If they are using series 7 aluminum, as the leaks suggest, this new model will be more than twice the strength of the 6/6+. If you buy into the "Bendgate" BS, this is significant.
It's going to be SO THIN that you can't plug lightening port (or usb c) into the iPhone port it would be smaller than the wire.
And let me guess... 16GB storage on the base device. Very forward thinking Apple...
I'd be surprised if the 6s and 6s+ won't be able to do the same type of charging the watch does.IPhone 7/+ will be wireless charging only. You heard it here first.
I'd be surprised if the 6s and 6s+ won't be able to do the same type of charging the watch does.
OH i see...they couldn't get the plug to fit..and they have 7s plus for wireless.IPhone 7/+ will be wireless charging only. You heard it here first.
IPhone 7/+ will be wireless charging only. You heard it here first.
Form over Function.
I agree with you, slimming these things over and over is getting counter productive. Although the protruding camera can be seen as function over form, which is just as bad
They could please both users AND Jony Ive's sadistic quest for thinner devices by having an iPhone 'air' and an iPhone 'pro'
We are not "camping". More like working. Yes, we are near chargers but we don't have opportunities to constantly get it back up to 100%. Making it 10% bigger to get us near 18-20 hours battery life should be the goal in the near term. Batteries of 1-2 days better be 2 years out.I would like thinner and smaller. I don't care about battery, it never runs out on me, i'm always near chargers at home, in the office, in the car, even walking around its easy enough to have a backup battery hidden in your bag which can charge your phone tens of times. Not sure why everyone has so many issues with battery unless they're all camping with no chance of reaching a charge for two days at a time...
It makes perfect sense if you think of it from the standpoint that Apple will make an extra $100 from everyone who goes with the next model up... which is probably most of it's fan base rather than the cheapskates who are only willing to buy the base model.
As a business model it's VERY smart, lower tier base model makes 64gb model seem like a bargain.
As a consumer it sucks cause we're not getting a "great deal" but, "wah"... if you can't afford to play in Apple's yard go play in Google or Microsoft's.
Apple, just do this.
• iPhone Mini - 4 inch
• iPhone Air - 4.7 inch
• iPhone Pro - 5.5 inch
Quad Core A9, 2 GB of Ram, Wireless Charging, Adaptive fast charge, 1080p resolution, 12MP camera. Put this in all 3 so there aren't differences. Make the phones thick enough to accommodate larger batteries (and maybe the cameras flush) so the devices can last at least as much as the leading competitors. kthxbye
(For those of you eagerly waiting to say "get an android", no. I don't want a POS android device, I want iOS.)
"ONLY"? Then you're wrong, for one Wireless charging is slower for another, believe it or not people still sync their iPhones. I sync mine every day still to update my playlists also back up my playlists and apps to iTunes.
They might have wireless charging though... but I think until they have a significantly "Apple" form of wireless charging (maybe one that includes high speed data transfer as well) they might go "bag of hurt" with it. I mean the inductive charging standards have been around longer than NFC at this point and have only been adopted by more than a handful of phones on the market.
Ahhh - another day, another report from KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.
Where's the innovation in that?How about keep it the same size as the 6/6S but increase the battery size instead![]()
You can do all of that wirelessly, your example is irrelevant because you literally have an option that works exactly the same.
It's a very smart strategy because you force people into the "not ****" product tier. Them restricting it to only 16gb is a slap in the face to the customer, not everyone is a "cheapskate" because they buy the lowest version. How can you say something so incredibly stupid like that and have self respect? Their cheap because they don't want Apple to downright screw them over?
I cannot visibly discern the pixels on my 6 + without using a loupe. I'm don't know what double the resolution do for the display....