Gimme.

Yeah, the 6s was spec'd at 500 cd/m2.My bad. I wasn't aware they were all specked at 625. I guess I was comparing screen brightness to the 6s, which was the last legacy style iPhone I had before the X.
I hope so. I also live in a back-asswards state, so it may be 2 years lol! Then again AZ is one of the first states piloting electronic vehicle titles and mobile driver licenses. Also that useless ePaper license plate thing. We were also the first state to legalize cell phone insurance cards. So who knows? Hope the transit agency can catch up soon lol.Well, good news, iOS 12 supports NFC access for third parties, so it's only a matter of time: https://www.techradar.com/news/apples-iphone-xs-has-a-game-changing-nfc-feature-even-when-turned-off
THIS.Every review of the XS/Max cameras: "Incredible!" and "Best ever!" and "ZOMG"...
Every review of the same camera in the XR: "...is a very good one" and "...still produces some lovely photos" and "surprisingly handy"...
Perception begets reality. Everybody is gaga over the XS/Max, so naturally the cameras are astounding. Everybody's expectations are tempered for the XR, so naturally the same wide-angle lens is now "just good enough."
Frankly, I've tried 3D Touch on my iPhone X and it's not as useful as I thought. Most iPhone users won't miss it on the iPhone XR.
That $749 iPhone XR will be able to fetch at least $300 after 2 years if you sell it privately, I'd say thats a good investment when you look at total cost of ownership of a smart computer in your pocket.Still laughing at the pricing - $749 for the basic version of an "entry level" phone? Talk about about taking the piss!
But lots of people will buy it . . .
And they run Android, who cares?Uh, virtually every low-mid range Android phone comes with a 1080p screen.
I think the XR is a great product. But honestly the reviews may be too glowing in this respect - the XR would be an awesome phone if the reviewers would willingly use it personally over the XS. I don't get the sense a lot of them would.
The Xr has an A12, same camera as the XS, an all new form factor, 6.1 inch screen, and cutting edge facial recognition.Uh, no - that is now 2 years old. The new entry-level phone is the Xr, and at $749 the pricing is ludicrous. To say nothing of it being a downgrade in several respects from the 6S through the 8.
Love the design... no thanks on that screen though.
It is still likely correct to say most users will not miss 3D Touch because in my experience most users do not use it.I don't believe that to be true. Some users may not miss 3D Touch if they never truly understood how to use it in the first place or never knew it existed. But for those who actually know how to utilize 3D Touch, I believe that they would miss it on the XR. It really depends how familiarized the user is with 3D Touch, but I find it be a really useful tool once you actually know how to utilize it.
Some reviewers claimed the same thing about 6 and 6 Plus but to me the difference is pretty obvious in some scenarios.Did you not read the part where reviewers claim that you can't really even tell the difference unless you're looking at the XR side by side with the XS? I think the screen thing is blown way out of proportion.
It is still likely correct to say most users will not miss 3D Touch.
Some users may not miss 3D Touch.
I personally consider 3D Touch a negative. I gave it 3 months but could never learn to like it.
I'm glad to see 3D Touch gone. I hope they remove it completely in 2019 from all the new models.
As I mentioned before, it's very unlikely Apple will release a SE2. However, 326 ppi 5.2" LCD XR-lite would have the same screen real estate as the 5.5" XS, but in roughly the same footprint as the 4.7" 8.
No, you said "some". I said "most".I already acknowledged this point:
I consider it a negative because it causes fragmentation of the iOS user interface, yet is a feature that most people do not use, and a feature most developers shun.That’s fine that you don’t like it, but you can’t classify it as a ‘negative’ simply because it’s not something you prefer yourself. It is a useful tool for those who actually know to utilize it, The flipside is that for those who actually do utilize 3D Touch, know exactly what I’m referring to, in the sense that it is a shortcut tool to navigate through the iPhone quicker and it’s more convenient in that sense with Peek/Pop. Regardless, you can’t be dismissive of something just because _you_ don’t support 3D Touch, we have to look at the whole spectrum.
Ah I see. My hypothetical 5.2" 326 ppi LCD-endowed "XE" is a prediction based directly on the math. IMO, that's the only real option that would make sense mathematically that Apple would introduce in a year or two, to replace the SE.Agreed.
When I say 'SE/SE2' it's very much with quotation marks around it, as the SE was obviously a one off.
Whatever Apple will call it is anyone's guess, given their slightly crazy naming schemas!
iPhone XE?
Who knows...
"a computer you can put in your pocket"Yup, I don't see the big phone fad letting down anytime soon. I love the size of my SE but bought the Xr.
What's cooler than to have a computer you can put in your pocket. The phone has become secondary.
