There's an interesting review of the iPhone 7 on one of the main UK newspaper's web site that pretty much concludes that all the iPhone 7 benefits are destroyed by bad battery life...
The reviewer claims that he gets less battery life from his 7 than he did from his 6s when new.
Frankly I'm skeptical because his experiences are so at odds with Apple's claims and there is even some solid technical information this time around about why Apple's claims of improving the battery life vs the previous generation seem credible (e.g. adding the 2 low power cores to the A10 Fusion SoC and the slightly bigger battery in the 7 vs the 6s rather than battery capacity reductions that we've sometimes seen between past generations).
I wonder if the reviewer had a defective review unit. Given how proactive and protective they are I would be surprised if Apple PR doesn't contact him to see what happened. It will be very interesting to revisit the review page in a few weeks time to see if it is updated in any way in case there did turn out to be a fault on his phone. Surely Apple PR aren't going to let this stay out there if it is down to a faulty unit?
Full review is here: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/23/iphone-7-review-poor-battery-life
Read that yesterday and found it thoroughly perplexing. I'm in the opposite position, getting to the end of the day and being surprised by just how much battery is left.
His expectations, IMHO, are way off. "If I use my phone all day then it doesn't last all day" is silly