No it doesn't. 3G retained the same chassis as 1st gen iPhone. So did 3GS more or less. So according to that, the first 3 iPhones were the 1st generation. The only major chassis change came in iPhone 4.
Hold on a second. They named it because 4 was the 4th one, or 4 comes after 3 in 3GS? What if the network technology was called 5G, and the second iPhone was 5G, and third was 5GS, then would the 4th one be 6 or 4? Decide.
Which would not make any sense.
No it doesn't.
Look - the iPhone 4 can only be the iPhone 4 if the prior three were the iPhone 1, 2 and 3. Otherwise the iPhone 4 cannot be called the iPhone 4 in any universe where logic makes sense.
The above is utterly irrefutable logic. Whatever names they were sold under the generational sequence only makes sense this way. You cannot have a fourth generational device without 3 prior generations. QED.
If the iPhone 3GS is the third generation device (which for the above to work it has to be) then the iPhone 4S is the iPhone 5. There is no way that this cannot be true without the naming convention that we are seeing emerge falling apart.
So either calling the iPhone 4 the iPhone 4 was illogical or calling the iPhone 4S the iPhone 4S is illogical. The two cannot both be correct. Thus the naming convention does not make sense.
Wait what ? What happened to the 3rd generation of phones then ?
iPhone
iPhone 3G/3GS
iPhone 4/4S
That's only 3 generations by your own count. How can the iPhone 4/4S be the "4th generation" and be sensical ? Was the original iPhone so great it spanned 2 generations on its own ?
Anyway, still getting the phone.
No, they are both logical in their own because there never was a naming convention.
For your argument to be true, Apple either had to name each of their Phones according to generation, in which case naming this one 4S would be breaking the tradition, or Apple had to name each of their phones according to some fixed characteristic, which is not equal to generation, in which case naming the 4th one iPhone 4 would be breaking the tradition.
But since Apple did neither, they never created a tradition/convention for naming. As long as each name made sense on its own, it worked.
Actually, the chassis of the first 3 phones is almost identical, so they all had to be 1st gen with that "logic"
Yous are worse than women - picky picky picky.
I'll simplify it for those who can't seem to read nor care to understand.
The first three iPhones
- iPhone (known as 2G)
- iPhone 3G
- iPhone 3GS
These were named due to their network capabilities (minus the 3GS which was named clearly to show it was a superior model of the 3G).
I clearly said these models
were not named due to which generation of iPhone they are and do not follow any style of naming convention.
The 4th ever iPhone so the name makes sense since when released 4G network capabilities was not mainstream it did not warrant any other name other than that reason.
It had a new chassis compared to the older iPhones.
Technically the 5th iPhone ever released but is clearly a superior model of iPhone 4 as it retains the looks and a lot components so they can keep the '4' and add an 'S' and you can thank the fact it uses a certain percentage of iPhone 4 components and looks almost identical.
Unless you guys do not understand what generation means - if you think of any other product...
i.e. the automobile - a car will be regarded as the same generation even if it receives a facelift.
i.e. games consoles - can be slimmed down and receive more reliable / better internal components, its still the same generation
So technically you could think of the iPhone 4 as the second generation iPhone if you want - no official word on which generation is which exists so its a pointless argument. The naming follows no perfect convention / numerical value but makes perfect sense to me why they would name the new model the 4S because it is identical to the 4.
Apple could call the next iPhone the 1080HD if they wanted - everyone would just reference it to being HD - it doesnt mean they missed the other 1079 of them.
Mountain of a molehill.