All highest tier iPhones have been over $2K for the past decade or so. I understand inflation and the global economy play major factors in pricing. Under $2500 would be nice, under $3k is definitely feasible. I don’t expect to see an iPhone anywhere near $10KAnd priced under 10 grand?
Correct. I should have ended with /s. It may seem there might be a price increase,All highest tier iPhones have been over $2K for the past decade or so. I understand inflation and the global economy play major factors in pricing. Under $2500 would be nice, under $3k is definitely feasible. I don’t expect to see an iPhone anywhere near $10K
Macs run more demanding apps than your phone which is why they got 16GB to run AI, Mac OS, and Mac apps.The AI gig will require ever more "memory" to operate on any device. We got 8GB this year because of AI and the marketing claim this is the first AI compatible iPhone and everyone should upgrade. But wait..... all the other Apple products were upgraded to 16GB of memory for AI.
Folks, I see the 17 series getting 12GB memory upgrade which will be barely adequate and Apple knows this but the 18 series will have the necessary 16GB. This way they hope to sell an extra generation with inadequate specs so great cash flow.
The reality seems to be that Apple and AI are having severe teething problems. It will take at least two more years for a truly operational Apple AI. The peanut gallery has to hope that the 16GB minimum memory in the other iDevices is "enough" or will we find that 32GB is the new enough and obsoletes millions of Apple's computers.
I would be really upset if I had acquired a new Apple Mac with 8GB just to find. out it was obsolete for AI coming out of the box and Apple new that to be the case but they wanted to deplete their known to be obsolete inventory at list prices.
YMMV
Wouldn’t it be great if that were actually a detachable iPhone mini? I think you’re on to somthing.That camera bulge looks so much like an iPhone mini riding on the back.
If it means removing the ugly camera bump and increasing battery life, I’m all for it.Thicker isn't the end lf the world imo. The problem comes when they fill that added thickness with stuff making it even heavier and it's already too heavy.
Exactly, I think weight is the primary issue why they’re ditching titanium. They know people complained about the weight of the stainless steel 14 Pro and 14 Pro Max. Lighter titanium came in to save the day with the 15 Pro and 15 Pro Max. However, even with titanium, the 16 Pro is close to 200g. My 14 Pro is 206g and a titanium 17 Pro prototype probably came close or even hit that weight. They needed another weight “savior” and aluminum is it.To save weight, it’s the reason they went to titanium in the first place. Apple knows their phones are becoming hulking monstrosities and if it is thicker it will most likely be heavier too
Apples design has always been form over function, this iphone 17 appears to be function over formInteresting... Apples design seems to be form over function which is good compared to the issues of the past.
Still a really fugly phone. Lets hope this render isnt realistic.
In the image you posted, the older iPhone looks like a 5 not a 4S.I used my old 4S with iOS 6 for a few days and it's just so refreshing to use a subtle, neat and organized user interface in a comfortable form factor. [...] I don't know, maybe I'm just an old boring dude that just went back to 2011 and preferred it there, but I honestly can't wait for a major iOS redesign and I hope it's going to be more pleasant on the eye and I hope Apple releases another Mini model too.
iPhone 17 BBL MAXSo it’s a choice between the iPhone 17 Anorexic and the iPhone 17 Obese. Neither look good.
I've been saying this all along. Why not just increase the thickness of the phone to make the camera bump flush again. It allows for a cleaner design and a thicker battery. It won't be THAT much heavier.Why can’t it be thicker to accommodate the lenses, so I could finally put my phone down flat on the table!
It is an iPhone 5, yes. It’s a screenshot, not my photo. It’s to highlight the difference in past/current form factor and UI.In the image you posted, the older iPhone looks like a 5 not a 4S.