middle of the Mojave desert or Joshua Tree National Park where there's no cellular service. Fall detection alerting emergency services is also nice.

Edit:

Also... the Fitness app on my iPhone keeps track of my treks I take everyday accumulating loads of data (heart rate over time, calories, distance, workout time, elevation, a route map, etc...) from my Watch. I like that a lot.
Looks like the recent iPhone updates have really boosted your workflow. For me, though, I’m not into photography or videography, so most of those changes don’t really affect how I use my iPhone. Features you mentioned, like picture search and fittness tracking are things I already had through the apps I use. Crash detection and satellite communication are definitely nice to have, but they don’t really change my day-to-day experience with the phone,still, it’s good to know they’re there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.