Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's utterly pathetic.

"we plan to have an iPhone SDK in developers' hands in February" - That was October. Now 4 months later, they're saying they need another 4 months? They got the development plan wrong by 100% ?

Doug

Operative words: "...in developers' hands".
he didn't say 'in the hands of every bedroom coder'.
Seems pretty clear that a big hunk of the serious development community already has it and is producing code.
 
Well... not entirely true. Lots of Java developers have 32 bit macs that aren't very old at all, and can now no longer use the machine to develop for the latest and greatest because there is only a 64-bit beta of Java 6. So these guys (myself included) have a choice- buy a new 64-bit Mac, or buy something else, like an Dell laptop with Ubutu- thus gaining a great development machine but losing all the other great things about OS X.

I suspect that a 64 bit Mac bought today will be good for a while though. I wouldn't be surprised if 10.6 ends up being Intel-only, and 10.7 drops 32 bit support.

Now that the iPhone/iTouch is more of a computer than an iPod, it will be interesting to see how long a given model stays compatible with new firmware, software, accessories, etc.

As I'm in the middle of dealing with some major issues with Java 1.6, you can color me unimpressed ;)

Leopard goes all the way back to 867Mhz G4s, which is something like a 2002 timeframe. Apple was selling G5 systems through 2005, so based on the same time scale you'd expect the G5 to be supported by new OS releases until 2011. That suggests there's plenty of time for one more PowerPC-compatible release, though I guess nobody knows for sure. 32-bit-only Intel systems were sold for only a brief period, though, so I wouldn't be surprised if 32-bit Intel and PowerPC were dropped at the same time.
 
Just came back from a large gathering and virtually everyone there had a iPhone.
Not one knew the SDK was delayed or even what an SDK was.
I would say that the vast majority of iPhone owners don't know or care.
Half are still learning the basic features.
That, my cloistered friends, is the real world,
 
Apple I hate how you rip off the consumer by never doing things 100% the first time.

No offense (well, yeah... offense meant) but that's just ignorant.
Beyond the 'poor me... Apple hates us' diatribe, please advise of any product or software that has 'done things 100% the first time'.
 
No offense (well, yeah... offense meant) but that's just ignorant.
Beyond the 'poor me... Apple hates us' diatribe, please advise of any product or software that has 'done things 100% the first time'.

Do you get paid by the post?

:rolleyes:
 
Funny, you hear the same things on the Windows side for... Quicktime. The issue with flash on the mac side is really programming, on the windows side Flash is barely a blip in terms of system resources.

I for one WANT flash. Why? Because I want "the internet" not the "baby internet."

w00master

Do you WANT(for example) the fun and games provided by ActiveX malware as well? That's part of the 'grown-up' internet as well.

If grown-up internet means enormous, talking, Flash-based ads on every page I hit, then no thanks... I'll wait for Apple to force H.264
 
Rumors have been floating around for awhile now that some developers already got a "primitive" version of the SDK - so i hardly doubt (assuming this is true) that whatever they release next week will be THAT primitive. There have also been rumors that its been ready for awhile now but they needed to get patents before they could release it. so basically this article means nothing - it just another rumor. Why get mad at apple until we know the truth. my guess is they will release the SDK to more developers next week. They will have some business applications that will be announced. in any case it will take developers some time to actually create applications. so its not like we will get 1,000's of applications next Thursday - they need to first get the ball rolling (hence road map).
 
I didnt say it was the fault of Apple that rollout of iPhone is going slowly, I just said it's going slowly.

-Stock price? How on Earth is this their fault?
-iPhone rollout probably has to do with the carriers. I doubt Apple would deliberately stall, do you?

Quit yer whingin'

True, I would rather have a good product, but that doesn't take away something is delayed again. That is what dissapoints me. Surprises me how I get attacked afther a bad comment about Apple. Wonder when the PR team will be standing before my house to shut my mouth because of bad PR...:rolleyes:

I would rather them be late and get it right than put a Microsoft-quality product out there.
 
SOT iPhone promotion idea...

When we bought our iPhones, our T-Mobile contract period had already been fulfilled, so we were able to switch to ATT on June 29, with no penalty.

Many posters on this, and other, forums have said that they would have purchased an iPhone, except that it would cost too much $ to break their contract.

Thinking out loud here... What if Apple, ATT and the other iPhone carriers (or both) offered an extra incentive to those tied to another carrier's contact:

-- Apple could offer Apple Store credits ($ or, say an iPod)
-- The carriers could offer reduced cost (for a period of time-- maybe with reduced reimbursement to Apple)
-- The carriers could offer additional services (or, say an iPod)

This would not need to offset the entire penalty-- just bring the "cost of switching" to iPhone to an acceptable/attractive level.
 
Ugh. I was looking forward to hearing announcements of apps I could add starting next week. What does this mean, we won't have apps until June?? Do you really think there's that much of a delay???
Are you insane? :confused:

You obviously have no idea what an SDK is. Even if it were announced and distributed *last* week (early), you still would not be able to download apps until someone writes them and Apple posts them for download.
 
Ok let me get this straight.
some Random Blogger says it's only a BetaSDK don't expect much.
Yet alot of people believe the bad news.

A 3LetterTitle Tells the Investors....
For iPhone atlas report
The Goldman Sachs moderator asked “Any idea when we’ll see the first iPhone third-party apps?” to which Cook responded:

“We’re going to go into some more details at the event next week. I don’t want to take away the element of surprise.”

You don't surprise people with bad news, we all know that's never a good plan. I'd say SDK release next week, with apps.
Maybe some API's won't appear until WWDC.
 
