If Samsung doesn't report numbers, how are these estimates made?
Who told you that?
If Samsung doesn't report numbers, how are these estimates made?
Since they still sell the 4S - they have two sized phones now, don't they. That day has "come"
How many smartphones does Samsung cutrently sell..? A lot VS. 3 (4,4s,5) that apple is currently selling. How can there possibly be a comparison here?
Between unit sales and profit is revenue. If company A sells 5 phones for $100 each, and company B sells 1 phone for $500, the revenue is the same. According to Apple's numbers yesterday, their revenue growth in the smartphone market was 58%, while the overall market revenue grew by 30something% only.
Apple keeps all the fandroids happy by selling only expensive phones, while millions and millions buy the cheapest possible Android phone to make phone calls, never using them as a smartphone. It is quite obvious when you look at the overall phone unit sales that Apple has enormous growth. There is a switch from people buying $100 smart phones instead of $100 feature phones, which gives the fandroids something to cheer, but doesn't affect Apple at all.
You didn't respond to the part talking about more choices lead to more marketshare. I take it, that you are admitting, that you were wrong then.![]()
You know what a mean: offering new models in screen sizes comparable to the HTC One X, GSIII, etc.
You didn't respond to the part talking about more choices lead to more marketshare. I take it, that you are admitting, that you were wrong then.![]()
No biggie, though![]()
Don't manipulate the facts. It is not cheaper in most instances.So how does "cheap" factor in when the iPhone is as cheap or cheaper in most instances.
I keep seeing people post about "cheap phones" in reference to Samsung, but I can't see where that is coming from. The popular phones by Samsung cost the same or considerably more than an iPhone. The iPhone 4s is free with a two years contract, and the iPhone 5 is typically $199 (us)... the same as most new Samsung smartphones. Some, such as the Galaxy Note II are considerable more expensive than iPhone. So how does "cheap" factor in when the iPhone is as cheap or cheaper in most instances.
It's more like more price points lead to more market share. Not everyone can afford an iPhone or are willing to spend a lot for a phone.
Who told you that?
It's called spin. Some here cannot fathom how another company may make good products. I seems their personal self worth is tied to their consumer electronics choice.
Well I concede that it matters (to a degree). Although I would argue that for many - the operating system/ecosystem is the bigger deciding factor for a lot.
I think a lot of people go into a store wanting an iPhone. They don't come out with anything but an iPhone. I think some people go in not knowing what they want and will get what appeals to them. And of course, other people go in wanting Android - and then have a varied selection.
I honestly believe that iPhone is more ubiquitous (IE - when when people want an MP3 player - they, most often want an iPod simply because it's the "standard" of MP3 players.)
So when I make that comment about walking into the store - I do believe a lot of the time it's more about iPhone or not iPhone vs specs. Naturally - this is my .02.
Keep cheering for the Korean appliance manufacturer, fools.
Mainstream Android user does not care about "the latest release of the OS". They don't even know the difference. Only geeks care.
Also, Android OS is initially more mature and 2-3 years ahead of iOS so Android upgrades are not as importnat as iOS upgrades.
For instance Android had such important features - Copy/Paste, multitasking, resolution independent UI, notifications, voice command, folders - since version 1.0.
iOS is on the other hand always half-baked. Apple made big deal of these OS features releasing some of them as late as iOS6.
My 2-1/2 year old IP4 with iOS6 has a hell of a lot more of the current features than ANY 1 year or older 2.X Android.
Shipments don't mean Sales...big difference. Key words from the report...
With Samsung still declining to release official sales number, IDC estimated the company's smartphone shipments at 56.3 million during the quarter,
When companies refuse to report sales numbers but instead report 'shipments'...all that means is that they shipped a bunch of phones to retailers...doesn't mean the retailers SOLD them and the retailers can return unsold units.
Perfect example was the HP Touchpad that shipped 1+ million...in truth, they sold something like 30K before the firesale took place.
