It's always the same talking points.
FaceID is faster (assuming you're already looking at the phone and don't include swiping)
FaceID is more secure (literally no one ever has had a problem because fingerprint sensors are slightly too insecure but FaceID would have just been secure enough)
iPhone has smaller bezels (assuming you compare to the largest bezel on the competitor and don't count Apple's digital chin)
iOS has better RAM management (because it doesn't support multitasking so only has to manage a single app at a time)
iOS users won't want to change (even though 95% of the apps they use are identical on Android)
I would challenge the whole concept that FaceID is more secure. To the point that FaceID is one of the least secure methods of locking a device if you are with the device.
If I as a criminal or a police/government agency has you and your phone with me.
If it has a fingerprint lock, then I'd need to physically try and force you to get one of your 10 fingers onto the pad.
If it has a password lock then I need to threaten you or read your mind to access the code.
If it has Face ID all I need to do it get you to roughly look at the phone for a second and I have access.
Whilst Apple may say it's more secure in one way, it's the very least secure in all other ways.
As a human, if I hold something up, you will turn and see what I'm holding, and the second you do that, your phone I'm holding is unlocked.
That's VERY insecure in a real world scenario.
Hell, I could even put the phone into someone else, with a small hole where the faceID sensor/s are and ask you to look at something at you'd not even realise it was your phone.
Sure, if your phone is found, then it's secure, but if you are with your phone, its the least secure.