See how the numbers change from the share doom and gloom from just last time this was reported? Doesn't look so bad now, does it?
One is about the past. The other is about the future.
Doesn’t production on many things usually get cut after the holidays? Also, production for a new model would likely be at its greatest at launch, since that is when demand will be the highest. Now that the “gotta have it” demand is met, production levels fall to meet “end of contract” upgrades
On CNBC this morning Jim Cramer said the sell side analysts are setting Apple up to fail. They’ve already declared Q2 a disaster even though Apple hasn’t provided any guidance.Yet, today, the Wall Street Journal posted another negative article about Apple, claiming that sales of the X were half of projections. The smarmy comments in the forum are even more hilarious than the postings on the MacRumors forum.
one brand but multiple models.impressive diff from year to year, compared to android is multi brand, and iOS is one brand
Must be nice to have $2,000+ to put toward a PHONE.christ the amount of hate you guys have for the X is insane. My wife and I love ours and it runs rings around the galaxy s8+
History has proven this assumption to be primarily true. Apple's advertising targets that coveted 18-34 yr old demographic. Outside of pharmaceuticals and insurance, you're really not in a valued demographic.The company assumes a 30-year devotee will continue to buy without advertising beyond product announcements and reviews. No more straight-jacket bland IBM guy and cute MAC guy.
Keep reading. So has grammar.Apple's new iPhone X climbed best-selling charts in Europe, Japan, Australia, the United States, and China
reading comprehension has really gone downhill lately.
The article didn't come to that conclusion. You did.OK, did I miss something? The article shows charts of "OS" sales. Not individual device Sales. So, tell me know, they know it's the iPhone X and not the iPhone 8/8+ or iPhone 7/7+ sales. Or, is it a combination of all of them? Yesterday, there was all kinds of press about Apple cutting production of the X by 50% because of less than expected sales of the device. So, tell me, now did this article come to the conclusion it was the X that was responsible for the OS sales alone?
Really, because the TITLE SAYS it ALLThe article didn't come to that conclusion. You did.Nothing in the article implies what you think it does.
christ the amount of hate you guys have for the X is insane. My wife and I love ours and it runs rings around the galaxy s8+
On CNBC this morning Jim Cramer said the sell side analysts are setting Apple up to fail. They’ve already declared Q2 a disaster even though Apple hasn’t provided any guidance.
Please allow me a little bit of snark: A title is not an article.Really, because the TITLE SAYS it ALL
iPhone X Was One of the Top Three Best-Selling Smartphones in December 2017 Across Five Markets
Yet, today, the Wall Street Journal posted another negative article about Apple, claiming that sales of the X were half of projections. The smarmy comments in the forum are even more hilarious than the postings on the MacRumors forum.
christ the amount of hate you guys have for the X is insane. My wife and I love ours and it runs rings around the galaxy s8+
Please allow me a little bit of snark: A title is not an article.
That title doesn't imply what you seem to think it does. To be fair, the article does run two parallel subjects simultaneously. It could be easy to confuse the two. One subject is the X being Top 3 in Sales. The other subject is OS market share. At no point in the article do they imply the entire market share consists of iPhone X. That title doesn't imply it either.
Without numbers and context, the iPhone 8 could have been the best seller and the iPhone 7 could have been the 2nd best seller.
<...>. No more straight-jacket bland IBM guy and cute MAC guy.
See how the numbers change from the share doom and gloom from just last time this was reported? Doesn't look so bad now, does it?