How is my point a fail?
My point is there are plenty of things that are extremely well made that are more fragile than cheaper lower quality products.
A good example is a dog clutch transmission like used in a race car compared to a syncromesh transmission like used in my subaru. The dog clutch racing transmission is SUBSTANTIALLY better made than my transmission, but if I tried to use the racing transmission I'd destroy it because it requires skill to use it without damaging it as it is more sensitive.
In general increased persistent and built quality will make something more fragile and sensitive to issues as the more precise something is, the lower it's tolerances are.
This is where even a mechanical timex is more durable than a rolex. because rolexs have substantially more complicated, elaborate and PRECISE parts. So you drop both watches, a gear moves a little bit in both, on the timex, the part is still within tolerance (less precise more tolerance) the rolex is outside of tollerance and jams, and what do you know, broken watch.
Oh, and so you know timex doesn't make a true mechanical watch this was all just for the sake of argument. Most cheaper analog watches you see in stores are actually digital watches that use a motor to turn the dials on the face. That's how they are able to run using batteries.
Regardless, your argument is the one that is a failure. Asking for a phone to be drop proof is like asking for a car that is crash proof. You can't get mad at an automaker if you crash your car and it get's messed up because... you still are the one who crashed the car.
