Looks good to me. I'll see how it fares with real world use though
You mean that wasn't real enough world use?
Looks good to me. I'll see how it fares with real world use though
Also iOS will support native raw functionality at some point in the future.
Also iOS will support native raw functionality at some point in the future.
What model exactly do you carry around?
Maybe another app in the App Store?The APIs exist in iOS 10, but it sounds as if Apple is not going to implement RAW in the stock camera app, from my understanding of the recent keynote.
Maybe another app in the App Store?
I'm not up to date in iphone / iOS technology : can iphone shoot raw ?
The pictures are pretty great, but as others have said, this isn't low light.![]()
If you have a DLSR and take many photos with it, it's really hard to accept the quality that a phone's camera produces, even if the quality gets "better and better." Because if you happen to take a great shot with a phone's camera, you realized you could've taken a better shot with a DSLR.
Phil said on-stage not to abandon DSLR's and that they're not a direct replacement.
Start by trying to carry just one DSLR and one lens... stop with the ********. Or you are not an artist.
It's not hard to carry a DSLR with you.
None of these photos are in "low light condition". High contrast + good dynamic (+ presumably HDR) in order to slightly bring out shadows, OK, but not low light. I'd like to see how the sensor and phone behaves in low light with low contrast, thus maxing out ISO.
I'm not up to date in iphone / iOS technology : can iphone shoot raw ? if so, what the bitdepth of the raw info ? can an app like snapseed (if google ported it to iOS) do wonders?
That might a problem endemic to all cell phone cameras.Low light photos on the iPhone are fine if they are stills. But once someone makes any sudden, slight movement, they turn to crap.
You may not care, but for the vast majority the camera they always have with them counts. And for many that is the iPhone.Let's be honest, you don't even need a DSLR to get pictures that looks miles better than any smartphone can produce, ever. Cameras like Sony RX-100 III/IV, Ricoh GR II, or Fuji X70 all are in super compact package and doing great job in all lightining conditions. When i bought one (x70), i don't even care about camera upgrade in any smartphone![]()
So you say that you've been a professional photographer for 30 years in NYC and you make a comment like that? Obviously you are a poser or a troll. Of course i don't carry that much gear with me on any given assignment. That's the amount of gear that I have in my arsenal.
But that's ok, you obviously wouldn't even understand.
On-stage, he did mention that it would be the best camera some people ever had. Raising my arm up, that is me.
I say he's a troll. Has no idea about photography. Usual anger management issues give it away.
Its like being back at the "tablets will never replace PCs" crossroads again. PC sales tanked whilst phone and tablets sales went up. DSLR camera sales went down as phones sales went up.
Its clear to see what's occurring here. There will always be PCs, there will always be DSLRs, just not as many of each.
Don't get me wrong, these look stunning but I think the dual-camera isn't that much better than the camera in the 7. It can only do optical zoom at 2x and software zoom at 10x (the 7 can do software zoom at 5x). And the bokeh effect isn't even available yet. This year Phil said, probably means next year. He didn't even give us a set month like they did with the AirPods for example.