I don't want freedom on my phone. I want my phone to be a closed and secure system. Very simple, you don't give everyone keys to your house. I also don't want to give everyone keys to my phone. And that's basically what the EU is requireing here. They (the EU) wants keys to everyone's phones. Because that would make it very easy for them to undermine everyone's privacy and security.
Also it's not freedom what the EU is requesting. Because right now you have the freedom to chose between a closed secure system and an open less secure system (Android). In the future you won't have this choice. iOS would be exactly the same as Android because of this, only with a better UI.
Yea, it is freedom the EU is legally requiring (not ‘requesting’). Basically everything about this post is wrong and full of logical fallacies, so let me break it down for you:
- First of all, the EU doesn’t want the ‘keys to everyone’s phones’. I have no idea what you’re basing this on. But to follow you analogy: currently Apple has the keys to your phone. maybe you want to install a new couch in your living room. Currently that’s only possible if Apple approves it, because they won’t unlock the door if it’s not an Apple-approved couch. Under the new law Apple is required to give YOU the key to YOUR house. So you can unlock the door and install whatever couch you choose.
- ‘The EU’ doesn’t get any ‘keys’. YOU get YOUR key.
- Only if you CHOOSE to. You don’t have to. You can still let Apple keep the key and worry about keeping your phone secure. Nothing changes in that regard.
- The only thing that changes is that before; If you asked for the key, Apple would just say no. Now, they will have to say yes, and give you the key. But *only if you want to*.
- If you don’t want to - nothing changes. It’s just as secure as it always was.
- That’s freedom. That’s choice. The current situation (and what will probably remain the situation in the US) is not freedom.
And before people start with the argument that the ‘freedom’ is the ability to ‘choose’ android… well, there is no ‘free choice’ if you can’t *really* choose something else. iPhone is widely popular among young people. They will feel socially pressured into getting an iPhone, because otherwise they won’t fit in with their peers. A young person that wants to chat with their friends is pretty much forced to get an iPhone, or they’ll be excluded from the iMessage group chat. Yes there are technically alternatives, but really, there’s not. That’s why Apple is a gatekeeper, and that’s why the EU wants to and needs to enforce freedom.
I’m actually shocked at how many people honestly believe that Apple wants to prevent sideloading for *your* benefit. It’s literally only about their bottom line. If they could legally require sideloaded apps to pay the same commission, they wouldn’t care and it would’ve been an option for a decade already. It’s only about money. Don’t be so naive, please.
Also as a closing remark: freedom and choice is meant for the people. Not for large multinational companies. I couldn’t care less if they have freedom to do whatever they want or not. If there’s one thing large companies have proven, over and over again, is that they have no problem using the ‘freedom’ they get to increase profits, over the backs of normal people.