Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
USB-C for what? I use the iPhone Lightning for different devices. This also includes my HD HDMI beamer. It is a mature and fast interface. I have no interest in connecting Android junk, so I do not applaud for this reactive marketing idea.
 
Am I the only one hoping they won't go with a curved display? It adds absolutely nothing of value... Other than perhaps looking cool the first time you see the phone. After that point it just becomes annoying. It makes the phone much harder to hold without accidentally touch the display (yeah I have a Galaxy S7 Edge and this happens all the time when using it with one hand..) and the portion of the display that is curved is useless as everything displayed in this area gets distorted so having a 5,5-inch curved display gives you less usable screen area compared to a 5,5-inch flat display.

With that said, I'm all for a "Edge-to-Edge" display. Having lips on the left and right side of the display is wasted space. But you don't need to wrap the damn display around the edges...
 
Am I the only one hoping they won't go with a curved display? It adds absolutely nothing of value... Other than perhaps looking cool the first time you see the phone. After that point it just becomes annoying. It makes the phone much harder to hold without accidentally touch the display (yeah I have a Galaxy S7 Edge and this happens all the time when using it with one hand..) and the portion of the display that is curved is useless as everything displayed in this area gets distorted so having a 5,5-inch curved display gives you less usable screen area compared to a 5,5-inch flat display.

With that said, I'm all for a "Edge-to-Edge" display. Having lips on the left and right side of the display is wasted space. But you don't need to wrap the damn display around the edges...

I'm waiting to see what's announced, i think if Apple are doing this curved display then they will probably do it differently and add their own thing, so i will reserve judgment until we see it in September.
 
USB-C is not gonna happen. Soon, there will be 1 billion devices in the market that use the Lightning connector standard. And what does USB-C provide over Lightning when it comes to mobile devices? Nothing. Aside from allowing geeks to carry one less cable. With the added risk of unhappy customers when their iPhones catch on fire from using 50cent USB-C charge cables. At least with MFi certification, Apple tries to make a good experience possible. Yes, I know about USB-IF, but there is no way for Apple to run that whole show.

And before you say "but but but the laptops (and soon desktops) have USB-C". That is for a different type of consumer, more likely to use the cable in the box, vs. using 17 year olds using some random USB-C left in their rental car to fry their phone when they plug it in.
 
that would sure be awesome, especially for the iPad which needs USB-C extremely badly to push it to the next level. I don't think Apple will do it though because the lightning connector is thinner
 
USB-C is not gonna happen. Soon, there will be 1 billion devices in the market that use the Lightning connector standard. And what does USB-C provide over Lightning when it comes to mobile devices? Nothing. Aside from allowing geeks to carry one less cable. With the added risk of unhappy customers when their iPhones catch on fire from using 50cent USB-C charge cables. At least with MFi certification, Apple tries to make a good experience possible. Yes, I know about USB-IF, but there is no way for Apple to run that whole show.

And before you say "but but but the laptops (and soon desktops) have USB-C". That is for a different type of consumer, more likely to use the cable in the box, vs. using 17 year olds using some random USB-C left in their rental car to fry their phone when they plug it in.

It didn't stop them from cutting off the old connector to go with Lightening Connectors. I can totally see them just cutting off Lightening.
 
On the surface it sounds like USB-C would be an improvement. But has Apple's USB-C implementation truly been according to that universal standard or do they do things within that standard that are not quite standard? Clearly, a USB-C connector will physically fit but electronically, are USB-C cables, adapters, and dongles identical?

I'm not implying that they're not, but there is an implied assumption that they are.
If they were to deviate from the standard they would have to give it another name (Firewire as opposed to IE1394) at that point they may as well stick with Lightning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirunJae
USB-C is not gonna happen. Soon, there will be 1 billion devices in the market that use the Lightning connector standard. And what does USB-C provide over Lightning when it comes to mobile devices? Nothing. Aside from allowing geeks to carry one less cable. With the added risk of unhappy customers when their iPhones catch on fire from using 50cent USB-C charge cables. At least with MFi certification, Apple tries to make a good experience possible. Yes, I know about USB-IF, but there is no way for Apple to run that whole show.

And before you say "but but but the laptops (and soon desktops) have USB-C". That is for a different type of consumer, more likely to use the cable in the box, vs. using 17 year olds using some random USB-C left in their rental car to fry their phone when they plug it in.


Tons of people had the old dock connector and they changed that too. USB-C offers a ton of advantages when it comes to being able to kick iOS up to the next level regarding getting data on and off. iPad needs USB-C very badly to allow it to become a true PC replacement
 
I'd be stunned if Tim Cook's Apple would be willing to give up their very lucrative side business selling and licensing cables and connected devices made for iPhone.

What they do on the Mac side is irrelevant. It's a dead legacy platform on life support. I can't see them adopting a standard connector on their much more important iOS devices. There's just too much money at stake.
 
Apple will NEVER switch to USB-C for iOS devices, especially iPhones, for one major reason - USB-C is BIGGER than Lightning, and Apple is obsessed with smaller. That was one of the reasons for Lightning in the first place. A Lightning cable can almost fit inside of a USB-C cable. I just tried it with the one for my '16 MacBook. If Lightning was about 1mm thinner, it would fit. That means the housing of the USB-C connector is roughly 2mm larger than Lightning. 2mm inside an iPhone is 2mm Apple doesn't have room for, especially in the quest for ever thinner iPhones.

Besides, it's still easier to plug in a Lightning cable than it is a USB-C cable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kruegdude
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.