I know! I use 3D touch often for sure. Sad to see it go.
The Xr has an A12, same camera as the XS, an all new form factor, 6.1 inch screen, and cutting edge facial recognition.
To say it’s a downgrade from the 6S is comical. The only “downgrade” is the ppi from the plus models, which will be imperceptible and the new LCD will have better contrast, brightness, color reproduction, dynamic range, etc.
It will be interesting to see if 3D Touch finally makes its way onto the new iPads this month.That’s fine that you don’t like it, but you can’t classify it as a ‘negative’ simply because it’s not something you prefer yourself. It is a useful tool for those who actually know to utilize it, The flipside is that for those who actually do utilize 3D Touch, know exactly what I’m referring to, in the sense that it is a shortcut tool to navigate through the iPhone quicker and it’s more convenient in that sense with Peek/Pop. Regardless, you can’t be dismissive of something just because _you_ don’t support 3D Touch, we have to look at the whole spectrum.
. I said "most".
I consider it a negative because it causes fragmentation of the iOS user interface, yet is a feature that most people do not use, and a feature most developers shun.
It's also a negative in that it adds cost..
Except there are a few problems with that reasoning:At the same time, it's hard to say the average person should spend 899 on this phone when they can have much better at 250 more.
Plus it seems this LCD screen is lesser quality than older iphones: That’s not to say it matches the quality of previous iPhone LCDs. The iPhone XR LCD definitely shifts a little pink and drops brightness quickly when you look at it off-axis, which often leads to a bit of a shimmery effect when you move the phone around. I noticed that shimmer right away, but I had to point it out to other people for them to see it. (It’s one of those things you might not notice at first, but you can’t un-see it.) Apple told me the XR display should match previous iPhone LCDs in terms of performance, but side by side with an iPhone 8 Plus, the off-axis shifts are definitely more pronounced. You will also definitely notice the huge bezel around the entire display, which flows into the notch.
I'm not the only person that believes most people do not use 3D Touch. It's a common refrain amongst tech writers.Right, but you can’t support a quantitive number for ‘most’. Its a subjective hypothetical. You have no idea who utilizes 3D Touch and the demographic. I could make the counter argument the majority I know around me do use 3D Touch.
Most? You seem interject more of your own stance on opinion versus something that you don’t actually have any factual information on. It’s already been acknowledged that 3D Touch may not be used by everyone, but to dismiss it all together just because you think it’s not used ‘from your experience’ around you is not an appropriate response, its anecdotal.
Is it possible it could be eliminated, maybe. But the fact that Apple retained for the XS speaks volumes as well. The only reason it was not included with XR because of cost relations, if Apple would have eliminated 3D Touch for the XS, then I would agree with you, in which fact it seems that it’s contradictory that Apple _is_ still Including it.
Except that wireless charging is a popular feature. 3D Touch is not.Could I make the counter argument consider that wireless charging is a ‘negative’ that adds to the cost as well, but its something I don’t use? In your theory, So I should probably dismiss the fact that wireless charging is not used by everyone, therefore Apple should eliminate it. That’s basically your theory on a subjective stance, just used in a different context as an example.
Every review of the XS/Max cameras: "Incredible!" and "Best ever!" and "ZOMG"...
Every review of the same camera in the XR: "...is a very good one" and "...still produces some lovely photos" and "surprisingly handy"...
Perception begets reality. Everybody is gaga over the XS/Max, so naturally the cameras are astounding. Everybody's expectations are tempered for the XR, so naturally the same wide-angle lens is now "just good enough."
What about call quality?
Fully agreed here - and this has been my take away since the September event.
If you need to step up one option on storage (ie 64GB isn’t enough), the jump creates an additional $100 in difference between the XR and XS/Max. I had mentioned this in other threads but where I am in Canada it results in a $700 difference from the XR to XS Max ($1241 vs $1952).
I’m honestly quite surprised that there’s a $50 option to jump to 128GB. Wish they had that with the XS as well. Going to the already crazy expensive XS and needing to spend another $150 for a storage jump just hurts. Not to mention AppleCare+ if you’re worried about the potential of needing to pay for a replacement phone if you crack the rear glass.
Haha, yeah my 3 year old iPhone 6s with it's almost 2 year old battery (replaced by Apple) still gets me through a full day no problem, but I'm not glued to my screen all bloody day so...
I think it has a lot to do with how much power is being used to maintain the cell or wifi connection. At least I hope so because I also would never use up a modern iPhone's battery in one day. But plenty of folks report doing just that.
Also social media apps which are constantly trying to extract some data from the phone are a drain. I suspect installing Facebook and using Chrome without an ad blocker as browser of choice would be a battery hit.