Another stupid attempt to destabilize Apple. Come one, after the dude who tried to spread some fud about iphone cracked with just some dust without the beginning of a proof or data to support its claims, now we get thrown at us some numbers that say quite nothing.
If we believe their numbers (and this is already something to do), 3.9% of iphone users reported a cracked screen within 4 months, as opposed to 2.1% of iPhone 3gs owners. Yes but 3.9% of what, thin air? I can only see that there is a higher number of people reporting that they broke their devise, because to start with, there is probably more people who bought iphones 4 than iphones 3GS during the same period of time. Higher number people buying a devise, higher possible chance that there are more of them breaking it. Higher iphones 4 out there, higher chance that more of them are being dropped. What is surprising here? Nothing is clearly showing that the iphone 4 is more prone to damage.
And I doubt that 20,000 iphones 4 is a large enough sample to be considered trustable as the iphone 4 sold by millions in the same period of time. Also considering the data from a warranty contracts is biased by definitions since people with an insurance will care less for their devise than someone else without one. They will naturally be more prone to drop their devise since they will be less careful knowing that they got an insurance for any damage. So, their numbers are just basically showing us that people with insurance break more phones than people without one. What a scoop.....
Then they claim,
"While our data doesn't identify which broken screens resulted from dirt trapped behind a slide case, at least a quarter of the broken glass claims involved the back screen. With 82% more cracked screens reported, the evidence suggests that the iPhone 4 is more vulnerable to physical damage than its predecessor."
Translation: We know that people are mostly dropping them, but we want to make a story of that and can't help ourself but to throw BS.