Apologies. That wasn't clear from your quote (or my lack of coffee). Although I knew the reason for the difference, my goal was simply to point out the incorrect numbers being quoted. 79% is still an unbelievably amazing number that requires no embellishment - accidentally or purposely.The reason Apple's share was, according to the Strategy Analytics estimates that his link referenced, so high for the third quarter was Samsung's profits were tiny for that quarter. That was in large part because of the Note 7 problem. As you suggest, for the whole year Apple's profit share wasn't as high. Most of the difference has to do with Samsung. For the whole year it made substantial profits, but if we look at only the third quarter it made almost none.
I was agreeing with you and providing the main reason for the difference between the number they offered (i.e. the 91% from their link) and the number you offered (79%).