It sounds like people are bidding on this more as a collectable work of art rather than as a functional device.I want USB-C on my iPhone as much as everyone else....but why would someone pay anywhere near that much for this one
It sounds like people are bidding on this more as a collectable work of art rather than as a functional device.I want USB-C on my iPhone as much as everyone else....but why would someone pay anywhere near that much for this one
They aren’t real bids. I’ll be genuinely shocked if the transaction(s) ever completed.It sounds like people are bidding on this more as a collectable work of art rather than as a functional device.
They are allowed to. But they haven’t. USB C is the better option right now. Apple had the chance to make a clean switch with the iPhone X and chose not to, and at this point there’s no reason to keep lightning around other than control and greed.And by the way, if Apple were to come up with a new and better way of connecting to a mobile device would it be your position that they should not be allowed to put it into production until every other OEM is onboard with it?
Earlier this week, robotics student Ken Pillonel shared a video explaining how he modded an iPhone X with a functional USB-C port in place of the usual Lightning connector. The USB-C port works for both charging the iPhone and data transfer.
Pillonel also put the device up for auction on eBay, and bids are already topping a whopping $85,000. The listing describes the device as "the world's first USB-C iPhone" and a "true piece of collection for any Apple fanboy out there."
Bids are being accepted until November 11, with estimated delivery by late December. Pillonel said anyone who bids on the iPhone X agrees that they will not restore, update, or erase the device, will not open the device, and will not use it as their daily device. He also cautions that the modded iPhone X is "just a prototype."
The winning bidder will receive the iPhone X with 64GB of storage in its box, without any accessories included. Pillonel is also offering a 30-minute phone call with the winning bidder should they have any questions about the device.
While many have called on Apple to add a USB-C port to the iPhone, the device continues to use Apple's proprietary Lightning connector. Apple has adopted USB-C for some iPad models over the years, including the new iPad mini released in September.
(Thanks, Martin Nobel!)
Article Link: iPhone X Modded With USB-C Port Listed on eBay With Bids Topping $85,000
Insane amount!! On the other hand, iPhone X could be sold at high amounts in auction in the future considering it is Apple's first ever "all screen" iPhone with FaceID
While Apple makes some money from the MFI program, that's unlikely the reason they've kept it. When they moved from 30-pin to Lightning, many people yelled "cash grab! ah, now I gotta buy new cables!", and the iPhone is their high-volume product, so I think they're more hesitant about switching ports up. Also, USB-C was kind of a mess for a long time, and in some ways it still is. Granted, it's way better than it was a few years back, but all the various flavors and speeds of USB-C is a potential quagmire to deal with. That said, I still wish they would have gone USB-C back with the iPhone X.I think they did that because they know iPhone is a very popular product and the lightning cable is making Apple the real money. So, why eliminate that?
He did what Apple doesn't want to do. There's a difference.He did what Apple can’t do!
...it doesn't know about USB3
I’ve only done it to back up my phone before resetting it. But my phone also can’t shoot ProRes. It’s weird how Apple supports this super high file size video and has crazy fast processors and storage on the phones and laptops, but to transfer it you need to use a technology from 2012.I honestly am never plugged into a computer but for those that are I can see the increased data speeds being necessary.
If he used university resources, they technically get a cut of that $85k.To think that someone in this very forum said it was a waste of university resources ......
You are confusing “can’t” with “won’t”He did what Apple can’t do!
If you push one button and open the link you'll read this, "...So basically you can do whatever you want with it but don't expect anything from me if you break something. It is just a prototype." which is sensible because if you try to update the iOS, there's a fair chance that it gets bricked and he isn't liable.wait, so if you get the device, you’re not allowed to open it, you’re not allowed to use it, and you get a 30 minute Q&A for a device you’re not allowed to open or use?
Wow, sounds like an absolute bargain.
maybe I’ll sell my MacBook Air on eBay, claim it’s the first Apple device with an M2, but the catch is that you can’t open it, you can’t use it, and you get 30 minutes to ask about it.
extremely ridiculous.