Well if Apple falls behind developers might abandon it for steam who doesn’t impose such draconian limits.
How do you interpret it to be gone?
It absolutely did as your points didn’t refute the existing breach of your wallet garden of my original point making this a sliding scale, and nether did you defend the status quo when I pointed out an existing more secure option employed on Mac.
Except: isn’t access to the SE part of the EU’s demands? I remember reading that a while ago.
Nope, the access already provided is sufficient. Perhaps you’re thinking of the NFC chip or something else?
The thing about talented smart ppl is that they will find ways to "fix" problems to benefit them not necessarily you. And if they are really smart that reaches a whole new lvl
it wont be a flimsy networking restriction, it will be an OS signing certificate, like regionality of dvd's. Super likely to be highlighted in the clause in the user agreement, allowing them to brick the device if tampering is detected.
But that's the point here. People are used to Apple’s support. They will come to the Store and whine about their misbehaving devices. If they are sent away, Apple’s brand will suffer.
You saying you took responsibility by actively choosing a system that gives you none
The world needs to move on, though. Or should we keep using rotary phones because they're better than what came before?
Didn't you just say you make other responsible choices by delegating to others? I feel you might think this is a bigger gotcha that it's going to turn out to be...
I beg you, please show me *anything* that proves your point.
You say you take responsibility then go on to say you delegate it. I plainly say I don't take responsibility for my car safety because there are systems designed to test it.
Can you trace this thread back to understand what you're jumping into the middle of and then explain why the answer to that matters?
Oh, if they ever so slightly alter the functionality of the phone remotely like that they'd open up to a lawsuit so big it'll nuke them from orbit
Really? You delegate your safety testing of your car to a company that tests it for you, how is that different?
Everyone can make up points to support their argument. For example, I could say that outside of this forum everyone is happy for this.
I don't brag that I'm "taking responsibility into my own hands"
Neither did I. I addressed a point being made by the person I was responding to before you interceded. Like I said, not the gotcha you were after.
You read the thread and then put something in quotations that is not a quote. Then requoted me yet again as though the reason why is self evident. There's no tree to bark up here.
My difficulty quoting you from my phone is not an argument against my point.
