UI is way less glitchy than expected. It's almost perfectly smooth. And it's only the second beta.Running well on that, yeah?
I have the same iPad and have been wondering about how it would handle it (or not).
Also windows management works well.
UI is way less glitchy than expected. It's almost perfectly smooth. And it's only the second beta.Running well on that, yeah?
I have the same iPad and have been wondering about how it would handle it (or not).
That two tone credit card doesn’t make it any better.Now everyone freaking out over this can relax because MR is back to using their render without the visible MagSafe.
View attachment 2525536
If true, it will be really nice. With bigger battery also hoping to see faster wired and MagSafe charging. Expecting the 17 Pro Max to be able to easily last a day after it is fully charged.
No one thought it was shipping with MagSafe visible. People who like to use a clear case have a right to be upset if this is how their new iPhone 17 Pro will look. Though I think it's hideous even without MagSafe visible.Now everyone freaking out over this can relax because MR is back to using their render without the visible MagSafe.
View attachment 2525536
I suspect a key difference between those that get lots of phone life or not relates to how much time is spent using a computer instead of a phone. Everyone is unique, but for me, if I were on FaceTime for two hours then most of that would be on a computer as I find it more pleasant for such things. My phone gets used more when I'm out and about in which case I'm likely too busy with other things to use too much time. Even if I know I'll be sitting around bored somewhere (waiting for my car to be service for example) I bring my MacBook air with me to occupy myself.Try and use FaceTime video for two hours, and tell me how much battery it drained![]()
Counterpoint, clear cases with visible MagSafe rings always looked bad.No one thought it was shipping with MagSafe visible. People who like to use a clear case have a right to be upset if this is how their new iPhone 17 Pro will look. Though I think it's hideous even without MagSafe visible.
Besides what you mention about using it just to make calls and texts, an iPhone 16PM is twice the size (in terms of area) of a Nokia 5125. So increasing thickness has a worse effect.I loved the size of my Nokia 5125. It was brick-like, but felt better to hold in my hand than my iPhone and had all week battery life. Granted it only made phone calls and texts, but still...
Which is not how any of us would ever use a phone. Who presses play and walks away from the device and never touches it again until it is dead?Apple advertises:
Video playback
Up to 33 hours
Video playback (streamed)
Up to 29 hours
Audio playback
Up to 105 hours
Mine lasts a day and a half with 6 to 7 hours of screen time and that’s with a 90% max charge (and low power mode kicking on when the battery hits 19%). I’ve never had any issues with the 16 Pro Max battery life. However, it was terrible on the 15 Pro Max.there is NO WAY that the iPhone 16 Pro Max has a 33 hour battery life, unless you're not actually using it.
My kingdom for a phone that actually lasts all day between charges
Gawd no. The 16PM battery works fine for me, as did the 15P and the 14P. I prefer no additional battery weight or volume please. Of course YMMV and if so you can buy add-on battery capacity from about a zillion vendors.Actually given the size of that camera bump already they might as well just make the whole phone camera bump-depth. That way they could have a really good battery capacity.
Try and use FaceTime video for two hours, and tell me how much battery it drained![]()
Well considering battery capacity grows slower than chip speed that is a Feat.This stuff really never makes a difference for me. Every iPhone I’ve ever owned is at 20% by like 3:00-4:00. Every. Single. One.
Yeah the iPhone doesn't have true hardware bypass right - would love that!My Pixel 9 Pro XL battery is 5060 mAh, plus it has bypass charging. iPhone yet again behind the times.
I strongly disagree.All of them, ridiculous. Phones' battery life should be measured in days, not hours.
Yup. My 16 PM gets through the day just fine, and I take many many photos every day.Can't 16 Pro Max users make it through a day already?
Apple advertises:
Video playback
Up to 33 hours
Video playback (streamed)
Up to 29 hours
Audio playback
Up to 105 hours
You can get the 17 Series but just don’t get the 17 Air because Kuo said Apple’s new C1 modem will definitely be in that one but not the others until next year’s 18 series iPhone.For that reason alone the blog has no credibility. Apple using their own modem is a reminder why I can't let myself be tempted into getting an iPhone 17. I'm using the XS Max.
Have you read up on battery technology lately? You might want to modify your theory.All of them, ridiculous. Phones' battery life should be measured in days, not hours.
Yep, those comments are hilariously unbelievable. Someone is always trying to yank someone else’s chain aren’t they?it's always funny reading these comments.. you know the usual "my 16 pro max only gets 2 hours before its dead!.. unless I don't use it" kek lol 😂
Going to have to disagree on that. MagSafe is fine for occasional use, but if it's going to be on the phone all the time it's an incredibly inefficient way to charge. And I'd prefer something more secure than magnets. It really needs to have a physical lock mechanism and pogo pins.This is the way 👆
I thought this was sort of what they were going for with the "naked robotic core*" design + MagSafe accessories (like battery packs).
I have two of the Apple MagSafe battery packs in my fleet for occasional usage with my 13 Mini. It only is needed a couple times per year (attending sporting events for the day, where the battery gets cooked).
* a John Siracusa saying