This^^
Well I think I'm going gsm version and hope it'd take a Verizon sim
it will take a verizon sim, but you might only have VoLTE (no 3G). Unlikely, but possible. Apple has done it before.
This^^
Well I think I'm going gsm version and hope it'd take a Verizon sim
it will take a verizon sim, but you might only have VoLTE (no 3G). Unlikely, but possible. Apple has done it before.
And you all are certain that the T-Mobile phone is the AT&T one without any restrictions?
Well, I couldn't get one on AT&T, so I got the T-Mobile version. I really hope I didn't screw myself.
This page is confirming what has been stated the last few days, that the T-Mobile 6s is the same as the Verizon and Sprint model, and the AT&T model is on it's own: http://www.apple.com/iphone/LTE/
Apple finally updated its LTE page with the 6s/plus -- http://www.apple.com/iphone/LTE/
This is rather curious. It is listing the models as:
iPhone 6s
Model A1633
iPhone 6s Plus
Model A1634
This is obviously for use with AT&T, but then it lists:
iPhone 6sWhat on earth is model A1638? This is the first anyone, including Google, has ever seen this. Does anyone know where this model number came from?
Model A1638 (GSM)
Model A1638 (CDMA)
iPhone 6s Plus
Model A1687 (GSM)
Model A1687 (CDMA)
The iP6s tech spec page still lists the models as A1633/34 and A1688/87. Why is model A1688 not listed on Apple's LTE page? Was model A1688 renamed to A1638 for some reason? Can anyone help make sense of these discrepancies?
This is rather curious. It is listing the models as:
iPhone 6s
Model A1633
iPhone 6s Plus
Model A1634
This is obviously for use with AT&T, but then it lists:
iPhone 6sWhat on earth is model A1638? This is the first anyone, including Google, has ever seen this. Does anyone know where this model number came from?
Model A1638 (GSM)
Model A1638 (CDMA)
iPhone 6s Plus
Model A1687 (GSM)
Model A1687 (CDMA)
The iP6s tech spec page still lists the models as A1633/34 and A1688/87. Why is model A1688 not listed on Apple's LTE page? Was model A1688 renamed to A1638 for some reason? Can anyone help make sense of these discrepancies?
has to be a misprint/typo id say...looks like china has thier own models as well
I am inclined to agree. It seems someone at Apple has fat fingers and meant to type A1688. That would fit our current understanding so far of the model numbers.has to be a misprint/typo id say...
This is likely the case. The same GSM/CDMA labeling was used for the iPhone 6, but in reality they all had CDMA enabled.The question is, what are the actual hardware and functional differences between these models? Is it possible the (GSM)/(CDMA) labeling is a misnomer, done for the purpose of carrier distinction, and actually both functionally the same? That would fit the iP6s tech specs and FCC docs. Any thoughts on this?
This is likely the case. The same GSM/CDMA labeling was used for the iPhone 6, but in reality they all had CDMA enabled.
I am inclined to agree. It seems someone at Apple has fat fingers and meant to type A1688. That would fit our current understanding so far of the model numbers.
So now it seems that there are actually ten different models of the iP6s (Plus):
Edit: This is likely just a labeling difference, with "GSM" and "CDMA" versions of the same model number being the exact same device.The question is, what are the actual hardware and functional differences between these models? Is it possible the (GSM)/(CDMA) labeling is a misnomer, done for the purpose of carrier distinction, and are actually both functionally the same? That would fit the iP6s tech specs and FCC docs. Any thoughts on this?
So if we simplify the models down to what they likely are and exclude China:
Then, as you mentioned, the only remaining question is if A1633/34 is CDMA capable or not.
- AT&T uses A1633/34
- Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile use A1687/88
What do you think? Am I missing anything?
- If A1633/34 is CDMA capable, then the AT&T phone is the "best" phone.
- If A1633/34 is not CDMA capable, then there is a trade-off between choosing A1687/88 with CDMA and no band 30, and choosing A1633/34 with band 30 but no CDMA.
Given that the FCC pressured the carriers to unlock phones and offer interoperability, it would be very unusual for Apple not to actually provide CDMA capabilities on the AT&T version regardless of what is disclosed on the tech specs on Apple's website.So if we simplify the models down to what they likely are and exclude China:
Then, as you mentioned, the only remaining question is if A1633/34 is CDMA capable or not.
- AT&T uses A1633/34
- Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile use A1687/88
What do you think? Am I missing anything?
- If A1633/34 is CDMA capable, then the AT&T phone is the "best" phone.
- If A1633/34 is not CDMA capable, then there is a trade-off between choosing A1687/88 with CDMA and no band 30, and choosing A1633/34 with band 30 but no CDMA.
As I posted the FCC specs earlier, all iPhones are CDMA capable. The issue is still whitelisting. Given only AT&T uses LTE Band 30 I would say it's only the best model if you ever plan to go on Death Star.
...and if you ask another one, you will get a different answer.So the Apple Store rep told me that all phones, including AT&T, have both GSM and CDMA.