I'm just waiting to see what term is chosen if the iPhone ever has an issue pertaining to water.
Sorry your clever and subtle joke bounced off a few. But I got I nice chuckle out of it.
I'm just waiting to see what term is chosen if the iPhone ever has an issue pertaining to water.
If I lived close to this guy we would be best buds a drink brewskies together
Yet UnboxTherapy is still claiming it was/is a huge issue. Because...hey, their video was the 4th most watched on YouTube last year.Here we go again.
My two cents: Bendgate was a non issue and overblown and making a stronger phone doesn't add any credibility to the bendgate conspiracy theorist
Dihydrogenmonoxidegate. I'd hate to see H2O2 become Hydrogenperoxidegate.Dihydrogenoxigate?
Sorry, but why the hell would you put a phone in your back pocket? I wouldn't even do that with the strongest phone on the world. In fact, I typically avoid people doing this. xDFor all you doubters out there:
My 6+ bent within the first week or two of ownership. That was just from being in my back pocket sitting in my office chair or car seat. Functioned while bent for about 8 months before the touch-sensitivity of the screen started getting flaky.
Went to the Apple store, and I actually had to pay them for a new phone, even with AppleCare, for what was clearly a design flaw.![]()
Now, I did not bother with the video, but looking at the data there is something I don't understand: My rule of thumb for EDX (which they seemed to have used for elemental analysis) is that it probes up to 1 micometer into the sample, give or take a few % depending on beam voltage. The effect of surface iron from machining on the results is consistent with that. But if the top 10 micrometers of the sample were anodic oxide, they did not really probe the bulk of the alloy. Depending on the parameters used during anodisation it would be rather fortuitous if the bulk alloy composition and the anodic oxide composition matched. Also, they seemed to conviniently leave the oxygen peak out from their analysis.
How much can we trust this data? Whatever is presented conveniently matches the 7000 series, but is that because this outcome was expected anyways?
If only 9 iPhone 6 and 6 Pluses ever bent I don't see why they are spending so much time and money reengineering the case.
I am guessing this doesn't matter - someone will bend the 6s and post it in YouTube....Impressive how they took it from 30 Pounds of pressure to 80 Pounds before bending. That's a huge difference.
If they tested the middle they would not have had the iron issue...Wouldn't they just have tested the back of the case? Or perhaps test the middle after cutting it in half? (Note: I didn't watch video because that guy is annoying.)
Ah, that is right.If they tested the middle they would not have had the iron issue...
To be fair, there's actually nothing wrong with putting an iPhone in your back pocket. I've done it before plenty of times when my trusty front left pocket has had other plans.Sorry, but why the hell would you put a phone in your back pocket? I wouldn't even do that with the strongest phone on the world. In fact, I typically avoid people doing this. xD
No, a phone belongs in your front pocket. Plain as simple. Doesn't mean it won't bend then, but if you put it in your back pocket you actually just ask for it to happen. Don't do it again, not even with a the iPhone 6s if its really as strong as how this video has shown.
---
If Apple really has made the iPhone 6s this strong, that would be really really remarkable. It's a difference between day and night. Haven't had bend issues with my iPhone 6, but that doesn't mean I don't welcome this change. Especially because the phone itself would just be way more durable. And that adds up to the rest of what iPhone makes so great to me. For many potential iPhone buyers it will make a lot of sense as well.
What? So did you have your Adblock OFF? You like ads? Ads sux, man.This guy again... wait.. Let me turn on AdBlock first before playing YouTube...