Well, before Apple makes iPhone X Plus they have to do something about the knotch. I have the iPhone X but I hate the knotch. Please get rid of it. It is an eyesore.
the fact that APPLE made all PLUS owners downsize really sucked! so i'm hoping this is really happening next Sept. when new iPhones are released. X now is great but the Plus size will be magnificent!
Will Apple call the the second gen iphone X the iphone Xs? And since this new 6.4" iphone X plus will be a first gen, it won't be an "s" model. Then there is this suppossed new 6.1" LCD bezel-less iphone. Will that replace the iphone 8? If so will they call it the iphone 8s plus? And if so, will there be a smaller bezel-less LCD regular iphone 8s? And if it isn't going to replace the iphone 8, then what will they call it? And will Apple then release an iphone 8s plus & iphone 8s WITH bezels??! This could get really confusing! Lol
Iphone Xs
Iphone Xs Plus
6.1" bezel-less LCD iphone
Iphone 8s plus (with or without bezels?)
Iphone 8s (with or without bezels?)
Man that mock-up is SWEET! I mean, how did he increase it like that!?!?!
Seriously shouldn't the notch be the same size as the X even if the screen was bigger? Does a bigger phone need a bigger flood projector? Are they putting a DSLR in the notch?
I expect it will shrink a bit each year in width and height over the next three or four years.Yes Sir, that's my baby..... perhaps the notch might shrink a tiny bit to satisfy the haters?
doubtful, however the optical illusion of perception might make it "look" like it is smaller.Yes Sir, that's my baby..... perhaps the notch might shrink a tiny bit to satisfy the haters?
That's what she said!I expect it will shrink a bit each year in width and height over the next three or four years.
It certainly won’t get larger, as depicted in that mock-up.
They will walk away when it suits them. They invested in LG and eventually will probably bring most or all iPhone parts in house.
LCD isn't necessarily inferior in many ways...
Apple's OLED from Samsung is even better than Samsung's OLED from Samsung.
It is taller, but it’s also narrower. The Plus models actually have more screen area than the X.Lol, the X has a larger display than the plus, but to each their own I guess.
No, Apple engineered a better display and Samsung manufactured it. The green sub-pixels are a different shape, they are more square. The display has a higher fill factor than the displays Samsung uses for their own phones.<snip>
Samsung has made 95+% of all OLED mobile display for almost a full decade now. Apple's is no different, but with different calibration and brightness. There is really nothing to bring "in house" unless you are speculating that Apple is going into material or processing/manufacturing engineering.
I find the form factor of the X too small for me. When I got the Plus, I got it because of the form of the phone, not the actual screen size.
No, Apple engineered a better display and Samsung manufactured it. The green sub-pixels are a different shape, they are more square. The display has a higher fill factor than the displays Samsung uses for their own phones.
Notch isn’t going anywhereWell, before Apple makes iPhone X Plus they have to do something about the knotch. I have the iPhone X but I hate the knotch. Please get rid of it. It is an eyesore.
I disagree with both your statements.Those ideas were the result of some misreading of what DisplayMate actually said.
Samsung had already used that green shape.
As for the fill factor, DisplayMate was comparing Samsung's Diamond SubPixel arrangement to other OLEDs without it.
Same ratio as every single other bezeless display. It’s 18:9 not 21:9. Egged then a 18:9:8 thouhhWhen watching a 16:9 format video in non-crop mode (The mode where you can see the entire movie as the makers intended) the X's size is similar to the iPhone 7 (not even 7 Plus). A phone with an Aspect Ratio of 21:9 is going to put black bars on the left and right side of the display in Landscape mode. Until all movie makers begin producing movies in that format. And that is not so likely given the fact that 99% of all tvs are 16:9.
The iPhone X screen aspect ratio is great in portrait mode when reading text on a webpage. For anything else this exotic aspect ratio is a pain in the butt
IPhone 11 X replacementWill Apple call the the second gen iphone X the iphone Xs? And since this new 6.4" iphone X plus will be a first gen, it won't be an "s" model. Then there is this suppossed new 6.1" LCD bezel-less iphone. Will that replace the iphone 8? If so will they call it the iphone 8s plus? And if so, will there be a smaller bezel-less LCD regular iphone 8s? And if it isn't going to replace the iphone 8, then what will they call it? And will Apple then release an iphone 8s plus & iphone 8s WITH bezels??! This could get really confusing! Lol
Iphone Xs
Iphone Xs Plus
6.1" bezel-less LCD iphone
Iphone 8s plus (with or without bezels?)