Do you WANT(for example) the fun and games provided by ActiveX malware as well? That's part of the 'grown-up' internet as well.

If grown-up internet means enormous, talking, Flash-based ads on every page I hit, then no thanks... I'll wait for Apple to force H.264

1st of all ActiveX is on the way out. Microsoft themselves are dismanteling this. Also, 99% of websites DO NOT USE ActiveX. Secondly, (as I stated in my post) Flash is a hog on APPLE products. It does not have to be this way. Flash on my windows machine (99% of the time) is barely a blip in terms of resources or memory. Hence, the reason why many Mac fans are "against flash" is b/c it sucks on the Mac platform. Guess what, it doesn't have to be.

Flash is on 99% of all desktops. Apple made the claim that the iPhone would be using "the internet" and not the "baby internet." So, to many (myself included) without Flash, the iPhone's internet experience is *still* the "baby internet."

The flash resource and memory issues on Apple products is a software problem and can be solved. The lack of flash on the iPhone is more of a "war" between Apple and Adobe then anything. However, my continue rants against this are b/c Apple made the bold claim that the browsing experience with the iPhone would be the "internet." I (and many others) still content without Flash, this "bold claim" is not true at all and is still the "baby internet."

w00master
 
okay, I only develop simple applications, so I;m no expert but....

I'm finding it hard to believe that its taking apple this long to release an SDK, the iPhone Hackers seem to have thrown together a pretty good system in very little time, I think that the reasons that this is taking so long, are either, patent issues, or the delivery system.

The hackers haven't done ANYTHING notable. They simply reverse engineered the API and SPIs that are already available on MobileOSX. This has nothing to do with creating a set of APIs which will work next month, next year and for the next decade to come. Creating a REAL SDK is a non-trivial work. Projects like this always take longer than expected.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A102 Safari/419.3)

I heard that Steves personal iPhone is pimped out with nine pages of new SDKs!

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A102 Safari/419.3)

or should I say SDK developed apps

Hehe. I had considered replying to your earlier comments.
Good catch. ;)
 
People who think this should have just happened overnight have no idea just how much work goes into something like this. Making a third party software environment that is reliable, consistent, supportable, and secure takes a lot more work that the (admittedly impressive) work that the hacking/hobbyist community has done. If only I had a nickel for every time my Treo 700p crashed or was utterly hosed or unstable because of one garbage app or another. Certainly Apple could adopt the free-for-all model, but Apple prefers a, shall we say, more "refined" experience when it comes to consumer products, especially for its first foray into a major new marketplace. And that necessarily includes the iTunes selection and syncing paradigm.

The comments above (and the couple below this, and probably about 99% of the rest in this thread) typify the reaction by those who have literally no idea just how much work goes into developing such an initiative. I wouldn't go so far as to say "ignorant" or "completely unable to see the big picture beyond what new little icon they'll have on their phone", but close. Apple is taking baby steps here, and an SDK allowing third party development is a massive undertaking if you want to have an element of control over the process, and the beautiful integration people have come to expect, overall, from Apple products.

"What's going on in Cupertino?" Please. You have NO IDEA how many people are working on this, and how high a priority this is for Apple.

hear hear!
 
Back on topic...

I agree with some that people need to "chill out" about this nonsense that Apple is "becoming like MS" for "releasing the SDK late!" This ain't easy stuff.

In any case, I'm gonna make some predictions on this upcoming event:

1. SDK in beta (duh) will be given to developers for testing
2. Update to iTunes
3. The rumor that early versions of the SDK were given to some developers will turn out to be true, and there will be "some" apps for users to download.
4. Preview/hints on iPhone v2.

Of course, I'll probably be wrong. :p

w00master
 
3. The rumor that early versions of the SDK were given to some developers will turn out to be true, and there will be "some" apps for users to download.

Why would you expect apps? This is an SDK release. What 3rd party apps people release has nothing to do with Apple. Your just setting yourself up for disappointment. What "apps" are you expecting?
 
Apple is becoming like Microsoft releasing everything late. ;)

Apple had better stop poking fun of MS for lateness however. Steve is always quick to put in a little dig here and there. Man who live in glass house should not throw stones.
 
People who think this should have just happened overnight have no idea just how much work goes into something like this. Making a third party software environment that is reliable, consistent, supportable, and secure takes a lot more work that the (admittedly impressive) work that the hacking/hobbyist community has done. If only I had a nickel for every time my Treo 700p crashed or was utterly hosed or unstable because of one garbage app or another. Certainly Apple could adopt the free-for-all model, but Apple prefers a, shall we say, more "refined" experience when it comes to consumer products, especially for its first foray into a major new marketplace. And that necessarily includes the iTunes selection and syncing paradigm.

The comments above (and the couple below this, and probably about 99% of the rest in this thread) typify the reaction by those who have literally no idea just how much work goes into developing such an initiative. I wouldn't go so far as to say "ignorant" or "completely unable to see the big picture beyond what new little icon they'll have on their phone", but close. Apple is taking baby steps here, and an SDK allowing third party development is a massive undertaking if you want to have an element of control over the process, and the beautiful integration people have come to expect, overall, from Apple products.

"What's going on in Cupertino?" Please. You have NO IDEA how many people are working on this, and how high a priority this is for Apple.

I'm not even going to read through this whole thread cuz I'm sure there's going to be a whole lot of mirror posts of this one.

All I really need to say is that if the SDK takes SOOOOOO much work and everybody should know this, then APPLE should know it better than anyone and shouldn't have projected the release for February.

Quit defending their mistakes!!! Gah!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.