I have the 6s and am definitely going with the SE.
- One-handed design
- Incredible battery life
- Beautiful 5s design (with no ugly camera bulge!)
- Great value price
- No curved screen nonsense so edge to edge protectors work perfectly
+1
plus:
- You can take it in your pocket with you, even in the shirt pocket.
- I can continue to use my sennheiser cxc 700 headphones with the 3,5mm jack
- business-people go on to take me serious because I don´t use a gamer-phone
- doesn´t bent
- the iPhone5 form factor (still use two iPhone 5 without any problem) and technology has been proved as very reliable (Important for business)
- after purchase of the SE: no need to look for a new iPhone again until 2020 or later…. if as reliable as the iP5.
- I can go on to use all of my "old" iPhone 5 accessoirs.
apple did a damn good job - at least for one single time:
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...ing-battery-life.1958228/page-3#post-22700266
.
[doublepost=1458667398][/doublepost]
Yep, they did for the selfies. Its on the Apple store site and mentioned on another site as well. Photos are going to be a little more grainie and dark. Rear camera will have the f2.2
The difference between a f=2.2 and f=2.4 lens is nothing worth mentioning (Except, of course, the apple marketing people).
To give you an example: current lenses have as well to obey the physics law in optical construction that they half/double light transmission with every step. that means you need double the time of exposition. So a f= 2.8 lens will need double the exposition time of a 2.0 lens.
Now you guess already that the difference between (f) 2,2 and 2,4 lenses about exposition time are near zero - and you are right.
Not all people understand that the "numbers" of apertures of lenses follow a logarhytmic calculation:
each of the following full aperture steps above doubles the light transmission onto the sensor:
(f) 1,4 - 2,0 - 2,8 - 4,0 - 5,6 - 8,0
so you see: the only difference between f=2,2 and f=2,4 is about marketing….
Last edited: