Drink the coolaide. If they wanted to they could manufacture enough so that everyone who wants one could have it within the first month. It isn't like they don't know what the demand for their products are.
And people say this every year, that Apple hold off on stock to artificially inflate demand. It's ridiculous. The truth is much simpler; they're very desirable phones and Apple can't make them quick enough.
Wireless charging for all makes me happy. I'm not going to buy a $1k starting price iPhone no matter how cool it is, so the 7s will be just fine for me.
That logic just completely baffles me. While the the manufacturers very well might not be able to crank them out quick enough, if Apple really wanted to solve this problem, they could. Supplies have been "constrained" for 10 years now.
BS. If it happens 1 year? Forgivable. Happens for 2 years straight? Questionable. For ~6+ years straight, nothing but intentional.
I also wanted to point out that I keep seeing these mockups showing the home button as a Siri icon, but I doubt Apple would do that. Users would see that and think "If I press that, it's going to make a loud beep and Siri will start talking." They will probably go back to using theroundrectsquircle that they used on the home button from 2007-2012.
"Edition" is such a stupid name for product in the way Apple use it. iPhone Edition, Apple Watch Edition, etc. Makes more sense if named iPhone Pro Edition, iPhone Anniversary Edition or Apple Watch Ceramic Edition. Just using product name and "Edition" just doesn't work.
Apple does this build hype every year. Make a few to make you want it more.
Useless banter. This early in the game you can make up any rumor you want. No one knows what will happen this far out.
It's gonna sell like hot cakes. The rumored 7s will also sell like hot cakes.
IMO it's the complete waste of space by having a virtual home button all alone at the bottom of the phone. People need to understand that we can potentially have apps flanking either side of the new home button as some mockups have highlighted. (No shame in removing those top and bottom bezels. Cut the cord, people.)That concept looks weird. Maybe it's just the app icons.
I really don't think many here have the tiniest inkling about the impossibility of this expectation. All the people saying Apple can solve this just seem to offer criticisms rather than actual solutions. I guess that's why Tim's the CEO.
They'd be mad not to call it the 8, the obsession with that number in China would boost sales all by itself.
I forgot to mention the asymmetrical top and bottom bezels. Apple would never do that. If they can't get the speaker, camera and proximity sensor integrated into the top of the display, it will have a thin bezel—and the same thickness will be found at the bottom—whether or not it has a purpose beyond the aesthetic. It has to look balanced. I suppose they could do a rather pure black with OLED, but then why put that piece of display there in the first place if it's always black?It's dopey things like that which make me discount and ignore 99% of the nonsense that these people spew out. They may have mastered 3D modelling, but consistently seem to COMPLETELY miss the point about the "Apple way" and the inevitability, critical simplicity and entirely rational balance and utility behind the subtlety of the elements of Apple designs.
Most folk miss these points and will never see what's hidden in plain sight because there trying too hard to second guess what's coming next, instead of calmly reflecting, examining and rationalizing what has come BEFORE, looking at years and years of Apple products, buying old ones on eBay and playing with them... examining them IN THEIR HANDS for weeks or months in end. The majority of people miss the subtlety of the incredible extremes of fine detail and nuance that are right in front of them every single day, and that's why few people will EVER understand what truly profound design and function is, and why all these external "iPhone killer" products consistently fail to do so.
I agree the conspiracy rhetoric is slightly silly, but it has a hint of truth in it. Apple can't underestimate their sales every year. That's just not possible (a bit of hyperbole, yes). At some point someone, somewhere, somehow would question: How do we end up supply constrained every year?
How is it you figure Apple can't make phones quick enough? Mis-identifying the right mix of product? I get that. Simply not being able to make enough? Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Especially, every single year.