Apple receives licensing fees for Lightning based cables and peripherals. They don’t on USB-C.What? They 'lose money' with USB-C? That makes no sense. The reason for the slow transition is all about security issues as I understand it.
Nothing illegal about it no matter what Apple claims in their boilerplates.Not 100% sure, but it might be illegal to mod and sell.
ZeroEven if it sells for that much, how likely this guy gets sued and has to pay it all back or even more?
He can’t the same way Apple can‘t prevent him from modifying the phone and selling it. The only thing he can do is say he won’t help them repair it afterwards if they do those things and it breaks.Wonder why he is placing these exclusions. And even so how could he enforce them?
Why would they care? Their reasons for not yet switching the iPhone to USB-C do not include, "we can't figure out how to install a USB-C port".Watch, Apple will buy the iPhone themselves, LOL!
Pretty sad if they were forced to make the adapter legally rather than for the benefit of their users.I think the micro USB adapter was due to the EU.
There are dozens of third-parties that make these little lightning to usb-c adaptor tips.Can Apple just create a Lightning to USB-C adapter so I don’t need to carry two cables whenever I travel? I’m not sure why they had one for micro USB but not USB-C.
This, in truth, holds weight. And it had an entirely unique form factor from all precedent and subsequent iPhones.
I still believe there is something shady and fake about the device being auctioned. For example: being unable to restore the phone puts us in an awkward position regarding Keyloggers and other malware that could easily yield more value to the supposed student that made the device.
He also created the listing in a way that’s scripted so obviously with an original intent to sell. A more reasoned approach would have someone a bit more humble present it. Anyway.
Nothing "speaks" USB-C, what might be different is USB2 vs. USB3 (which is backwards compatible to USB2).
Plenty devices with USB-C that come with a charging cable ending in USB-A and USB-C to Lightning is also a thing.
-> iPhone will see the charger as a 3rd party USB2 charger (since it doesn't know about USB3), charger will see some run of the mill USB2 device and limit power output according to that standard.
Do they realize how many polishing cloths they could have ordered for that much money instead?
These adapters are all made by no-name companies. If a quality version of the product existed, we’d know about it. Have you ever seen one in a store or made by a recognizable company?There are dozens of third-parties that make these little lightning to usb-c adaptor tips.
$99K? I wonder if that includes overnight shipping? lol
You really believe it’s security issue huh? More like a money issue.What? They 'lose money' with USB-C? That makes no sense. The reason for the slow transition is all about security issues as I understand it.
I've read about some chargers that won't work with other devices, or devices that will only work with their own branded chargers.
He is unlikely to get sued. He modified a device, so be it. Many have before. Then again, he's also unlikely to get this $99k as well, which is no doubt a troll bid.Even if it sells for that much, how likely this guy gets sued and has to pay it all back or even more?