Iphone 8s (with or without bezels?)
It is 16:9 below the notch. Every bezeless display is using the same aspect ratioI really like my iPhone X, but, I just have no idea why Apple had to follow Samsung and adopt the new aspect ratio of 19.5:9 instead of the regular 16:9 this makes for a way too long phone, no need of that in my opinion, if any thing, just make it a bit longer to include the notch, but overall keep it 16:9 beneath the notch.
Same ratio as every single other bezeless display. It’s 18:9 not 21:9. Egged then a 18:9:8 thouhh
[doublepost=1513847707][/doublepost]
IPhone 11 X replacement
iPhone 11 Plus
iPhone 9 6.1 LCD
iPhone 8+
iPhone SE2
[doublepost=1513847981][/doublepost]
It is 16:9 below the notch. Every bezeless display is using the same aspect ratio
They don't have to put an home button on the top, so a bezel high like the notch could be ok and on the top they could put the sensor without extending the display.
I'd prefer Apple swapping their Apple Logo with a Finger Print scanner...
Currently the logo is useless but replacing it with a fingerprint scanner would be perfect for the index finger.
Even better than current home button..
When you hold the iPhone 8 or 8 Plus in your hand the index finger more or less naturally overlays the Apple Logo.
You're right. Most folks use a cover which would void the idea entirely.If you remember some rumours back in spring were talking about TouchID on the back of the phone. Even some pictures seemed to prove such a thing, with a circle on the back.
I love touchID, but I like it on the front. I always use a cover so I'd need one with an hole on the back and you're right when you say your finger goes on that spot when you hold the phone, but I don't think Apple will change his mind and go back to TouchID.
They just told us FaceID is better and more secure, so I guess all future iPhones will feature FaceID and a design similar to iPhone X. I'm not a fan of the notch, but I don't find it so annoying, so I'm ready for the jump.
Some Android phones have a finger print scanner on the back, and I know some people that are happy about that, so it isn't a bad solution. I guess Apple thought about that at the early development stage of X, but once they knew they could use face detection they went for that, and I don't think they're going back
The diagonal of the rumored X Plus is 6.5. So that implies an aspect ratio the same as the current X (19.5:1).I own an 8+ and I'd be interested in a X+, although the X itself is tempting. Something in the middle would be awesome, basically current plus screen size without bezel. I prefer my 8+ aspect ratio, better for landscape mode and for viewing content in general, so either a slightly wider X or a Plus with less bezels would be the perfect phone.
They don't have to put an home button on the top, so a bezel high like the notch could be ok and on the top they could put the sensor without extending the display.
1) Samsung certainly didn’t use that green shape on the S8 or Note8 displays, and I haven’t seen any evidence of anyone other than Apple using it. Maybe you have though.
2) DisplayMate said: “This Diamond Sub-Pixel layout is used on many OLED displays. On the iPhone X the resulting Sub-Pixel fill factor is much higher than other OLEDs”
The comparison is clearly between the Diamond Sub-Pixel used on many OLEDs (including Samsung obviously) and iPhone X. Not Diamond Sub-Pixel layout vs other layouts, like Pentile. So I think you misread what DisplayMate said.
View attachment 743029
Also, apparently taking photos at that resolution often rounds off the ends of sharp corners.
No. The sentence is: "On the iPhone X the resulting Sub-Pixel fill factor is much higher than other OLEDs”. They're not talking about other Diamond SubPixel layouts. If you search out their other Samsung Diamond display reviews, they say the same thing about about subpixel fill factor for those as well. But I can see how some people got confused.
In a much clearer statement, DisplayMate explicity gave Samsung credit for the hardware, and said that the difference was the calibration:
"First we need to congratulate Samsung Display for developing and manufacturing the outstanding OLED display hardware in the iPhone X.
"But what makes the iPhone X the Best Smartphone Display is the impressive Precision Display Calibration that Apple developed that transforms the OLED hardware into a superbly accurate, high performance, and gorgeous display!!"