Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
When you play a movie, a dark (black) color is inverted and you can't see it properly. Many people already reported this problem. All the touches in the store have same symptoms. I was told this problem is only for touches. Oh, this doesn't affect to animation film....

There are four big tables, which exhibit MacBook, MacBook Pro, iPod, in the ground floor. The iPod touch occupied one table and about 10(?) touches are there.

You should go and experience the multi-touch. So much fun. :D
Oh, strangely... safari loading is a bit slow even under wifi.

so when you say it's a problem, a problem that can be resolved or is that just the way they are?, what's the apple staff saying about it.
hopefully no such problems on the iphone
 
so when you say it's a problem, a problem that can be resolved or is that just the way they are?, what's the apple staff saying about it.
hopefully no such problems on the iphone

I have no idea whether it can be resolved or should be recalled. I didn't asked about it cos didn't want to make them upset. :D

See this...

http://www.appleinsider.com/article...ouch_players_shipped_with_faulty_screens.html

Interesting... Apple said some 16GB touches, but in the Glasgow store I remember all of them were 8GB. Maybe I am wrong.
 
Nice one and that GPS is soooo important ! Yeah right..... tell who would every use GPS on foot ?

Anyone who goes hiking / mountain climbing.

That said, a phone GPS would be more of a backup role in case the more sensitive and useful dedicated Garmin GPS failed, in addition to a good old fashioned map and compass as a last resort.
 
Anyone who goes hiking / mountain climbing.

That said, a phone GPS would be more of a backup role in case the more sensitive and useful dedicated Garmin GPS failed, in addition to a good old fashioned map and compass as a last resort.

OMG do you guys ever stop.... Apple don't want you as customers.... yes Apple need to develop GPS in iPhone's for the 0.00000002% of people who need it for the reason mentioned above...... apple are smart they know that GPS is not a must have... that there are units out there that mountain climbers will buy not half-ar*ed unit in a phone... thats why Google Maps in a much better choice...
 
OMG do you guys ever stop.... Apple don't want you as customers.... yes Apple need to develop GPS in iPhone's for the 0.00000002% of people who need it for the reason mentioned above...... apple are smart they know that GPS is not a must have... that there are units out there that mountain climbers will buy not half-ar*ed unit in a phone... thats why Google Maps in a much better choice...

Down, fanboy! Retract your claws! :eek:

I didn't actually say I wanted a GPS in the iPhone. Hell I don't even have plans to buy an iPhone at this moment in time. I was just answering your question of "who would ever(y) use a GPS on foot?" - nothing more. If you don't want your question answered, don't ask it :)
 
I've decided to import an iphone, mainly due to the dissapointing tarriffs.

I've upgraded my current O2 contract to the £35 - 600min/1000texts (more importantly 12month) and recieved the N95 free (which will be sold to cover iphone costs).

Once my new contract SIM goes into the iphone, I presume due to having no data package, using EDGE will incur costs. What about when i'm connected to a local wi-fi?
 
I've decided to import an iphone, mainly due to the dissapointing tarriffs.

I've upgraded my current O2 contract to the £35 - 600min/1000texts (more importantly 12month) and recieved the N95 free (which will be sold to cover iphone costs).

Once my new contract SIM goes into the iphone, I presume due to having no data package, using EDGE will incur costs. What about when i'm connected to a local wi-fi?

Wi-Fi won't incur a cost unless you have an account with someone who charges for it.
 
Thanks for that.

Initial dissapointment is over now I'm getting a reasonable deal. Hope the firmware exploits keep rolling out.
 
Down, fanboy! Retract your claws! :eek:

I didn't actually say I wanted a GPS in the iPhone. Hell I don't even have plans to buy an iPhone at this moment in time. I was just answering your question of "who would ever(y) use a GPS on foot?" - nothing more. If you don't want your question answered, don't ask it :)

Yes we need a 3.5 inch floopy drive in the iMac.... remember that ? How can they produce a PC without a floppy drive ? how will I transfer files from my work PC to home.... this is crazy ! Jobs knew that the internet and email was the new way to transfer files not floppies.... he knows the same of 3G..... Wi-Fi is the only way.... why ? Because the speed of Wi-Fi is limitless... 3G cannot go any faster than it already does without major upgrades and investment from the networks.... and that will only happen if they charge you the customer back !
 
