Why would you buy a phone that has Glass all around the outside hardware? You are either a tech freak, a child, rich enough to not care, or just plain stupid.
but those had a fob and were tied to a vest because people didn't want to drop/break them![]()
Despite its glass shields on front and back, the iPhone 4 is still proving to be resistant to breakage with less than 5% of owners reporting damages to SquareTrade, a consumer electronics warranty supplier selling iPhone insurance.
A recent study by SquareTrade shows only 4.7% of users filed claims for broken phones during their first four months of ownership. This means 95.3% of owners did not damage their phones.
While 4.7% is a 2.6% increase over damages reported by 3G owners during the same time period, industry sources expect this to decrease as people begin to understand how to handle the new phone designed from environmentally friendly and sustainable materials.
SquareTrade, has reported this as an astonishing 68 percent increase, possibly to make damages appear as if rocketing out of control. According to a Bravo Sierra analyst, "This reports shows only 4.7 people out of 100 have broken their phones by mishandling them. That is really not a very large increase over the 3G in terms of real numbers. While we like to assume the best, SquareTrade is possibly using the large numbers reporting technique to make damages appear to be much worse. This technique is routinely used by marketing people where self-serving spin—including lying with statistics—has become the accepted norm."
To be fair, most cracked screens go like this:
- HI, Are are you?
- Hello? Hello?
- God damn it, Steve!
Throws phone.
Otherwise, better than 3GS
Yes, the iPhone4 is more prone to damage than the 3GS.
Yes, the iPhone4 is FAR more fragile than it should be ... devices that are handled numerous daily in all conditions OF COURSE should have some tough/rugged features built in.
Glass??? Yes, it's a BAD idea, it's heavy and shatters when dropped.
Apple could have made the phone tougher and lighter with very little thought or engineering.
With the iPhone it's not so much form over function because it functions so very very well, it's an amazing phone and millions and millions of people aren't wrong.
It would of been nice though when making such an amazing phone that a little more thought or care would of went into having it withstand "real life daily activities" without the constant thought of 'oh I don't want to drop my phone' , 'be careful with my phone' ...
It's 2010 now, they could easily make the iPhone 4 beautiful and tough, so tough it could bounce off a floor ... but that wouldn't be good for sales now would it?
Glass beer bottles break more than plastic ones! :O
Really it shouldn't be surprising to anyone that glassy iPhone 4 breaks more than plasticy 3GS.
People keep saying this - I've given an answer for this, I guess I have to repeat myself. THE SCREEN HAS TO BE GLASS. Look at every other touchscreen phone. They pretty much all have glass screens, because plastic scratches too easily to be used for a touchscreen device. Yes, the back of the iPhone 4 is glass too, and that wasn't 100% necessary, but as I already said, it's easily replaced with 2 screws, and not exactly expensive - it really shouldn't be part of the discussion.
If the iPhone 4 was drop-proof, it wouldn't be a useful touch-screen device, at least, not for long.
This makes absolutely no sense.![]()
Despite its glass shields on front and back, the iPhone 4 is still proving to be resistant to breakage with less than 5% of owners reporting damages to SquareTrade, a consumer electronics warranty supplier selling iPhone insurance.
A recent study by SquareTrade shows only 4.7% of users filed claims for broken phones during their first four months of ownership. This means 95.3% of owners did not damage their phones.
While 4.7% is a 2.6% increase over damages reported by 3G owners during the same time period, industry sources expect this to decrease as people begin to understand how to handle the new phone designed from environmentally friendly and sustainable materials.
SquareTrade, has reported this as an astonishing 68 percent increase, possibly to make damages appear as if rocketing out of control. According to a Bravo Sierra analyst, "This reports shows only 4.7 people out of 100 have broken their phones by mishandling them. That is really not a very large increase over the 3G in terms of real numbers. While we like to assume the best, SquareTrade is possibly using the large numbers reporting technique to make damages appear to be much worse. This technique is routinely used by marketing people where self-serving spinincluding lying with statisticshas become the accepted norm."
Relax. I think we (most of us) would be referring to the glass on the back of the device.
I think the back glass SHOULD be part of the discussion as not every consumer wants to take apart their phone if the drop it.
I take things apart all of the time and that still does not mean I want to re[p]lace the glass on my phone if I drop it.
Also, increase from 2.8 to 4.7 percent of total phones means 68% increase in breakage ratio. Obvious indication of design flaw.
Make a phone with glass screens. It breaks easily.
Make the screen as hard as humanly possible to replace.
Who are all these imbeciles who drop their phones all the time? Take care of your technology people.
I keep my iPhone is one of these:
http://www.sfbags.com/products/iphone-cases/smartcase-iphone.php
(it fits all models). My original iPhone doesn't have a scratch on it after 2+ years.
I'm confident my iPhone 4 will stay well protected.
A recent study by SquareTrade shows only 4.7% of users filed claims for broken phones during their first four months of ownership. This means 95.3% of owners did not damage their phones."
For those who criticize people for dropping their phones, ya' know what? S h i t happens.