Nobody wants Touch
This is not true.Nobody wants Touch ID.
Nobody wants Touch
This is not true.Nobody wants Touch ID.
You seem confused, as nobody said anything about variable focal length telephoto. I would suggest you reread my post you quoted because the details are all right there.Nope. The closest to variable focal telephoto is the latest Huawei Pura 80 with a dual telephoto camera.
iPhone sadly is not very advanced or innovative, just put standard lens and sensor and customize in software. Not own camera designs since 10 years ago.
I much prefer Face ID and would never want to go back to Touch ID. But I’d have no problems having Touch ID if it were there as an additional security layer. So if I wanted some extra security to log into my bank, I’d have to use Face ID and a fingerprint.Nobody wants Touch ID.
I prefer Touch ID on the iPhone but prefer Face ID on the iPad, and hence it is one small reason contributing to why I have an iPad Pro.I much prefer Face ID and would never want to go back to Touch ID. But I’d have no problems having Touch ID if it were there as an additional security layer. So if I wanted some extra security to log into my bank, I’d have to use Face ID and a fingerprint.
Those bullet points that I wrote also apply when you compare the new 17 Pro Max against the 16 Max.You’re talking about buying a phone that’s two years newer.
I would certainly hope it’s “better”.
I’m not sure what you’re trying to convey by listing out “everything is better”…
😂
It would actually be a little weird if you had bullet points that were things that were not better or for some reason worse!
Perhaps iOS itself will fall into that category, however.
😬
Will the Qi2 coil get moved down the phone to be centred on the new logo on the backplate rather than half way up and in the middle of the phone.That backplate kind of design is just odd… but knowing Apple it’ll probably look great anyway.
Wrong.Bear in mind that the titanium was just a thin coating on an aluminum frame.
It is. As a matter of fact people want FaceID on the MacBooks to replace TouchID.This is not true.
I see it and it sounds just as silly as before. They buy again because that’s the ecosystem they are stuck in. Not because it is so innovative and new features keep coming.See my above post.
Big words with no substance. Apple pulled a lot of people in in the beginning because Apple had Steve and Jonny holding a vision. The company was very flat and organized. He kept the fat trimmed down.And Apple has been doomed since releasing the first iPhone. I remember all of the: "Who asked for a non-mechanical keyboard on a mobile phone?" Pass...
Actually, before that with: "Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?" Referring to Jobs' iPod introduction.
Nobody has yet been able to articulate what "innovation" is. Other than Apple doesn't do it.
... that’s the ecosystem they are stuck in.
yes that was one of rumour now new rumour is that 17pro max will have 8x zoom native 48mp so yes that why I told not sure because there has been too many conflicting rumourNo. The rumour is 3.5X (native 48 MP) and 7X (48 MP cropped to 12 MP). Neither are digital interpolation.
According to Majin Bu, the iPhone 17 Pro will feature a new Telephoto lens with a 48MP sensor, up from the current 12MP sensor found in the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max. This rumor isn't new – in fact it's been repeatedly claimed by several other sources. However, Bu goes further by claiming that the new lens will offer 3.5x optical zoom (85mm equivalent) instead of the 5x zoom (120mm equivalent) currently available.![]()
iPhone 17 Pro: New 48MP Telephoto Lens May Change How Zoom Works
Apple is reportedly planning a major upgrade to the Telephoto camera in the iPhone 17 Pro, and while it may seem like a step back on paper, the...www.macrumors.com
This focal length is generally better suited for portraits and everyday photography, since it allows users to frame shots without having to move as far away from the subject. However, the big shift allegedly comes from the new 48MP sensor, in that the extra resolution allows for digital cropping to simulate longer focal lengths, offering less quality loss than normal digital zoom.
This is similar to what Apple already does with the main Fusion camera on the iPhone 16, where the 48MP sensor enables a 2x digital crop – marketed as "Telephoto" – that still produces a 12MP image with minimal quality loss.
Telephoto Lens: New Optical Zoom![]()
iPhone 17 Pro: Revolution in Mobile Photography with Advanced Telephoto Lens
The iPhone 17 Pro is set to transform the world of mobile photography. With an advanced telephoto lens and a revolutionary camera module, Apple promises to raise the bar for...majinbuofficial.com
The telephoto lens of the iPhone 17 Pro is the heart of this revolution. Here’s what makes it special:
– Versatile focal length: It shifts from 120 mm (5x optical zoom) to 85 mm (3.5x), perfect for portraits and everyday shots.
– 48-megapixel sensor: Compared to the previous 12-megapixel sensors, it offers optical zoom up to 7x (160 mm) with top-quality images.
Except that from a camera point of view, 3.5X actually makes sense. 3.5X is generally equivalent to 85 mm, which is a very useful portrait lens focal length.yes that was one of rumour now new rumour is that 17pro max will have 8x zoom native 48mp so yes that why I told not sure because there has been too many conflicting rumour
(old rumour was that it will retain 5x) they just keep changing![]()
Tipster: iPhone 17 Pro to Feature 8x Zoom, Pro Camera App, and More
Apple's upcoming iPhone 17 Pro models will have several new camera-related features, according to an anonymous tipster who contacted MacRumors...www.macrumors.com
Not true. The frame is made from a titanium alloy. It is not "just a thin coating on an aluminum frame."Bear in mind that the titanium was just a thin coating on an aluminum frame.
Big words with no substance. Apple pulled a lot of people in in the beginning because Apple had Steve and Jonny holding a vision. The company was very flat and organized. He kept the fat trimmed down.
Today, Apple has more misses than hits, plus their AI snafu from a year ago that we all now know to be falsified and was never even running. Those weren’t the old behaviors and Apple has become more focused on profits than products which actually grant them the former when done properly.
Please do better in your analysis of how well they are doing today other than sales numbers which is only a result of lack of alternative options and ecosystem locking their customers. It’s simple a case of Apple has become the lesser of two evils and not the innovative beacon they once were. T Cook has ensure that and hasn’t picked new people who can come in and shine. Instead they focus on lesser things.
Sure the Air price moving above or similar to the Pro could still make sense from a product segmentation perspective. The thin/light characteristics of the Air will make it a different product in some important ways. Some folks will pay more for thin/light and other folks will pay more for thicker with more camera competence.The Air moving above the Pro would make no sense from a product segmentation perspective. If the Fold has additional features over the Pro, that makes lots of sense, since that damn thing will be at least $2,000...
Indeed. Each year the new phones are better. Each individual simply decides whether or not the cost, etc. of a new phone is worth it to that particular individual. It seems that there are quite a few posters here who want to dis any new phone that they have personally chosen not to purchase. Go figure.Seems like people are encouraged to talk about how the new phones are underwhelming, but discouraged from thinking that the new phones are better. Let the guy be excited about his new phone.
Fully agreed, except for the idea of "something lighter like aluminum." The material science design of an iPhone is very complex, and titanium alloys are often used to overall lighten products like iPhones and high performance airplanes.I don’t understand why some people are so worked up over Apple dropping titanium. Did you really expect Apple to be chained to the use of titanium in their phones forever? Yeah, maybe Apple made the mistake of promoting the titanium in some of their ads too heavily, but Apple sometimes does that. We see how well their AI advertising campaign worked out last year. Even with titanium, the 16 Pro was pushing close to 200g. My stainless steel 14 Pro is 206g for reference. Apple had to turn to something lighter like aluminum with the addition of an extra component like the vapor chamber and who knows what else being added to the 17 Pro/17 Pro Max.