People expect Android to be hacked. People expect. Apple to be better.Don’t even pay attention to them. Just haters waiting for ANYTHING to complain about.
People expect Android to be hacked. People expect. Apple to be better.Don’t even pay attention to them. Just haters waiting for ANYTHING to complain about.
In under 48 hours? Highly unlikely.Should be if law enforcement ever needs into it. The FBI would totally manufacture masks based off of your face.
It is. Wasn’t hacked until we see setup process. Your data is safe...safer than with TouchID.People expect Android to be hacked. People expect. Apple to be better.
Should be if law enforcement ever needs into it. The FBI would totally manufacture masks based off of your face.
Many apologies. I hear Windows phone is da bomb!
[doublepost=1511836901][/doublepost]
And FBI can’t with fingerprints and playdoh?
Haha. Now I understand your patronizing tone. I totally responded to the wrong comment.. LOL sorry, my bad.It is. Wasn’t hacked until we see setup process. Your data is safe...safer than with TouchID.
It’s ok buddy.
“" but it's worth noting that fooling Face ID in this way requires a 3D printer, several hundred dollars worth of materials, physical access to a person's iPhone X, and detailed facial photographs that can be used to reconstruct a person's face.”
If someone wants to go through all of this just to get into my phone. I would be so flattered I would just hand it to them unlocked.
So basically just an opinion. Got it.Their products and software.
And I hope that the public isn't foolish enough to believe that they should be concerned about the security of their phone because of Face ID. Maybe if you were a spy or a high ranking official there might be a tiny bit of thought given to this. To the tens of millions of X users, there is nothing to lose sleep over. You're not important enough for someone to go through all of the effort to access your phone.
As described in an accompanying blog post, Bkav used a 3D printed mask made of stone powder, which cost approximately $200 to produce. 2D infrared images of eyes were then taped over the mask to emulate real eyes.
Bkav claims the materials and tools used to create the mask are "casual for anyone" and that Face ID is "not secure enough to be used in business transactions," but it's worth noting that fooling Face ID in this way requires a 3D printer, several hundred dollars worth of materials, physical access to a person's iPhone X, and detailed facial photographs that can be used to reconstruct a person's face. Even then, if the 3D printed mask and the design of the infrared eyes aren't perfect, Face ID will fail after five attempts.
I don't have the keys to Fort Knox I get it...I never intended to come off as someone important enough for anyone to care about stealing my private information. I think this is where you misunderstand that I'm merely pointing out that FaceID is not as secure as TouchID. It's harder to replicate someone's fingerprint unless you are really hellbent on getting their fingerprint for purposes of stealing their identity, in which case, millions of X users should care about. If they have Apple Pay set up, Keychain turned on to use for passwords and credit cards, etc (for example). If you don't think that's information that anyone should worry about someone stealing then you have more confidence in FaceID than some people. I happen to care a lot about security and privacy, and all these recent videos that are coming out, doesn't give me 100% confidence that my information is more secure than before.
You realize that people can lift your prints from anywhere you’ve been. And now they can just take a decent picture of your finger...use your kids PLAYDOH and voila!! Your TouchID is open doors!
Again, it is far EASIER and CHEAPER to break into TouchID.
You realize that people can lift your prints from anywhere you’ve been. And now they can just take a decent picture of your finger...use your kids PLAYDOH and voila!! Your TouchID is open doors!
Again, it is far EASIER and CHEAPER to break into TouchID.
I don't have the keys to Fort Knox I get it...I never intended to come off as someone important enough for anyone to care about stealing my private information. I think this is where you misunderstand that I'm merely pointing out that FaceID is not as secure as TouchID. It's harder to replicate someone's fingerprint unless you are really hellbent on getting their fingerprint for purposes of stealing their identity, in which case, millions of X users should care about. If they have Apple Pay set up, Keychain turned on to use for passwords and credit cards, etc (for example). If you don't think that's information that anyone should worry about someone stealing then you have more confidence in FaceID than some people. I happen to care a lot about security and privacy, and all these recent videos that are coming out, doesn't give me 100% confidence that my information is more secure than before.
So someone steals your phone. Then they have 48 hours to create an exact replica of your face, eyes and all. Then have two chances to get it unlocked.
Even in the video he has to concentrate very hard on we’re he puts the phone for it to unlock. I’d like to know how many chances he had to get it right
It is interesting. I think the real test would be to demonstrate unlocking a phone belonging to someone who was NOT cooperating with the effort. The subject should be aware of the test and consent, but should not pose for any scans. The mask data must be recorded in the ways you describe...with hidden cameras and he like.This is an interesting issue. We all pass by multiple locations where a 3D scan of our face could be made. Imagine when you looking up at the menu at a fast food place, or looking up to read the room number of a door. A generic (i.e. not with Apple proprietary face technology, but with industry standard 3D mapping technology) 3D scan is made of your face and picture of your face taken. Feed this generic data into a 3D printer to make mask. Combine mask with eye image, and there you go.
It would take alot of work and money to do and I doubt that anyone can even make an acurate enough mask first try from some picture and not a 3D modeling camera, and Face ID will probably disable before they can get in. Plus Touch ID is hardware, can only improve with hardware, Face ID is mostly software and can and probably will improve with software updates
I honestly don’t think you or anyone has anything to worry about now and especially in the future
It is interesting. I think the real test would be to demonstrate unlocking a phone belonging to someone who was NOT cooperating with the effort. The subject should be aware of the test and consent, but should not pose for any scans. The mask data must be recorded in the ways you describe...with hidden cameras and he like.