Wireless.
Wireless.
Wireless!
As soon as wireless charging for iPhone arrives, the only people plugging iPhones into a cable will be fringe cases. And Apple is not going to risk ditching the (perfectly fine for mobile) Lightning connector for a much-riskier USB-C interface.
I don't see any difference in capability difference between USB-C & Lightning) other than compatibility with other phone chargers.Lightning was good for its time but I do feel it has now run its course. Hard to believe we've had it for 5 years already.
It really feels like it needs a push to get the USB-C ball rolling. Roll on USB-C for all iDevices and Macs.
So then there will be some iPhone users who will have to use a USB C to Lightning to 3.5mm adaptor for their headphones?
Not sh**ing you. First one: Screen went yellow on one half while I was charging it and the next day it was unresponsive. Eventually going completely black before I could even get to a sprint store.
Second one: Worked fine for a couple weeks, then woke up one morning after I had left it on the charger all night and the battery indicated 43% left. Next day it didn't happen. Then it started happening regularly where it wouldn't charge fully. Almost every other night this happened.
I called sprint and told them and they paid off my lease and let me have whatever I want. I went with the iPhone and I will probably never look back. Ive never been impressed with Sammy. I had a Note 5 that was a piece of crap as well. My Note 7 ironically was the only Sammy I have owned that I loved and we all know how that ended.
My money is on USB C never coming to the iPhone or iPad and Apple will will continue to use the Lightning port for as long as they need to.
You do realise USB-C solves the exact issue you're citing?
lolwut? How would that have been courageous?
Ditching the headphone jack was courageous because they knew they would get hate from people for it but it was the right thing to do.
Apple would get barely any hate for switching to USB-C.
- Lightning is also a standard. And USB-C (for being a "standard") can cause a world of trouble.
- More pins benefits Apple mobile device customers, how?
- Cheaper doesn't mean anything when you're talking about a $700 phone
- 100w, for charging a phone?
Since when has ANY Apple hardware decision - when it comes to removing stuff benefit consumers? Again, starting all the way back with removing Floppy disks, to removing firewire, to removing the CD Rom drive, etc. every time Apple has made a decision to remove a key component it's been to benefit THEIR bottom line. The only people who continue to applaud this crap are Apple fanboys and tech geeks and it's always, ALWAYS done at the expense of the broader Apple consumers.
Sure they give us BS technical reasons behind the moves, but ultimately it always meant MORE money to Apple Customers who had to spend replacing stuff, buying more expensive macs, etc. It HAD zero to do with consumers.
Sure years later consumers may come around and it ultimately doesn't matter, but don't sit there and act like Apple makes Hardware decisions based solely on whether or not it 'benefits' consumers. Again, look at the Headphone Jack nonsense as a recent example of their arrogance.
Yeah, that is the other side that people screaming for usb-c are not considering.Ugh. I just got a lightening set of headphones.
Ah, the problem with Samsung copying everything and launching it 3 years in advanceAnd before Apple adopted the curved screen it was rubbish and a gimmick.. Now once apple has it, it will be the best thing since sliced bread.. You watch how people praise this when 12 months ago all they said it was such garbage.
James
I remember when OS X Lion came out, Apple was focused on a "Back to the Mac" campaign to bring several iOS features to the Mac.
I feel it's long overdue that a "Back to iOS" campaign happens, where Apple brings Mac features to iOS.
One more step towards convergence.
This doesn't need to be a jarring change. They can just put some features in there for power users. iOS could become so much better if Apple gave us some control.
Does QC stand for Quick Charge? If so, it's fine to plug into those.. it's not like they push too much power into a device. Devices *pull* the power they need. They simply will charge at whatever rate they *can* handle.
LOL iPhones. I haven't logged in here since my iphone 4. Happy af Galaxy S6 Edge Plus user signing off![]()
Who cares
A lot of Apple’s customers cares. For years, Apple’s ecosystem was so great because everything worked well together. As it stands now, you need dongles galore for all sorts of things. Just the other day, I was trying to sort out a way to charge my iPhone while driving and play audio through an aux cord at the same time. Took quite a bit of research to find a way to utilize my iPhone to do the things I want it to do. This is becoming a problem across the spectrum of Apple’s products and only seems to be getting worse.
That’s why we care.
i want to connect my new apple iphone 2016/17 to my new apple macbook pro 2016/17 without adapter.
i want to connect my sdcard adapter without an adapter-adapter to my apple eco system.
Sounds like you need to find a solution outside of Apple.A lot of Apple’s customers cares. For years, Apple’s ecosystem was so great because everything worked well together. As it stands now, you need dongles galore for all sorts of things. Just the other day, I was trying to sort out a way to charge my iPhone while driving and play audio through an aux cord at the same time. Took quite a bit of research to find a way to utilize my iPhone to do the things I want it to do. This is becoming a problem across the spectrum of Apple’s products and only seems to be getting worse.
That’s why we care.
USB-C and lightning are just means to an end and if Apple has a function that requires higher bandwidth than what lightning supplies, Apple will change to something else that allows them to provide that e.g. USB-CMy money is on USB C never coming to the iPhone or iPad and Apple will will continue to use the Lightning port for as long as they need to.
well that's one side of the story, the other side summary : there are other OLED manufacturers not just Samsung and Apple in the past sourced parts from various manufacturers so they can do the same this time.Supply and demand. Samsung is simply not able to produce enough OLED panels at the quality Apple demands. If Apple adopted OLED on all their phones they would sell far less than usual simply due to the fact that they wouldn't be able to produce enough panels to meet demand.
People keep bitching about all kinds of nonsense when it comes to Apple devices, how about people start spending some time in order to figure out how things actually work? Apple is selling more iPhone's than Samsung sells Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge. The quality of the AMOLED displays Samsung uses in their lower end models are not up to Apple standards in terms of brightness, uniformity and colour deviation.
In order for Apple to be able to utilise OLED in all their iPhone's, Samsung have to be able to produce over 100 million panels in no time and they are simply not up to the task. Especially when the need to produce for their own devices at the same time.
Not exactly 100% true, or cheap Chinese chargers wouldn't be causing so many issues with people's phones..
Lightning to USB C cable. Done.
What? Apple removed it to force everyone towards wireless, the exact opposite of "propriety connectors"!It was a cowardly way of further pushing people into propriety connectors
Lightning is bettercan't see why they would downgrade to a lesser more bulky standard... most apple users, have plenty of lightning cables lying around.
Apple dropping its own lightning port? Just a short period after switching to it? Dream on, this is never going to happen. Would like to see the faces of those people who just bought new lightning head phones after ditching the 3.5mm head phones..... they will be soooooo pissed.
Perhaps iPhone 8 will actually be called iPhone Pro and it gets USB-C just like the iPad Pro does at the March event.