Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone X Models With Qualcomm Modem Still Have Faster LTE Speeds Than Those With Intel Modems
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
While I agree with you, this is the important part of the article. However, if you get the Qualcomm version, you're held back since it's disabling some of functionality of what the Qualcomm Snapdragon X16 offers. Had it not been disabled, would the differences be much more apparent? That's ridiculous that Apple disabled the full functionality of the modem. In my opinion, by Apple using intel it's resulting in an inferior product overall which affects all users. I hate Qualcomm and prefer Intel as a company, but I can say the difference of having the X16 modem in my Pixel 2, I am getting signal in places that I didn't get before.
You can also purchase the Sprint model in the Apple Store for full price and pop any SIM in it and it will be unlocked. Must be purchased from Apple for this to work.
I'm rocking the T-mobile $30 a month plan on my "Sprint" A1865 iPhone X
LOL. It’s like pointing at the sun at saying it’s dark.
The data clearly shows there’s a significant difference at the spectrum when the signal is weak with 1-2 bars. Under those circumstances, the difference is up to 50%.
Has this option always been there? If not, then this is the SIM free version, available now. Seems like you don't need a Verizon account. Can anyone confirm?
American consumers are less sensitive to cellular performance. Intel chips are cheaper.
In China for example, all iPhone X are Qualcomm. No model lottery because the users are more sensitive to performance. You also see Samsung and Huawei phones in Asia tend to have more RAM than U.S. models.
Intel chips are more expensive? I thought the opposite?
With CDMA/Qualcomm licensing and all
I remember those benchmark results showing how the "Intel" outperformed the Qualcomm, which did not match up with my testing. Looks like they were wrong and must have been paid by Intel or something. This is why I did my own tests shortly after the phone was released. Would have been nice to see this article posted early on so I wouldn't have to go through the hassle testing on my own.
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...mm-iphone-x-benchmarks-for-gsm-users.2084875/
I am glad those who stumbled across my post benefited from my testing however.
"Cellular Insights said the difference is most noticeable in very weak signal conditions, in which the iPhone X with a Qualcomm modem experienced 67 percent faster LTE download speeds on average compared to the Intel model."
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...mm-iphone-x-benchmarks-for-gsm-users.2084875/
I am glad those who stumbled across my post benefited from my testing however.
"Cellular Insights said the difference is most noticeable in very weak signal conditions, in which the iPhone X with a Qualcomm modem experienced 67 percent faster LTE download speeds on average compared to the Intel model."
The article states that 4x4 MIMO is disabled and hints that maybe they disabled other stuff as well but used 4x4 MIMO as the specific example. According to Qualcomm here's what 4x4 MIMO does:
"4x4 MIMO improves operator spectrum efficiency and boosts the data rate for Gigabit LTE devices. Whereas carrier aggregation widens the network highway, 4x4 MIMO adds up to two more layers of data lanes on top of the existing ones to carry more data on the same amount of spectrum."
https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2017/09/07/pumping-network-speed-and-capacity-gigabit-lte
i often notice that my iPhone remains on Edge even if LTE is already available. I need to put it into airplane mode and back out for it to finally sign into LTE. super annoying
It is not the Sim Free version. Option has been there for awhile. It is Verizon model. Apples Sim Free is not on website yet. I think they are still same iPhones.
They added that option shortly before Black Friday, I assume so people can buy them as gifts. It's the same as the sim free will be. I bought a Verizon model to use on T-mobile with in store pickup. Unfortunately the OLED was a mess and I have since returned it and now aren't sure what I want to do.
so slow speeds in areas of weak reception is not a real world situation?
I'm reading these comments and there's lots of good advice on how to get which modem and all, but the other comments about the screens makes me think...
Who the hell would pay $1000+ to participate in a "screen lottery"?
Is this Apple's version of the famous email that you've won the Irish Lottery?
Who the hell would pay $1000+ to participate in a "screen lottery"?
Is this Apple's version of the famous email that you've won the Irish Lottery?
I'm reading these comments and there's lots of good advice on how to get which modem and all, but the other comments about the screens makes me think...
Who the hell would pay $1000+ to participate in a "screen lottery"?
Is this Apple's version of the famous email that you've won the Irish Lottery?
Lots of people !
It’s always a lottery
What shaft do you think you got? I'm getting over 380Mbps with the slow 1901 modem. Is that the shaft?
This. I actually know a cellular radio engineer at Apple. I asked him about these guys way back when they first posted their article comparing the iPhone 7 with Qualcomm
and Intel modems.
In typical Apple fashion he wouldn't tell me anything about what goes on inside Apple (though I always ask him to see if he drops any clues). He did say one thing that stuck out, though. How does an unknown blogger get ahold of half a million dollars in cellular test equipment?
I can't say "always," but it has been there for a month or so at least. That's how I bought my phone (I'm VZW, but wanted to set it up myself later).
JPack is thinking the same as you, that Intel chips are cheaper.
Qualcomm charges the same royalty rate no matter what protocols are used (which is a bone of contention right now), and it's priced by factory phone price, not by the chip.
So a phone maker is free to buy cheaper chips if they want. It doesn't change the phone royalty much unless the chip is multiple tens of dollars cheaper and really lowers the factory phone price.
Last edited:
I don't know anything about that (although I wouldn't be surprised). But everyone should take into consideration that these are LAB tests. Real world results are always different.
Further, I highly doubt the differences between Intel and Qualcomm are so great as to be noticeable in the real world. That wouldn't be like Apple at all.
The report described how the test was done. Any company can confirm by doing the same test.