----------
Samsung makes tons of 'cheap' phones...just check out the pay as you go section.
IPhone selling very bad in Korea. Oriental know how to fighting by hitting you in pocket book. Look at Japan and China. Chinese fight by not buying Japeses products. Doing much damage to Japan economy. This only small sample but if all China not buy they will taking long time recover. Apple should carefully decide better to negotiate then to suing.
You are cherry-picking "tests". In any case, when Android phone "plastic cover go flying off", typically the phone does not crack. An iPhone 4 would crack most of the time.
Clearly they are doing something right.
Since they still sell the 4S - they have two sized phones now, don't they. That day has "come"
Do you have a point? Are you really suggesting that people should only post in Mac threads because they don't have or like the iPhone?
Makes me wonder if you're actually a developer.
Whilst I can't speak for iOS development, the way on Android is that you develop for the lowest API version that supports all the features your app needs, which gives you the broadest level of compatibility. There's no need to target Jelly Bean if you don't use any Jelly Bean features. You can target say Gingerbread and have your app run on anything.
Don't manipulate the facts. It is not cheaper in most instances.
Just checked Amazon (UK):
Samsung Galaxy SIII - 379.00 GBP
iPhone 4S - 450.00 GBP.
And I'm not even talking about iPhone 5.
I have to agree with most of the other posts. Apple makes a really good looking product but iOS is dated. It has looked the same since day one and is just dated!
I agree that iOS doesn't do everything I need it to do!
Main stream users do care when they try to download an app but can't because their OS version is too old. I've had many friends with brand new Android phones that couldn't play Angry Birds or some other app. They cared and were upset that they couldn't upgrade their phones.
iOS might not have had all features from version 1, but the OS was never considered half-baked. It always run smoothly and ran well.
But if you want to talk about half-baked / half-assed features...
Android's copy and paste originally only worked in editable text fields.
Touch input only worked in parts of the OS and multi-touch didn't come until later.
Android 3.x was a complete dud, it only ever appeared on a handful of devices that no one used.
The entire user interface was scrapped and redone after the iPhone was introduced. Before becoming an iPhone knock-off, it was a Blackberry knock-off.
And... The first product that shipped with Android did so a year and a half after the iPhone.
But yeah, iOS is years behind because Android had a notification manager first. Whatever.
If you're going to brag about who had what first... Apple had a device on the market running their OS first, so Google pretty much had to catch up to Apple from the very beginning and it took them 18 months to do so with a half-assed attempt at best. Yeah, that T-Mobile G1 set the world on fire! It took another 18 months before Android based devices started selling in any real numbers. And it only took off because Microsoft and Nokia were lumbering dinosaurs that moved too damned slow to update their operating systems.
Main stream users do care when they try to download an app but can't because their OS version is too old. I've had many friends with brand new Android phones that couldn't play Angry Birds or some other app. They cared and were upset that they couldn't upgrade their phones.
iOS might not have had all features from version 1, but the OS was never considered half-baked. It always run smoothly and ran well.
But if you want to talk about half-baked / half-assed features...
Android's copy and paste originally only worked in editable text fields.
Touch input only worked in parts of the OS and multi-touch didn't come until later.
Android 3.x was a complete dud, it only ever appeared on a handful of devices that no one used.
The entire user interface was scrapped and redone after the iPhone was introduced. Before becoming an iPhone knock-off, it was a Blackberry knock-off.
And... The first product that shipped with Android did so a year and a half after the iPhone.
But yeah, iOS is years behind because Android had a notification manager first. Whatever.
If you're going to brag about who had what first... Apple had a device on the market running their OS first, so Google pretty much had to catch up to Apple from the very beginning and it took them 18 months to do so with a half-assed attempt at best. Yeah, that T-Mobile G1 set the world on fire! It took another 18 months before Android based devices started selling in any real numbers. And it only took off because Microsoft and Nokia were lumbering dinosaurs that moved too damned slow to update their operating systems.