Wi-Fi is the only way.... why ? Because the speed of Wi-Fi is limitless... 3G cannot go any faster than it already does without major upgrades and investment from the networks.... and that will only happen if they charge you the customer back !

Wireless speeds may be limitless, but range isn't - or at least not without similarly huge investment.

Sonic
 
Wireless speeds may be limitless, but range isn't - or at least not without similarly huge investment.

Sonic

...from the Government. This is a lot different and it will be free. Free investment and free to use. I'll let you choose which technology you want to use......
 
Yes we need a 3.5 inch floopy drive in the iMac.... remember that ? How can they produce a PC without a floppy drive ? how will I transfer files from my work PC to home.... this is crazy ! Jobs knew that the internet and email was the new way to transfer files not floppies.... he knows the same of 3G..... Wi-Fi is the only way.... why ? Because the speed of Wi-Fi is limitless... 3G cannot go any faster than it already does without major upgrades and investment from the networks.... and that will only happen if they charge you the customer back !

Do you even read the posts you're responding to? And what's 3G got to do with GPS?

FWIW 3G coverage is pretty good in the UK, which is probably one of the reasons why Jobs has already said he expects a 3G iPhone towards the end of 2008. But that's got nothing to do with the GPS question...
 
Do you even read the posts you're responding to? And what's 3G got to do with GPS?

FWIW 3G coverage is pretty good in the UK, which is probably one of the reasons why Jobs has already said he expects a 3G iPhone towards the end of 2008. But that's got nothing to do with the GPS question...

A lot...... because everyone says the phone is useless without GPS...... but its not... its better without GPS...... we would all prefer a lighter, slimmer phone than having GPS which is just a gimmick.... you know it and I know it…….. GPS is for cars not on foot.... cars have GPS built into them now as standard.... or for £200 you can get your own..... Google maps in so much better on foot than a GPS....... have you ever seen the GPS on a Nokia ? OMG... the Nokia CEO should be locked up for installing something so useless...... like I said before.... in the 80's men would buy bigger cars due to a lack of a larger body part... these days men krap on how big their hard-drives are or how many features they have on their phones (useless or not) to compensate for being so small in other areas........

Whiteboytrash smashes Cloudane serve into the back of the court for a clean winner !!
 
A lot...... because everyone says the phone is useless without GPS...... but its not... its better without GPS...... we would all prefer a lighter, slimmer phone than having GPS which is just a gimmick.... you know it and I know it…….. GPS is for cars not on foot.... cars have GPS built into them now as standard.... or for £200 you can get your own..... Google maps in so much better on foot than a GPS....... have you ever seen the GPS on a Nokia ? OMG... the Nokia CEO should be locked up for installing something so useless...... like I said before.... in the 80's men would buy bigger cars due to a lack of a larger body part... these days men krap on how big their hard-drives are or how many features they have on their phones (useless or not) to compensate for being so small in other areas........

I actually agree (which is why I keep wondering if you've read any of my comments, I think you hate GPS sooooo much that you just see red whenever it's mentioned, start spewing flames and don't actually read the post). There's no need for a GPS in the iPhone or any kind of phone, I AGREE. It just fattens the phone, flattens the battery and when you're stuck up a mountain you'll know where you are but can't make an emergency call because the battery's gone flat. But hey, at least you know the exact co-ordinates of your place of death :D

The ONLY thing I was EVER doing was answering your question of "who would take a GPS on foot". Forget the iPhone, it's irrelevant, your question was whether anyone would take a GPS on foot. And the answer is a resounding Yes - the GPS was first invented for use on foot! First for the military (soldiers on foot as well as vehicles), then for the keen walker, and *then* the extension known as SatNav was invented - that's your "car GPS". Is there any point in having one in a phone? No. (though if it's there, might as well keep it as an emergency backup). Do people use GPS on foot? Go sign up for one of the numerous GPS forums out there and start a poll, I think you'll find they do (but you might want to lose the attitude first, GPS forums are mostly populated by grown-ups.)


Are you sure of that fact? Esp. O2.

Sadly O2 is the worst for 3G, I think they have a few transmitters in London and that's about it. But Three have some pretty good coverage - even in this small town out in the sticks you can get a 3G signal most of the time. It's not as widespread as 2G (it roams onto O2 and Orange when there's no 3G) but on the whole very good.
 
