If I understand you correctly, you're saying that Apple could decide to go with a lower resolution on a bigger screen (308 ppi on a 3.7" screen)? Yes, that's possible, but it seems like a step backwards. Maybe that's what they'll do, but as I said before, I doubt it.
As for a 4" screen, you can't make it 1141 pixels across the diagonal and still have 300 ppi: 1141 pixels / 4.0" = 285.25 ppi. So a 4" screen with the same number of pixels would drop the display below the "magical" 300 ppi. No way Apple does that.
IMO the iphone 4 is still the best and from what I see the best selling smartphone on the market. I dont really see the need for a significant upgrade.
This is MacRumors... But I would like to see this and other sites start tracking or keeping a score card on the analysts, speculators, insiders.
Apple is doing an amazing job this year at keep the lid on the iphone 5 unlike it's iphone 4 problems! No one has any idea what is going on with all the point counter-point "analysts"
Well played Mr. Jobs! Well played!![]()
This is MacRumors -- they've been keeping score cards on analysts since 2000...
IOS has resolution independence (scroll down a little on that page). This means if Apple releases a phone with the same resolution but bigger screen the whole interface increases at the scale of the display increase. A 3.7" iPhone would be about 1.06 (rounded up) times larger. With resolution independence, the whole interface would be multiplied by 1.06. A box on a iPhone 4 of 1" by 1" would now appear as a box of 1.06" by 1.06" on a larger iPhone 5. Retina display only needs 300 PPI and a 3.7" phone would have about 311 PPI, which is still "retina". A 4" screen would have a PPI of 288, so a 4" screen would be unlikely.
IMO the iphone 4 is still the best and from what I see the best selling smartphone on the market. I dont really see the need for a significant upgrade.
960^2 + 640^2 = sqrt (x)
x = 1153.77, not 1141! You must have skipped Algebra lessons on the Pythagorean Theorem. (LOL, I kid, I kid!)
3.7 is at 311.83.
4" would be 288.44 dpi btw.
Now that looks better!
Thanks you Macrumors for you using this Mockup and not the totaly ugly one.
Wonder what the real one will look like, though.
I don't know why anyone is doubting this is going to be a big upgrade.
Firstly after attena-gate, I highly doubt they will keep that design aspect of the phone the same.
Secondly, this refresh is coming months later than usual for previous phones, so they have had longer to develop it.
And finally, the iphone 4 is starting to get quite behind the competition hardware wise, and if apple's refreshes are going to only be 12-18 months then when they launch a new phone it has to be quite ahead of the competition so that throughout the cycle it can still stay near the top.
I'm still pretty happy with my iPhone 4, but Apple is a company that likes to move forward. They like to lead the pack. By the same token, they also are not known to follow trends "just because".
IOS has resolution independence (scroll down a little on that page). This means if Apple releases a phone with the same resolution but bigger screen the whole interface increases at the scale of the display increase. A 3.7" iPhone would be about 1.06 (rounded up) times larger. With resolution independence, the whole interface would be multiplied by 1.06. A box on a iPhone 4 of 1" by 1" would now appear as a box of 1.06" by 1.06" on a larger iPhone 5. Retina display only needs 300 PPI and a 3.7" phone would have about 311 PPI, which is still "retina". A 4" screen would have a PPI of 288, so a 4" screen would be unlikely.
i agree.
"Just because" implies arbitrariness. I don't think Apple does anything without good reason. It may not always be the best reason, but it's a reason to them that makes sense. Some thought that Apple was stupid for manufacturing Macs without floppy drives. That wasn't "just because"; it was because they envisioned thumb drives replacing floppies. They were ahead of the curve, and helped make it a reality. Same with no Flash in iPhones and iPads. Some think this was arbitrariness, or simple spite towards Adobe, but Apple doesn't take risks with its user base just to make a point. They're changing the game again and accelerating the trend towards HTML5. And it's working.
Anyone ever thought that it took extra time to make the 5 simply because all of the negative feedback on the 4, thus forcing them to get a new design "last minute".... New processor, new camera, slightly different form... Done
Agreed. That is what I meant. Apple won't do something "just because" someone else is doing it. They tend to be a leader more than a follower.
Why? What will LTE allow you to do that you *need* that that 3G won't?
Spending $500+ dollars on a phone that does not include the latest technology. Its hard to justify spending $500 dollars on something that does not include the latest and greatest tech, especially if the only change is form factor based.
I totally agree on this. But what should we expect.
I doubt LTE will be there due to the compromises the current tech needs, plus it is irrelevant to so many customers throughout the world as 4G network coverage is still in its infancy.
There may be a bigger screen, but hopefully it doesn't mean a bigger device. All those 4"+ Androids look huge.
If there is a redesign as I expect, I'm sure there will be a totally revised antenna functionality.
Hopefully it will also be more comfortable to hold than the current design. I have a bumper on my iPhone 4 mainly because it is uncomfortable to hold without it. That the current design is also too fragile with the exposed glass is another reason for the bumper.
Apart from that, a speed bump plus all the new iOS5 functions.
Apple seems perfectly content with not having the best spec'ed hardware, or the limited feature set, etc.
What they excel in is a near-flawless marriage of hardware and software, and a feature-set included that will not degrade the user experience at the end of the day. Some examples include Flash integration (how many mobile users are thrilled with the performance of Flash?) and true multi-tasking (which Apple recognized could not have been implemented without a negative impact on battery life and performance - both of which are very real, as I can tell you as a jailbroken iPhone user with true multi-tasking). While other companies seem to focus their energy on putting a dual-core processor in, Apple focuses on how they can further enhance the user experience at the end of the day. This is why I will buy an Apple product over a better-spec'ed product.
Isn't that more of a carrier issue? Most places in the US don't get 4G/LTE , in AT&Ts case your lucky if you can even get 3G.