I would switch to AT&T
Not going to lie that's probably just as low as I said I'd go.
I would switch to AT&T
iPhone 3.0 features are being announced - right? (business-like features, mms, copy and paste <--- i know, this is more of a basic feature)
AT&T exclusivity runs out fairly soon
lead time for FCC registration to product availability approximately 6 months
... with slide out keyboard?
Ugh. No thanks. I love the iPhone's compactness and sleek design, and I don't have to worry about some flimsy tiny pull-out keyboard breaking off, either.
I have no problem with the iPhone's on-screen keyboard -- it works quite well and is FAR more flexible in that the keyboard can change depending on the app (like having a ".com" key when entering a URL). That's impossible with a physical keyboard.
Every other smartphone has a tiny physical keyboard. The iPhone is better because it doesn't.
I believe you misunderstood the context with the telephony point I was making.
"If 160 bytes of SMS data costs twenty cents then 1MB (1,048,576 bytes) of data would cost $1,310.72."
Every other smartphone has a tiny physical keyboard. The iPhone is better because it doesn't.
Maybe you get it now. MMS is on the receivers' phone instantly without any additional cost.
That's what I'm talking about. And don't get me going on about how to teach my mom to use eMail on her phone.
Sure, because you're using packet switched data, not circuit switched. Certainly VOIP over shared paths is the way of the future, but it's not here yet for cell phones. We have to wait for LTE to be used for voice.
Love it or hate it, MMS is needed.
Maybe someday everyone will have phones with access to e-mail. Now is not that time. We need MMS.
Just add copy and paste, and I'll be a happy camper.
Steve Jobs et al disagree that MMS is needed. I used to vehemently believe that MMS was needed, but I was short-sighted. All modern cell phones have email access (that's not to say that all cell phones for sale today are modern, however).
Remember when every computer had a floppy drive? The original iMac changed that. I bought one, even though I thought a floppy drive was a necessity. It turns out Steve was right & I was wrong. Five years ago, no one would have purchased a computer without an optical drive. Now, the last three computers I've purchased didn't have one. I bought an external drive "just in case", but I've used it less than five times.
Steve's opinion appears to be "MMS is outdated. We're going to force the issue.". He thinks the iPhone has enough clout that it can change the rules of the game. He's probably right. I don't think we'll see Flash anytime soon, either. I think Apple has other plans.
Apple made a revolutionary phone not by conforming to existing standards, but by creating new standards. It seems ridiculous that a so-called modern web-enabled phone would ship without MMS and Flash, but now I think Apple may change everything and have the last laugh.
We don't need floppy drives. We don't need CDs or DVDs. We don't need MMS and we don't need Flash. Pardon the Simpsons reference, but Steve Mobs "is like a god who knows what we want". If we had needed MMS and Flash, Steve would have given it to us.
Who's still using a rotary dial phone?
There sure are a lot of people complaining about a possible tether charge. I don't understand the problem. You have unlimited data for your phone, not your computer. If you go to an all you can eat buffet YOU can eat all you want from your plate. Does that Mean 3 other people can eat for free off of your plate because it's unlimited?
While I agree that MMS may not be needed, nor do we "need" many other things the iPhone currently offers. You sound like someone who praises Steve Jobs as if he knows everything, and everything he does is good. I think we should have MMS because I paid $600 for something that doesn't do what a $20 phone can do. It might not be a necessity but it is something nice to have. And by saying apple created new standards by not including MMS is ridiculous. To create new standards, the old ones have to be improved upon. Not including MMS and making it so that we have to send our pictures via email and look at MMS's sent to us on a website sounds a heck of a lot easier than just simply having the picture appear in the text conversation and being able to send one back, doesn't it?
Your right, I guess I don't need to look at the thousands of things that use flash. And maybe I don't need to send or receive MMS's, but I want to, and I should expect it if products 1/30th of the price can provide those features. I'm sorry if my post comes out as blunt; but I am sick and tired of people praising and worshiping Steve Jobs for providing out of date hardware at a grossly overpriced cost that can't do things products that came out years ago for much cheaper can do only to adopt it soon after and rape consumers.
... 1MB of SMS = 6500 texts = reason to get the unlimited messaging plan for $20, isn't it? Lots cheaper and renders their calculations moot
In the same vein, the fact that 5GB/month would cost $25,600 on the ATT $5/MB plan, simply means that it's far cheaper to get the $30 per month data plan.
Sure, if you accept the premise that AT&T is charging a fair and reasonable price. I don't. It isn't even close. Come on now, you don't really think it costs AT&T and the other carriers 20 cents per SMS message, do you?![]()
While I agree that MMS may not be needed, nor do we "need" many other things the iPhone currently offers. You sound like someone who praises Steve Jobs as if he knows everything, and everything he does is good. I think we should have MMS because I paid $600 for something that doesn't do what a $20 phone can do. It might not be a necessity but it is something nice to have. And by saying apple created new standards by not including MMS is ridiculous. To create new standards, the old ones have to be improved upon. Not including MMS and making it so that we have to send our pictures via email and look at MMS's sent to us on a website sounds a heck of a lot easier than just simply having the picture appear in the text conversation and being able to send one back, doesn't it?
Your right, I guess I don't need to look at the thousands of things that use flash. And maybe I don't need to send or receive MMS's, but I want to, and I should expect it if products 1/30th of the price can provide those features. I'm sorry if my post comes out as blunt; but I am sick and tired of people praising and worshiping Steve Jobs for providing out of date hardware at a grossly overpriced cost that can't do things products that came out years ago for much cheaper can do only to adopt it soon after and rape consumers.
Steve Jobs et al disagree that MMS is needed.
Sure, if you accept the premise that AT&T is charging a fair and reasonable price. I don't. It isn't even close. Come on now, you don't really think it costs AT&T and the other carriers 20 cents per SMS message, do you?![]()
I'm talking about an iPhone Pro. you can keep your virtual keyboard. I just type faster on a real keyboard. Since when would the keyboard be flimsy and fall off? since this doesn't happen with most smart phones as they're put together well I'd expect an even better keyboard from Apple.
Especially since you can buy unlimited texting![]()