No you're missing my points. GPS is used on foot. GPS is used in a car. However people who use them in these contexts use specialist modals not a half ar*ed attempt in a phone. Period. End of story. Mountaineers aint going to purchase a Nokia for the GPS unit. They are going to buy a specialist Garmin unit so they really know the co-ordinates of there death. The Nokia GPS has very little in the way of maps in fact you have to download them at a charge ! (is that why you need 3G ?)....... drivers in cars will use GPS with maps of England and Europe... a phone would never be able to fit all that in with everything else. iPhone doesn’t need GPS and it doesn’t need 3G. What it needs is Wi-Fi and its got that !


I actually agree (which is why I keep wondering if you've read any of my comments, I think you hate GPS sooooo much that you just see red whenever it's mentioned, start spewing flames and don't actually read the post). There's no need for a GPS in the iPhone or any kind of phone, I AGREE. It just fattens the phone, flattens the battery and when you're stuck up a mountain you'll know where you are but can't make an emergency call because the battery's gone flat. But hey, at least you know the exact co-ordinates of your place of death :D

The ONLY thing I was EVER doing was answering your question of "who would take a GPS on foot". Forget the iPhone, it's irrelevant, your question was whether anyone would take a GPS on foot. And the answer is a resounding Yes - the GPS was first invented for use on foot! First for the military (soldiers on foot as well as vehicles), then for the keen walker, and *then* the extension known as SatNav was invented - that's your "car GPS". Is there any point in having one in a phone? No. (though if it's there, might as well keep it as an emergency backup). Do people use GPS on foot? Go sign up for one of the numerous GPS forums out there and start a poll, I think you'll find they do (but you might want to lose the attitude first, GPS forums are mostly populated by grown-ups.)




Sadly O2 is the worst for 3G, I think they have a few transmitters in London and that's about it. But Three have some pretty good coverage - even in this small town out in the sticks you can get a 3G signal most of the time. It's not as widespread as 2G (it roams onto O2 and Orange when there's no 3G) but on the whole very good.
 
No you're missing my points. GPS is used on foot. GPS is used in a car. However people who use them in these contexts use specialist modals not a half ar*ed attempt in a phone. Period. End of story. Mountaineers aint going to purchase a Nokia for the GPS unit. They are going to buy a specialist Garmin unit so they really know the co-ordinates of there death. The Nokia GPS has very little in the way of maps in fact you have to download them at a charge ! (is that why you need 3G ?)....... drivers in cars will use GPS with maps of England and Europe... a phone would never be able to fit all that in with everything else. iPhone doesn’t need GPS and it doesn’t need 3G. What it needs is Wi-Fi and its got that !

You did it again!! I give up. READ MY POST. You will find that I AGREE WITH YOU. GPS in a phone is pointless. When it comes to walking any sensible walker (who DO use GPSes) would use a specialised Garmin unit (as you said, and as *I* said before you!!), in addition to a map and compass.

I'm not even going to continue this discussion because you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
 
I wouldn't worry about it Cloudane, people don't seem to be reading earlier responses. Not surprising given there are over 900 of them now, but for those that say O2 3G coverage is crap, this is simply not true. HSDPA coverage is surprisingly good in the most populated areas of the UK - particularly across the South, it's not just 'a couple of transmitters in London'.

You want to see bad coverage - well enjoy the 30% EDGE coverage O2 are going to have on November 9th. They have absolutely no incentive to spend hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, in upgrading all their transmitters to EDGE considering Steve Jobs has said a 3G iPhone is around the corner.
 
I wouldn't worry about it Cloudane, people don't seem to be reading earlier responses. Not surprising given there are over 900 of them now, but for those that say O2 3G coverage is crap, this is simply not true. HSDPA coverage is surprisingly good in the most populated areas of the UK - particularly across the South, it's not just 'a couple of transmitters in London'.

You want to see bad coverage - well enjoy the 30% EDGE coverage O2 are going to have on November 9th. They have absolutely no incentive to spend hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, in upgrading all their transmitters to EDGE considering Steve Jobs has said a 3G iPhone is around the corner.

O2 3G coverage is dark blue on this map. It's not that good. I would esitmate less than 30%.

1380530641_375848e896_o.png
 
Oh deary me. Please, read back before posting nonsense. Dark blue on that map is HSDPA. Some of the lighter blue is the slower, but still 3G, UTMS R99.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.