As long as we are giving credence to anecdotal evidence, my alarms went off as usual this morning. A little extra sleep would have been nice but no alarm problems here. 
As long as we are giving credence to anecdotal evidence, my alarms went off as usual this morning. A little extra sleep would have been nice but no alarm problems here.![]()
It seems so....
Maybe you could give them a pass for messing up daylight savings time - but surely someone at Apple should have known that 1 January was coming!
I do NOT blame Apple for this. It is VERY hard to debug programs that are to sense future clock/calendar readings. The answer, and not just for this reason, is reform of our clock settings and calendar readings to permanent universal constants (easy to do technically, but not administratively). Here's the page:
http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendar.html
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Wow, Apple has crap quality control. Then again, programming isn't a strong point for Apple: just look at the horrid mess that is iTunes.
I do NOT blame Apple for this. It is VERY hard to debug programs that are to sense future clock/calendar readings. The answer, and not just for this reason, is reform of our clock settings and calendar readings to permanent universal constants (easy to do technically, but not administratively). Here's the page:
http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendar.html
Exactly what are the problems with iTunes (except from the fact that you can't switch between different iTunes libraries, e.g. lossy and Losless) without relaunching iTunes![]()
I use itunes for my +50 GB music library, I often use it to convert and stream my music to my Denon receiver. So far I haven't encountered any bugs, perhaps some missing features, but nevertheless it's as far as I'm concerned great program with a nice interface and easily usable features
I do NOT blame Apple for this. It is VERY hard to debug programs that are to sense future clock/calendar readings.
Gotta love these made up stories. I'm willing to bet that more than 50% of the posts that said they were late for whatever reason due to this one bug are nothing but blatant lies just so they something to bitch about, even on the new year. If their time was so important to them they would have a backup plan and not rely on a portable device with limited battery life to keep them on track. I call it BS.![]()
henrystar said:AidenShaw said:It seems so....
Maybe you could give them a pass for messing up daylight savings time - but surely someone at Apple should have known that 1 January was coming!
I do NOT blame Apple for this. It is VERY hard to debug programs that are to sense future clock/calendar readings. The answer, and not just for this reason, is reform of our clock settings and calendar readings to permanent universal constants (easy to do technically, but not administratively). Here's the page:
http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendar.html
I do NOT blame Apple for this. It is VERY hard to debug programs that are to sense future clock/calendar readings. The answer, and not just for this reason, is reform of our clock settings and calendar readings to permanent universal constants (easy to do technically, but not administratively). Here's the page:
http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendar.html
News flash- that's what the alarm clock on a £699 phone is for too. It's not unreasonable to expect it to work properly.
Or Final Cut Pro, both of which are STILL in 2011 CARBON based 32 bit applications. While 64 bit may not be needed for iTunes, the fact that they are selling pro apps apps such as Final Cut Pro made with Carbon is an utter disgrace.
Hell, even Adobe moved to Cocoa already. If Adobe can do it, why can't Apple Consumer Electronics? Oh yeah, because they don't care about anything other then iOS, and even then I don't think they care much about the details like a correctly functioning clock.app
The last time there was a bug with clock.app a few months ago, Apple Consumer Electronics was warned MONTHS before about it. Yes MONTHS, and they still did nothing.
Oh, and Fortune / CNN is reporting that Apple Consumer Electronics did know about this bug as well.
Link
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Wow, Apple has crap quality control. Then again, programming isn't a strong point for Apple: just look at the horrid mess that is iTunes.
The bug really is egregious and this is a very very poor oversight from Apple. However, software bugs happen all the time, and to anyone.
They're likely scrambling to fix it now.
Apple doesn't sell any phone for £699 stop buying black market...especially when you can get it cheaper.
Yes, always use two alarms but regardless, this is an issue that should not happen.
The bug really is egregious and this is a very very poor oversight from Apple. However, software bugs happen all the time, and to anyone.
Hope the fix comes out soon.
If you're gonna cite something read it first. There is lot of work involved in transitioning a beast like Final Cut Studio to cocoa which takes time (2-3yrs or more) and they've been/are still working hard on it...it's not like they are just sitting around playing paper toss.
Yes, I agree, it's an issue that "shouldn't" happen, but since we're dealing with computer generated products, crap can happen, simple as that. Every single person on this forum has had an issue one time or another with their Mac or the Windows machine, what do they do about it? Kill Steve Jobs or Steve Emballmer? No, they just deal with it and move on. It's silly for this forum to go into labor over this. That's why I know most people here are lying about these late stories. It's not serious enough to cause such a ruckus.
It looks like the fix is coming on 3 January.
Hmmm. There were lots of posts around here calling Adobe "lazy" (or worse) for Adobe's Cocoa porting schedule. It looks like Apple is held to a lower standard.
Well, it'd be nice if it stated that in your profile to the left of the post, wouldn't it?![]()
Dude, I can smell the kool-aid on your breath.
Hard or not, it still should have been verified. Its not like a 9.99 piece of tech, these phones cost hundreds of dollars, and therefore DEMAND the best coding and programming. If a Casio watch from 1985 can do it, then why not an iPhone that is multiple orders of magnitude more advanced? Sorry, the excuse you offer just does not wash.